China's Future Economic Regionalization
In: Journal of contemporary China, Band 10, Heft 29, S. 587-611
ISSN: 1469-9400
3385 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of contemporary China, Band 10, Heft 29, S. 587-611
ISSN: 1469-9400
In: Democratic Consolidation in Eastern Europe Volume 2: International and Transnational Factors, S. 58-75
In: Latin American perspectives: a journal on capitalism and socialism, Band 14, Heft 2, S. 237
ISSN: 0094-582X
In: Research policy 34.2005,8
In: Special issue
In: Latin American perspectives, Band 14, Heft 2, S. 237-254
ISSN: 1552-678X
In: Marine corps gazette: the Marine Corps Association newsletter, Band 89, Heft 10, S. 53-57
ISSN: 0025-3170
In: Latin American perspectives: a journal on capitalism and socialism, Band 14, Heft 2, S. 237-254
ISSN: 0094-582X
Analyse der 1982 in Nikaragua eingeleiteten Versuche, den öffentlichen Sektor zu dezentralisieren, die Effizienz des Staatsapparates zu verbessern und die Institutionen auf lokaler Ebene politisch und administrativ zu stärken. Im Vergleich mit anderen lateinamerikanischen Ländern hat das nikaraguanische Regionalisierungsprogramm gute Fortschritte gemacht
World Affairs Online
In: Migration, Regionalization, Citizenship, S. 1-12
In: Current history: a journal of contemporary world affairs, Band 111, Heft 745, S. 175-180
ISSN: 0011-3530
In: Civitas: revista de ciências sociais, Band 18, Heft 2, S. 221
ISSN: 1984-7289
Mundialização, regionalização e fronteiras---
In: Anuario de espacios urbanos, historia, cultura y diseño: aEU, Heft 7, S. 255-268
ISSN: 2448-8828
In: CRC biogeography series
Cover ; Half Title; Title Page; Copyright Page; Dedication; Table of Contents; List of Figures ; Preface ; Author ; Chapter 1: Theoretical Background ; EVOLUTIONARY BIOGEOGRAPHY ; STEPS OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOGEOGRAPHY ; Biogeographic Regionalization ; Nomenclatural Conventions ; Format Used in the Book ; Chapter 2: Historical Background ; Biogeographic placement of the Neotropical region ; Early regionalization of the Neotropical region ; Modern Biogeographic Regionalization ; Biogeographic Regionalization in the Twenty-First Century ; Chapter 3: The Neotropical Region ; NEOTROPICAL REGION.
The paper critically evaluates current regionalization and institutional framework for managing regional development policy in Serbia in the context of joining the European Union. Firstly, the current regionalization in Serbia is presented based on the standards of statistical nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics (NUTS) and EUROSTAT methodology. Ten the institutional mechanism for guiding EU cohesion policy in the current budgetary period (2014-2020) is analyzed, as well as the availability and the purpose of EU funds for mitigation of regional disparities in the Member States. The paper points out that from the standpoint of the development needs of the NUTS 2 level in Serbia it might be better to define larger areas for the territorial units NUTS 3 level (administrative districts) instead of the current solutions (counties). The arguments that there is currently no adequate attention of the creators of economic and overall policy regarding the problems of regional development in Serbia are summed up. For more successful integration into the EU, Serbia has to conduct priority activities related to the establishment of an efficient institutional framework composed of various policy instruments, which should provide stability and continuity in regional development. However, a number of current issues are still opened (respect for the territorial aspect in setting development goals, the regional typology according to development criteria, interregional and intraregional relations, overcoming the problem of regional disparities in development). In this sense, the marginalization of these areas in public policy in Serbia is certainly not conducive to significant use of EU funds. In this context, in the coming period in Serbia it is necessary to implement the following processes: (a) completion of a comprehensive and coherent institutional framework for the management of regional policy, (b) the establishment of mechanisms for e?ective management of regional policy, especially to stimulate faster development of areas with specific development problems (c) the efficient use of EU funds and (d) the gradual functional and fiscal decentralization, in order to strengthen the capacity of local government to carry out activities aimed at local economic development. This is especially important if one takes into account the fact that all our regions belong to the first group of EU regions (less developed), because they are below the 75% of development compared to the EU average (the most developed region in Serbia – Belgrade region – has reached development level of about 60% of the EU average). Since 2012 Serbia has not had any strategic document in the Feld of regional development. This indicates that new strategic directions of development in terms of regional dimensions and in the context of the current economic and social developments are not defined. In this context, it is indicative that even in Eurostat Regional Yearbook, which records statistics for the European regions, Serbian regions are not even recognized, because EU funds have not reached agreement on statistical regions with Serbia. Bearing all this in mind, it can be concluded that Serbia is late with preparations in the field of regional policy and coordination of structural instruments. The concluding section contains the recommendations for the regional policy in Serbia in the future (the improvement of inter-municipal cooperation, the implementation of an integrated endogenous approach to development, improvement of regional statistics, better coordination of the work of the national line ministries, strengthening the capacity of local governments, etc.). ; ??????? ???? ?? ???????? ??????????? ???????? ??????????????? ? ???????????????? ?????? ?? ?????? ???????? ??????????? ??????? ? ?????? ? ????????? ???????????? ????????? ?????. ?????? ?? ???????????? ???????? ??????????????? ? ?????? ????? ??????????? ??????????? ???????????? ?????????????? ???????? ?? ?????????? (????) ? ?? ???????????? ????????-?. ????? ?? ????????? ??????????????? ????????? ?? ?? ?????? ????????? ???????? ? ??????? ????????? ??????? (2014-2020), ??? ? ????????????? ? ?????? ????????? ?? ?? ??????? ?? ??????? ?????????? ??????????? ???????????? ? ??????? ?????????. ? ???? ?? ?????? ?? ?? ?? ?????????? ????????? ??????? ??????? ???? 2 ????? ? ?????? ????? ???? ???? ?? ?? ?? ????????????? ???????? ???? 3 ????? ???????? ???? ???????? (??????????????? ???????) ?????? ????????? ?????? (??????/???????). ?????? ?? ? ????????? ?? ? ?????? ???????? ?? ??????? ???????????? ????? ???????? ????????? ? ????????? ???????? ?? ?????? ???????? ??????????? ??????? ?????. ????????? ????????? ?? ??????? ???????? ????? ?????? ???????????? ?? ????????? ?? ???????? ??????????????? ?????, ??? ? ???????????? ??????????????? ?????????? ?? ????????? ????????? ??????????. ? ??? ??????, ??????????????? ??? ??????? ? ?????? ?????????? ? ?????? ??????? ?? ????????? ??????????? ????????? ????????? ?? ?? ???????. ? ????????? ???? ???? ?? ???? ????????? ?? ?????? ?????????? ???????? ? ?????? ? ???????? ???????.
BASE
In: Journal of Hydrology
The flow duration curve is regionalized by using morphoclimatic characteristics of the drainage basin. The monthly flow duration characteristics at eleven major flow measuring sites across the western and northwestern regions of Greece were first parameterized. Using multiple regression techniques, the geographic variation of each parameter of the best fitted flow duration model is explained in terms of the mean annual areal precipitation, the drainage area, the hypsometric fall and the length of the main river course from the divide of the basin to the site of interest. The regionalized regression equations are successfully used to synthesize flow duration curves at other locations within the hydrologically homogeneous regions of western and northwestern Greece. The method is useful in obtaining estimates of water availability for hydropower at ungaged sites (especially for small hydropower plants, for run-of-river plants), or for other water resources development (water supply, water quality projects), within the regions studied, where the main governmental interest for water resources development is focused. © 1985.
BASE
In: Regional development dialogue: RDD ; an international journal focusing on Third World development problems, Band 33, Heft 1, S. 45-60
ISSN: 0250-6505