Racism and responsibility – The critical limits of deepfake methodology in security studies: A reply to Howell and Richter-Montpetit
In: Security dialogue, Band 51, Heft 4, S. 386-394
ISSN: 1460-3640
63 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Security dialogue, Band 51, Heft 4, S. 386-394
ISSN: 1460-3640
In: Chinese political science review, Band 2, Heft 4, S. 445-451
ISSN: 2365-4252
In: Review of international studies: RIS, Band 35, Heft 2, S. 253-276
ISSN: 1469-9044
AbstractThe Copenhagen school's theory of securitisation has mainly focused on the middle level of world politics in which collective political units, often but not always states, construct relationships of amity or enmity with each other. Its argument has been that this middle level would be the most active both because of the facility with which collective political units can construct each other as threats, and the difficulty of finding audiences for the kinds of securitisations and referent objects that are available at the individual and system levels. This article focuses on the gap between the middle and system levels, and asks whether there is not more of substance there than the existing Copenhagen school analyses suggests. It revisits the under-discussed concept of security constellations in Copenhagen school theory, and adds to it the idea of macrosecuritisations as ways of getting an analytical grip on what happens above the middle level. It then suggests how applying these concepts adds not just a missing sense of scale, but also a useful insight into underlying political logics, to how one understands the patterns of securitisation historical, and contemporary.
In: Review of international studies: RIS, Band 35, Heft 2, S. 253-276
ISSN: 0260-2105
In: Review of International Studies, Band 23, Heft 2, S. 241-250
In: Worlding Beyond the West
A host of voices has risen to challenge Western core dominance of the field of International Relations (IR), and yet, intellectual production about world politics continues to be highly skewed. This book is the second volume in a trilogy of titles that tries to put the "international" back into IR by showing how knowledge is actually produced around the world. The book examines how concepts that are central to the analysis of international relations are conceived in diverse parts of the world, both within the disciplinary boundaries of IR and beyond them. Adopting a thematic structur
In: Worlding beyond the West
It has become widely accepted that the discipline of International Relations (IR) is ironically not international at all. IR scholars are part of a global discipline with a single, shared object of study - the world, and yet theorizing gravitates around a number of concepts that have been conceived solely in the United States. The purpose of this book is to re-balance this western bias by examining the ways in which IR has evolved and is practiced around the world. The fifteen case studies offer fresh insights into the political and socioeconomic environments that characterize diverse geocultural sites and the ways in which these traits inform and condition scholarly activity in International Relations. By bringing together scholars living and working across the globe Tickner and Wæver provide the most comprehensive analysis of IR ever published. It is essential reading for anyone who is concerned about the history, development and future of international relations.
In: Worlding beyond the West
In: The new international relations
The state of the art of international relations theory, with analysis of the work of twelve key contemporary thinkers; John Vincent, Kenneth Waltz, Robert O. Keohane, Robert Gilpin, Bertrand Badie, John Ruggie, Hayward Alker, Nicholas G. Onuf, Alexander W
In: Security dialogue, Band 44, Heft 5-6, S. 485-506
ISSN: 1460-3640
Although securitization theory has been applied worldwide, it has been accused of having only limited appositeness to the non-Western world. When the Centre for Advanced Security Theory began a collaboration with the Danish–Egyptian Dialogue Institute and the Al-Ahram Centre for Political and Strategic Studies in Cairo in 2010, securitization theory was challenged on two levels: both through its employment to analyse and act politically in a Middle Eastern context, and through the attempt to do so during and after the Arab Spring, when the entire Egyptian security sector was being re-evaluated. These unique circumstances prompted reflections on the use of non-traditional and traditional security concepts, on how the Egyptian revolution could be understood through securitization theory, and on what the experiences of this project might mean for further theory development. This article discusses these points in the light of the Danish delegation's experiences.
