Financial Market Implications of India's Pension Reform
In: IMF Working Papers, S. 1-21
470909 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: IMF Working Papers, S. 1-21
SSRN
In: Journal of peace research, Band 39, Heft 1, S. 131
ISSN: 0022-3433
In: American political science review, Band 96, Heft 4, S. 864-865
ISSN: 0003-0554
In: IMF Working Papers, S. 1-33
SSRN
In: Survival: global politics and strategy, Band 43, Heft 3, S. 193-194
ISSN: 0039-6338
In: Perspectives on political science, Band 30, Heft 4, S. 242
ISSN: 1045-7097
Will EMU accelerate or retard structural reform in labour and product markets? The theoretical literature is ambiguous. New descriptive evidence provided in this paper suggests that euro-area countries have made relatively good progress in structural reform. However, it is much less clear whether progress can be ascribed to EMU membership. To explore further the influence of monetary regime, the paper undertakes an econometric examination of the likelihood that countries undertake reform in five specific areas of labour and product market policies. Based on pooled cross-country/time series Probit regressions covering 21 countries and the period 1985-2003, it is found that structural reform is strengthened by high unemployment, crisis, healthy public finances, reforms in other policy fields and small country size. Further, countries that pursue fixed exchange-rate regimes or participate in monetary union, and therefore have little or no monetary autonomy, appear to undertake less reform – with the effect possibly being concentrated on large countries.
BASE
In: Comparative economic studies, Band 43, Heft 2, S. 129-134
ISSN: 1478-3320
In: Foreign affairs: an American quarterly review, Band 80, Heft 3, S. 129
ISSN: 2327-7793
It is commonly argued that crises open up a window of opportunity to implement policies that otherwise would not have the necessary political backing. The argument goes that the political cost of deep reforms declines as crises unravel structural problems that need to be urgently rectified and the public is more willing to bear the pains associated with such reforms. This paper casts doubt on this prevalent view by showing that not only the crises-reforms nexus is unfounded in the data, but rather crises are associated with slowing structural reforms depending on the institutional environment. In particular, we look at measures of reforms in international trade, agriculture, network industries, and financial markets. We find that, after a financial crisis, democracies neither open nor close their economy. On the contrary, autocracies reduce reforms in multiple economic sectors, as the fear of regime change lead non-democratic rulers to please vested economic interests.
BASE
In: Journal of post-Keynesian economics, Band 14, Heft 2, S. 169-182
ISSN: 1557-7821
In: Development and change, Band 35, Heft 2, S. 247-274
ISSN: 1467-7660
AbstractFinancial liberalization policies in the 1990s were intended to raise formal sector interest rates, enhance competition and expand access for users. This article investigates patterns of provision and use in a local financial market in Karatina, Kenya, at the end of the 1990s after a period of financial and economic liberalization. It takes a holistic approach, examining both formal and informal financial arrangements and microfinance interventions. This is because the role of the informal financial sector is particularly important for poor people and has received relatively little attention in the discussion of the consequences of reform. The author does this using a 'real' markets approach that sees markets as socially regulated and structured. Significant provision by the mutual sector (formal and informal), and poor lending performance by the banking sector is explained through an examination of the characteristics of the services on offer and their embeddedness in social relations, culture and politics.
It is argued that crises open up a window of opportunity to implement policies that otherwise would not have the necessary political backing. The argument goes that the political cost of deep reforms declines as crises unravel structural problems that need to be urgently rectified and the public is more willing to bear the pains associated with such reforms. This paper casts doubt on this prevalent view by showing that not only the crises-reforms hypothesis is unfounded in the data, but rather crises are associated with slowing structural reforms depending on the institutional environment. In particular, we look at measures of liberalization in international trade, agriculture, network industries, and financial markets. We find that, after a financial crisis, democracies neither open nor close their economy. On the contrary, autocracies reduce liberalizations in multiple economic sectors, as the fear of regime change might lead non- democratic rulers to please vested economic interests.
BASE
In: Comparative European politics, Band 8, Heft 3, S. 327-353
ISSN: 1740-388X
In: Comparative European politics: CEP, Band 8, Heft 3, S. 327-354
ISSN: 1472-4790