The concept of justice is not only understood as a concept aimed at humans as the subject, but also the environment as a unified system, which ultimately justice is also for humans and the environment itself, both for present and future generations. The principles that develop in relation to environmental protection and management, are formed from global awareness which then become principles that must be adopted in the legal systems of countries that recognize the importance of environmental protection and preservation. The Supreme Court is fully aware of its role in protecting and preserving the environment. Through its regulations and decisions, the Supreme Court seeks to form a unified view of green justice and 'green judges'.
The purpose of this study is to find out about the setting of the authority of the Indonesian National Army (TNI) overcoming the armed separatist movement, armed insurgency, and acts of terrorism in Law NRI Number. This research is normative legal research using the statutory approach, historical approach, comparative approach, philosophical approach. The analysis technique is done by qualitative juridical analysis. The results showed that the legis ratio of regulating the authority of the Indonesian National Army in overcoming armed separatist movements, armed insurgency, and acts of terrorism in RI law number 34 of 2004 concerning the Indonesian National Army was departed from the desire to abandon the dual function model of ABRI, namely as a security and security forces and as a social-political force. As a social and political force, ABRI at that time had a role as a stabilizer, a dynamist, as a pioneer, and as an implementer of Pancasila democracy. With the enactment of RI law number 34 of 2004 concerning the Indonesian National Army, changing the Indonesian National Army as a means of defense of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia, which is tasked with implementing a state defense policy to uphold national sovereignty, maintain territorial integrity, and protect national security, carry out military operations for war and military operations other than war, and actively participate in the task of maintaining regional and international peace
The execution of the Administrative Court decision is regulated in Article 116 of Law Number 51Year 2009. Ratio legis of Article 116 of Law Number 51 Year 2009 are (1) respect for Administrative Court decisions by requiring government officials to execute and be subjected coercive measures if they do not carry out their obligations, and (2) involving the President and the representative institutions tomake the Administrative Court decisions effective. However, the ratio legis is not reflected in the formulation of norms, so that resulting an incomplete execution regulation. It has implications that Administrative Court decisions is not executed by government officials.
The existence of Administrative Court is very closely related to the rule of law. Administrative justice has a role to uphold the principle of legal protection for the people through repressive supervision of government actions. For this reason, the main authority of the Administrative Court is to hear, examine and decide government disputes. This authority has increased since the enactment of No.30 of 2014 namely authorized to adjudicate whether or not there is an element of abuse of authority, requests for positive fictitious decisions/actions, and lawsuits against unlawful acts by the government.
The purpose of this study is to find out about the setting of the authority of the Indonesian National Army (TNI) overcoming the armed separatist movement, armed insurgency, and acts of terrorism in Law NRI Number. This research is normative legal research using the statutory approach, historical approach, comparative approach, philosophical approach. The analysis technique is done by qualitative juridical analysis. The results showed that the legis ratio of regulating the authority of the Indonesian National Army in overcoming armed separatist movements, armed insurgency, and acts of terrorism in RI law number 34 of 2004 concerning the Indonesian National Army was departed from the desire to abandon the dual function model of ABRI, namely as a security and security forces and as a social-political force. As a social and political force, ABRI at that time had a role as a stabilizer, a dynamist, as a pioneer, and as an implementer of Pancasila democracy. With the enactment of RI law number 34 of 2004 concerning the Indonesian National Army, changing the Indonesian National Army as a means of defense of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia, which is tasked with implementing a state defense policy to uphold national sovereignty, maintain territorial integrity, and protect national security, carry out military operations for war and military operations other than war, and actively participate in the task of maintaining regional and international peace
Advocate is a free and independent profession. According to the Constitutional Court Decision number 112/PUU–XII/2014 & 36/PUU–XIII/2015. It is interesting that the decision has decided the issue of oath in Article 4 Paragraph (1) Advocate Law, but affects Article 28 Paragraph (1) concerning Advocates Organization. This research is a normative research that uses conceptual approach and legislative approach, which hopefully can dig up and find out the position of Advo- cates Organizations after the Constitutional Court Decision number 112/PUU–XII/2014 & 36/PUU– XIII/2015. It is known from the research that the Constitutional Court is unauthorized to decide which organization is legitimate, although Advocates Organization can also be named as state institution.
The type of research used in this research is normative legal research. Considering the RASA as the prevention and prosecution of criminal acts of corruption, collusion and nepotism, where this task is entrusted to the Corruption Eradication Commission, it encourages the Government and the House of Representatives to give authority to the CEC as an institution that imposes sanctions on state administrators in relation to non-compliance with the obligation to report RASA in the amendments to the Law. Law No. 28/1999 concerning the Implementation of a Clean and Corruption-Free State, Collusion and Nepotism or the Law on the Corruption Eradication Commission, which so far have been sanctioned for non-compliance with the obligation to report RASA to the respective agencies where the State Administrator is located. In this regard, the author proposes that the CEC be given the authority to impose sanctions on Providers who do not comply with reporting RASA and also those who are dishonest in reporting RASA, so that the meaning of the RASA function is not only preventive in nature but also action is realized as well as for State Organizers not to play games in carrying out their obligations to report RASA.