In: Relaciones internacionales: revista académica cuatrimestral de publicación electrónica, Heft 22, S. 167-209
ISSN: 1699-3950
En este resumen presentamos el capítulo introductorio de International Relations Scholarship Around the World, publicado por Routledge en 2009. Los editores y también autores de esta introducción, Ole Wæver y Arlene B. Tickner, argumentan sobre la necesidad dentro de la teoría de Relaciones Internacionales de mirar más allá de los límites geográficos, espaciales y temporales actuales. Al plantear un debate en relación a los fundamentos epistémicos de la disciplina y en relación al cientifismo de los datos recolectados, Wæver y Tickner ponen en cuestión la supuesta globalidad de una disciplina que es más a menudo basada en la influencia que la identidad local proyecta en otras culturas y en otras situaciones políticas. Los autores buscan incorporar la teoría producida desde espacios alternativos muy importantes, aunque aún poco representados. Este libro no es solo acerca de otros espacios geográficos o trabajos no tradicionales desde el terreno, sino también de valiosas metodologías y prácticas diseñadas desde otras áreas actualmente no entedidas como Relaciones Internacionales (RRII). En este capítulo se crítica cómo el conocimiento es producido, cómo la academia y la investigación son financiadas, cómo dicha financiación influye en el contenido de la investigación y cómo esto prejuicia a los investigadores. Wæver y Tickner enfatizan los aportes de este libro para académicos e investigadores sobre el terreno en cuanto a los enfoques teóricos y los datos producidos por los estudios de caso. Por último, los autores nos invitan a considerar las RRII no solo desde la experiencia concreta sino también como una compilación de teorías inter-relacionadas que nos ayudan a comprender las realidades más allá de los espacios tradicionales.
This abstract describes the introductory chapter of International Relations Scholarship Around the World, published by Routledge in 2009.The editors and authors of this introduction, Ole Wæver and Arlene B. Tickner, argue the necessity within International Relations theory to look beyond current geographical, spatial and temporal borders. Posing a debate regarding the discipline's epistemic foundation and scientific data from mainstream sources, Wæver and Tickner contest the supposed globality of a discipline that is more often biased by local identity projected on other cultures and political issues. Wæver and Tickner seek to incorporate theory produced from important, yet unrepresented alternative sources. International Relations Scholarship Around the World is not only about other geographical spaces and non-traditional works from the field, but also valuable methodology and practices drawn from other fields currently not incorporated in International Relations. This introduction critiques how knowledge is produced, how academia and research is funded, how funding influences research content, and the effect of researcher bias. Wæver and Tickner call for International Relations Scholarship Around the World to advise scholars and researchers, emphasizing theoretical approaches, case study data, for international and local practitioners. Wæver and Tickner ask that we consider IR not just as a concrete experience, but also as a compilation of interrelated theories for understanding realities outside traditional spaces. ; En este resumen presentamos el capítulo introductorio de International Relations Scholarship Around the World, publicado por Routledge en 2009. Los editores y también autores de esta introducción, Ole Wæver y Arlene B. Tickner, argumentan sobre la necesidad dentro de la teoría de Relaciones Internacionales de mirar más allá de los límites geográficos, espaciales y temporales actuales. Al plantear un debate en relación a los fundamentos epistémicos de la disciplina y en relación al cientifismo de los datos recolectados, Wæver y Tickner ponen en cuestión la supuesta globalidad de una disciplina que es más a menudo basada en la influencia que la identidad local proyecta en otras culturas y en otras situaciones políticas. Los autores buscan incorporar la teoría producida desde espacios alternativos muy importantes, aunque aún poco representados. Este libro no es solo acerca de otros espacios geográficos o trabajos no tradicionales desde el terreno, sino también de valiosas metodologías y prácticas diseñadas desde otras áreas actualmente no entedidas como Relaciones Internacionales (RRII). En este capítulo se crítica cómo el conocimiento es producido, cómo la academia y la investigación son financiadas, cómo dicha financiación influye en el contenido de la investigación y cómo esto prejuicia a los investigadores. Wæver y Tickner enfatizan los aportes de este libro para académicos e investigadores sobre el terreno en cuanto a los enfoques teóricos y los datos producidos por los estudios de caso. Por último, los autores nos invitan a considerar las RRII no solo desde la experiencia concreta sino también como una compilación de teorías inter-relacionadas que nos ayudan a comprender las realidades más allá de los espacios tradicionales.
BASE
In: Religion in International Relations, S. 147-180
In: Cooperation and conflict: journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, Band 36, Heft 4, S. 430-442
ISSN: 1460-3691
In: Millennium: journal of international studies, Band 29, Heft 3, S. 705-739
ISSN: 1477-9021