Suchergebnisse

บทคัดย่อเนื่องจากปัจจุบันมีการละเมิดข้อมูลส่วนบุคคลที่ก่อให้เกิดความเสียหายต่อเจ้าของข้อมูลส่วนบุคคล โดยเฉพาะการจัดเก็บข้อมูลชีวมาตร ซึ่งมีผลมาจากความก้าวหน้าทางเทคโนโลยีที่เก็บรวบรวมใช้ หรือเปิดเผยข้อมูลส่วนบุคคล การเข้าถึงข้อมูลส่วนบุคคลทำได้โดยง่าย สะดวก และรวดเร็ว อันมีผลกระทบต่อความมั่นคง และเศรษฐกิจโดยรวม ประเทศไทยจึงได้มีการประกาศใช้พระราชบัญญัติคุ้มครองข้อมูลส่วนบุคคล พ.ศ. 2560 ขึ้น เพื่อกำหนดหลักเกณฑ์ กลไก หรือมาตรการกำกับดูแลเกี่ยวกับการให้ความคุ้มครองข้อมูลส่วนบุคคลอย่างไรก็ตาม กฎหมายฉบับนี้ยังมีประเด็นที่น่าศึกษาวิเคราะห์เพิ่มเติมในเรื่องของการเก็บรวม รวมใช้ ประมวลผล และการส่งหรือโอนข้อมูลไปยังต่างประเทศ โดยได้ศึกษาเปรียบเทียบจากกฎหมายคุ้มครองส่วนบุคคลของต่างประเทศ ได้แก่ สหภาพยุโรป ประเทศสหรัฐอเมริกา ประเทศแคนาดา และประเทศสหพันธรัฐเยอรมัน เพื่อนำมาปรับปรุง แก้ไข หรือเพิ่มเติมบทบัญญัติกฎหมายของประเทศไทยอันเป็นประโยชน์ด้านการคุ้มครองข้อมูลส่วนบุคคลได้อย่างมีประสิทธิภาพมากยิ่งขึ้น AbstractNowadays, the violation of personal information causes damage to the information owners, especially the biometric data, because the advance technologymade the acquire access and disclose of personal data easily. Due to mentional problem may affect Thailand's national security and economy; therefore, the Government promulgated the Personal Data Protection Act 2017 to specify criteria, mechanisms, or regulatory measures regarding the protection of personal data. However, this Act still has some issues that should study further regarding the collection, usage, processing transmission, and or transferring of information to other countries. This study employed a comparative study of personal data protection laws of foreign countries such as the European Union, the United States of America, Canada, and Germany should in order to improve or amend the Thai law to become more efficient in the protection of personal data.

Abstract
Despite the increased attention that was given to data protection laws in national jurisdictions – especially after the adoption of the General Data Protection Regulation by the European Union – international law still does not offer a higher standard of protection to the personal data of civilians in times of armed conflict, where the deletion or manipulation of personal data of the civilian population can have significant harmful effects. This article explains that at the time of the adoption of the relevant international treaties and the development of customary international law, international humanitarian law (IHL) did not protect personal data stored electronically, and even though commentators in contemporary times tend to accept the object status of electronic data, State practice still remains inconclusive, largely excluding computerized personal data from the protective regime of IHL. The article argues further that a stricter protection of personal data regulation could potentially lead to harmful effects for protected persons, such as civilians, therefore it is undesirable. The protective nature of IHL must prevail over the data protection interests.

The arrangement of personal data protection in national law is stipulated explicitly in the regulation of the Minister of the Ministry of communication and Informasi No. 20 of 2016 on the protection of personal data. In Indonesia, there are no rules that accommodate the protection of personal data on financial technology. That can be hazardous when the economic response of technology is not limited to its use. The case of personal data is not contained in the case of a Such hazard that may arise. The case from the theft of personal data, damage to the system that may allow the occurrence of data breaches, misuse of personal data that has been the business ruled itself, or other parties who may access personal consumer data (such as government). The need to set this up is important because private data is a person's privacy right. Still, it can fundamentally be economically valuable for a third party who is about to take advantage of it.

The porpose of this study is to solve public doubts about the security of personal data in the PeduliLindungi application. This study uses a normative research method that is oriented to the rule of law and a case approach. The law in Indonesia has not regulated the violation of personal data leakage, so there are no strict sanctions against the perpetrators who leak personal data. Because there is no legal certainty in the protection of personal data, there are many crimes and result in the misuse of personal data. Currently the guarantee of personal data protection is only based on the ITE Law but there are no criminal provisions against perpetrators of spreading personal data. Because there is a legal vacuum, a draft law on the protection of personal data has been made, rules that can protect citizens' personal data have been made, but these regulations have not been ratified. The government should provide provisions so that legal certainty is achieved. In this era of technological development 4.0, the government is required to be firm in establishing regulations related to cyber crime. Another way is to add the KTP function to replace the PeduliLindungi application to track the spread of the Corona virus because the KTP has guaranteed the security of one's personal data.