Forest and land fires often occur in Indonesia. The effects of fires are far-reaching and have significant impacts on the environment, economy, heritage and social structure of rural areas, as well as nearby cities and neighboring countries. Often the community is the victim of forest and land fires. The community expects benefits in the implementation of law enforcement. However, based on the ideals and objectives of the law, there is not a single legal umbrella or legislation that accommodates the interests of victims of forest and land fires. The purpose of this study is to find out how the government's authority in providing protection to the rights of people who are victims of forest and land fires. This research is normative legal research with a statutory approach, a comparative approach and a historical approach. The legal materials used are primary, secondary, and tertiary with the technique of analyzing legal materials using Systematic, Grammatical, Extensive and Historical interpretation methods. The results of the study indicate that the government's authority in providing protection for the rights of the victims of forest and land fires is to provide preventive legal protection in the form of laws and regulations made based on the authority of the government as a legislator.
Forest and land fires often occur in Indonesia. The effects of fires are far-reaching and have significant impacts on the environment, economy, heritage and social structure of rural areas, as well as nearby cities and neighboring countries. Often the community is the victim of forest and land fires. The community expects benefits in the implementation of law enforcement. However, based on the ideals and objectives of the law, there is not a single legal umbrella or legislation that accommodates the interests of victims of forest and land fires. The purpose of this study is to find out how the government's authority in providing protection to the rights of people who are victims of forest and land fires. This research is normative legal research with a statutory approach, a comparative approach and a historical approach. The legal materials used are primary, secondary, and tertiary with the technique of analyzing legal materials using Systematic, Grammatical, Extensive and Historical interpretation methods. The results of the study indicate that the government's authority in providing protection for the rights of the victims of forest and land fires is to provide preventive legal protection in the form of laws and regulations made based on the authority of the government as a legislator.
The type of research used in this research is normative legal research. Considering the RASA as the prevention and prosecution of criminal acts of corruption, collusion and nepotism, where this task is entrusted to the Corruption Eradication Commission, it encourages the Government and the House of Representatives to give authority to the CEC as an institution that imposes sanctions on state administrators in relation to non-compliance with the obligation to report RASA in the amendments to the Law. Law No. 28/1999 concerning the Implementation of a Clean and Corruption-Free State, Collusion and Nepotism or the Law on the Corruption Eradication Commission, which so far have been sanctioned for non-compliance with the obligation to report RASA to the respective agencies where the State Administrator is located. In this regard, the author proposes that the CEC be given the authority to impose sanctions on Providers who do not comply with reporting RASA and also those who are dishonest in reporting RASA, so that the meaning of the RASA function is not only preventive in nature but also action is realized as well as for State Organizers not to play games in carrying out their obligations to report RASA.
The presence of Law No. 18 of 2013 concerning Prevention and Eradication of Forest Destruction, intends to provide comprehensive protection of the importance of the existence of forests. On the other hand, this P3H Law also resulted in overlapping authorities investigating criminal acts on forest destruction. The authority to investigate criminal acts of forest destruction is carried out by three institutions namely police investigators, civil servant investigators, and investigators for the Prevention and eradication of forest destruction.
This research aims to analyze and to describe the relation between the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia (CC) with the People Representatives' Council and the President of the Republic of Indonesia as legislators by looking on implementation of CC's decision through the legislation in the period 2004-2015. Using doctrinal research, it can be seen how the constitutional mandate in the CC's decision are implemented by the legislator through the legislation. The results are: (a) legal opinions of the CC's decision have a binding power; (b) a constitutional mandate in the legal opinion is intended as guidance for the legislators regarding what the 1945 Constitution requires; (c) directives to the legislator in the legal opinions should be implemented because it is the implementation of the principle of checks and balances according to the 1945 Constitution, (d) implementation of the CC's decisions through legislation does not have standard mechanism and does not become the priority of legislation, and (e) relation between the CC with the legislators can not be categorized in black and white in cooperative or confrontative, but shows ups and downs between cooperative and confrontative relations. Cooperative relations are realized when the constitutional mandate is formulated strongly so it is implemented by the legislator as the formula. Relationships tend to be cooperative in the implementation of the constitutional mandate of the decision, but not a priority of legislation. Meanwhile, the confrontative relations is seen from the constitutional mandate of the CC decisions which are not implemented.
