Article(electronic)#31July 1994
Correspondence
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 88, Issue 3, p. 513-513
ISSN: 2161-7953
Search results
Filter
Format
Type
Language
More Languages
Time Range
45675 results
Sort by:
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Article(electronic)#32January 1994
Correspondence
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 88, Issue 1, p. 88-88
ISSN: 2161-7953
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Article(electronic)#33October 1992
Correspondence
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 86, Issue 4, p. 787-791
ISSN: 2161-7953
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Article(electronic)#34July 1992
Correspondence
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 86, Issue 3, p. 542-546
ISSN: 2161-7953
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Article(electronic)#35October 1989
Correspondence
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 83, Issue 4, p. 901-904
ISSN: 2161-7953
Considerable ink has been spilt on the subject of 28 U.S.C. §1350, the Alien Tort Statute. My limited purposes here are to address Anne-Marie Burley's appealing analysis of the statute presented in the last issue of the Journal and to draw attention to significant legislation that casts additional light on the framing of the statute. My comments relate to Oliver Ellsworth, the drafter of section 1350 and the most influential senator in the First Congress, which enacted the Alien Tort Statute.
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Article(electronic)#36July 1986
Correspondence
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 80, Issue 3, p. 600-601
ISSN: 2161-7953
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Article(electronic)#37July 1984
Correspondence
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 78, Issue 3, p. 653-653
ISSN: 2161-7953
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Article(electronic)#38April 1983
Correspondence
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 77, Issue 2, p. 404-407
ISSN: 2161-7953
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Article(electronic)#39January 1983
Correspondence
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 77, Issue 1, p. 134-134
ISSN: 2161-7953
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Article(electronic)#40April 1981
Correspondence
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 75, Issue 2, p. 362-362
ISSN: 2161-7953
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Article(electronic)#41January 1981
Correspondence
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 75, Issue 1, p. 141-141
ISSN: 2161-7953
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Article(electronic)#42October 1978
Correspondence
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 72, Issue 4, p. 878-878
ISSN: 2161-7953
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Article(electronic)#43October 1976
Correspondence
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 70, Issue 4, p. 816-816
ISSN: 2161-7953
The first sentence of Professor Murase's article "The Most-Favored-Nation Treatment in Japan's Treaty Practice During the Period 1854-1905" which appeared in the April issue of the Journal is incorrect. He asserts that "[i]t can be said today that a unilateral most-favored-nation (MFN) clause is only of historical significance." However, even today, Japan lives under the threat of a unilateral unconditional most-favored-nation clause.
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Article(electronic)#44April 1976
Correspondence
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 70, Issue 2, p. 338-339
ISSN: 2161-7953
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Article(electronic)#45January 1976
Correspondence
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 70, Issue 1, p. 111-112
ISSN: 2161-7953
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print