Suchergebnisse

Considers whether the traditional rights accorded tangible property apply also to intellectual property, asserting that philosophical, legal, economic, & political bases for protecting these kinds of property differ significantly enough that equating the two forms of property is problematic. References. Adapted from the source document.

Property exists in the following forms: - private property - property of individual civil law entities (individual, legal entity). - public property - property of the people of Ukraine presented as an independent form due to the specific legal regime of its use. Specific legal regime of public property: - Property state (is the impersonal property of citizens of Ukraine (subsoil); - Procedure for acquiring property rights (permitting and competitive); - Settlement entity having a dual (private and public) legal nature (state of Ukraine, local government). Types of property - private property Individual is the ownership of property to an individual or entity. One entity is the plurality or singularity of objects. Joint is the ownership of property jointly to several individuals or entities. Plural entities are the plurality or singularity of objects. Such item belongs simultaneously to individuals or entities entitling them to jointly exercise the powers of the property owner. It is not the thing itself that is divided between the co-owners, but the ownership over it.

Long before the onset of the now-emblematic quarrel between England and Greece over the Parthenon marbles, nations and tribes have squabbled over the extraterritorial transfer of objects of purported cultural significance. Over the past few decades, however, there has been a dramatic increase in the number of cultural property repatriation claims, mostly targeting U.S. collections. The value of cultural artifacts is generated largely by the intellectual expression they manifest. Digital technologies make increasingly possible the creation of reproductions of even three-dimensional artifacts, which are indistinguishable from the originals. This development challenges our attributing value to the "aura" of the original renderings of tangible cultural artifacts. Stripped of their auras, the worth of these objects devolves to the sum of the value of the physical materials deployed in their creation, and that ascribed to the perceptible intellectual expression they contain. If we were to perceive cultural artifacts fundamentally as works of information rather than of tangible property, the location of the original instantiations of them would be of little significance. Three-dimensional technologies might soon permit source nations to retain the essential intellectual value of cultural artifacts found within their borders, while simultaneously capitalizing upon sales of the originals to collectors who will pay for their "aura."

Discusses the attractions of property to institutional investors.
Describes the evolution of future markets from forward contracts in
commodity markets and financial and stock market index futures to the
current UK proposal for property index futures. Concludes that property
professionals should make every effort to understand and develop the
proposed market in a way which will benefit property investors most
effectively.