Lamongan is the epicenter of aphtae epizootica disease. Symptoms of the disease appeared from the newly purchased cattle in Balungpanggang District, Gresik Regency. Symptoms that appear hypersalivation, decreased appetite, panting, slightly feverish body temperature. This review was conducted by collecting primary data through field observations and supported by references from the Google Scholar database with the keywords foot and mouth diseases, aphtae epizootica and infectious diseases. The pattern of distribution is mainly cattle traffic, weak biosecurity in cattle pens and livestock transportation means for sending cattle from or to the animal market. Based on a descriptive analysis of the results of surveillance, investigation and sample testing indicating an outbreak of an infectious disease suspected to be FMD in Lamongan Regency according to the definition of an outbreak according to Law No. 18 of 2009 concerning Livestock and Animal Health and Government Regulation No. 47 of 2014 concerning Disease Control and Prevention. Animal. The direct impact in the form of economic losses due to illness and death if the outbreak is not controlled is estimated to be quite significant.
One of the Land Asset Management facets in Indonesia has been so far the possession of the land as an asset for local government. The regulation allows local government to organize local land assets to support land use planning in various patterns. While at the same time, Indonesia has a rigorous rule on land use planning with Euclidean Zoning System called RTRW Plan, which lasts for 20 years. Land use patterns could not be ruled by projecting a specific order, ideology, technical stances, etc. This article would like to contextualize a dynamic in which city leader infrastructure strategic planning was being technically anticipated by filtering out the feasibility of local land asset which meet the minimum requirement of the RTRW as the principal reference for spatial land use planning. This article does not necessarily address its aim at problematizing RTRW; rather, in the first place, it discusses the vigorous of the local government technical department to bridge a so-called City Leader strategic planning with the current systems of the RTRW. Here, the article would argue that a tiny time frame of the City Leader's order leaves a narrow space for technical staff to map out a holistic technical plan. Instead, opting for a specific local land asset appeared to be the instant solution to such a plan. Furthermore, the second concern of this article specified its attention on providing the technical means so that the choice of the predetermined location was constructively and objectively justified beforehand. A specific case study of Pekalongan Regency, Central Java Indonesia, allowed delving into the empirical case. The city leader was at the last year of his terms, and it was claimed, the choice to develop hospital infrastructure was part of a political maneuver. A qualitative approach in the form of in-depth interviews and compilation of secondary documents was employed. The city technical managers needed to operate rational technocratic mechanisms to the politico-technique juxtaposition to justify the planning problem's technical rationality and the other side to provide a technical solution, pointing out land assets under the framework of the RTRW. Thus, the arguments developed in this work contested the land choice technical assessments were not necessarily neutral rather a supporting element to adjust the overwhelming leader's strategic choice fully. Further discussion materials are proposed. In this case, the political strategy created a circumstance of instantaneity and a limited time frame that could lead to the enthusiasm of strategic thinking under the realm of the urban planning system. ; One of the Land Asset Management facets in Indonesia has been so far the possession of the land as an asset for local government. The regulation allows local government to organize local land assets to support land use planning in various patterns. While at the same time, Indonesia has a rigorous rule on land use planning with Euclidean Zoning System called RTRW Plan, which lasts for 20 years. Land use patterns could not be ruled by projecting a specific order, ideology, technical stances, etc. This article would like to contextualize a dynamic in which city leader infrastructure strategic planning was being technically anticipated by filtering out the feasibility of local land asset which meet the minimum requirement of the RTRW as the principal reference for spatial land use planning. This article does not necessarily address its aim at problematizing RTRW; rather, in the first place, it discusses the vigorous of the local government technical department to bridge a so-called City Leader strategic planning with the current systems of the RTRW. Here, the article would argue that a tiny time frame of the City Leader's order leaves a narrow space for technical staff to map out a holistic technical plan. Instead, opting for a specific local land asset appeared to be the instant solution to such a plan. Furthermore, the second concern of this article specified its attention on providing the technical means so that the choice of the predetermined location was constructively and objectively justified beforehand. A specific case study of Pekalongan Regency, Central Java Indonesia, allowed delving into the empirical case. The city leader was at the last year of his terms, and it was claimed, the choice to develop hospital infrastructure was part of a political maneuver. A qualitative approach in the form of in-depth interviews and compilation of secondary documents was employed. The city technical managers needed to operate rational technocratic mechanisms to the politico-technique juxtaposition to justify the planning problem's technical rationality and the other side to provide a technical solution, pointing out land assets under the framework of the RTRW. Thus, the arguments developed in this work contested the land choice technical assessments were not necessarily neutral rather a supporting element to adjust the overwhelming leader's strategic choice fully. Further discussion materials are proposed. In this case, the political strategy created a circumstance of instantaneity and a limited time frame that could lead to the enthusiasm of strategic thinking under the realm of the urban planning system.