ABSTRACTA key challenge in information privacy research is how to value personal data with privacy consideration. In this study, we propose an experimental auction approach for valuing personal data. We use the generalized second‐price auction to assess the monetary values of individuals' identity, demographic, and private information. We find that individuals' economic valuation of personal data is consistent with their actual self‐disclosure behaviors. The economic valuation approach also produces results that are consistent with some well‐accepted observations about consumer demographics and privacy. On the other hand, individuals' stated privacy preferences and attitudes are not consistent with their economic valuation. The findings of this study suggest that the proposed approach can be an effective mechanism for measuring personal data privacy. This study also provides important insights into valuing personal information for practical uses with several implications to policy decision makers, corporate executives and managers, data analysts, as well as decision science researchers.

Background Government and private responses to the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in the generation and dissemination of personal data not previously available in the public sphere. Focus of the Article This "Notes from the Field" paper reflects on the implications of this surge of new data for the study and practice of social marketing. The paper examines how this phenomenon impacts on the following aspects of social marketing: (1) Setting of explicit social goals; (2) citizen orientation and focus; (3) value proposition delivery via the social marketing intervention mix; (4) theory-, insight-, data-, and evidence-informed audience segmentation; (5) competition/barrier and asset analysis; and (6) critical thinking, reflexivity, and being ethical. Research Question How are the government and private responses to the pandemic shaping the generation and use of personal data, and what are the implications of this eruption of data for the social marketing scholarly community? Approach The paper highlights how the pandemic resulted in significant changes in behavior of government and citizens alike, and how these changes, in turn, spurred the generation and dissemination of new personal data. Subsequently, we draw on the Core Social Marketing Concepts framework to explore how the aforementioned data explosion impacts on the six dimensions of this central framework. Importance to the Social Marketing Field The COVID-19 pandemic is more than a temporary public health event. Therefore, it is important to consider the lasting consequences that may stem from the pandemic-induced personal data explosion, for both consumers and social marketing scholars and practitioners. Methods This paper comments on a topical matter, and discusses its implications for the social marketing community. Results We find that the data explosion creates conflicting social marketing goals, and that inequalities in access to digital technology are increasingly impacting what voices are heard, and which concerns are prioritized. Moreover, new innovations may be enabled or needed, leading to the improvement of firms' ability to create value for individual citizens; the creation of new datasets—particularly among demographics that previously had a limited digital footprint—enhances the ability to segment markets and target social marketing activities. Furthermore, the pandemic-induced data explosion may lead to the identification of additional barriers to positive social behaviors that have emerged, diminished, or even disappeared during the pandemic; but researchers need to critically examine the consequences of the government and private behaviors at the macro, meso, and micro levels. Recommendations for Research or Practice We propose a research agenda for the social marketing community, consisting of 21 research questions. Limitations Our analysis focuses on the behavior of government and citizens in North America and Western Europe.

The recording, aggregation, and exchange of personal data is necessary to the development of socially-relevant machine learning applications. However, anecdotal and survey evidence show that ordinary people feel discontent and even anger regarding data collection practices that are currently typical and legal. This suggests that personal data markets in their current form do not adhere to the norms applied by ordinary people. The present study experimentally probes whether market transactions in a typical online scenario are accepted when evaluated by lay people. The results show that a high percentage of study participants refused to participate in a data pricing exercise, even in a commercial context where market rules would typically be expected to apply. For those participants who did price the data, the median price was an order of magnitude higher than the market price. These results call into question the notice and consent market paradigm that is used by technology firms and government regulators when evaluating data flows. The results also point to a conceptual mismatch between cultural and legal expectations regarding the use of personal data.

Since the establishment of IoT (Internet of Things), a variety of end devices become interconnected with one another, and thus, new types of security challenges appeared which have to be taken care of. Personal data, at the moment, have a higher risk of being hacked by various types of cyberattacks, as a result of the abundance of connectivity in the cloud realm. To face this type of challenges, the European Union decided to implement in 2018 the GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) that implies that personal data of any kind can be shared with a third party only with their accord and can be, as well, deleted by them, whenever they desire. Henceforth, this paper introduces the PARFAIT project that will take into account this regulation and will integrate a platform with the purpose of protecting the personal data in IoT based applications, especially for smart home, smart office and smart hotel use cases.

This deliverable confirms that a data protection policy for the project will be kept on file. An evaluation of the ethics risks related to the data processing activities of the project is also presented, including an opinion if data protection impact assessment should be conducted under art.35 General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679. Detailed information on the informed consent procedures in regard to data processing will be kept on file. ; This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 824711.