Suchergebnisse

The aim of the article is to clarify the essence of the main forms of inter-confessional confrontation in Ukraine among Christian churches and to find ways to counteract them in order to religiously and nationally consolidate Ukrainian society. Conflictogenic factors influencing the interfaith confrontation in modern Ukraine have been identified. There are two main groups of interfaith conflicts, each of which has special forms of interfaith confrontation and different phases of their severity: conflicts between Orthodoxy and other denominations; conflicts in the Orthodox environment.
It is substantiated that with the restoration of the Ukrainian Churches during the rise of Ukrainian independence in the 90s of the twentieth century. interfaith relations have become more acute, which is associated with both the split of Ukrainian Orthodoxy and the actualization of the long-standing conflict between Orthodoxy and the revived Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church. The reasons for the confrontation in the Orthodox environment were conflicts of corporate interests between individual Orthodox church institutions, different views of each of them on the principles of the unification process and a radically opposite understanding of canonicity. The formation of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine, although integrating the interests of the two Orthodox denominations (UOC KP and UAOC), at the same time did not eliminate inter-confessional contradictions with the UOC within the Moscow Patriarchate.
It is concluded that the realities of Ukrainian church life encourage an active search for ways to counteract interfaith confrontation, a key aspect of which should be the establishment of a new format of socio-religious communication in the coordinates "Church-Church", "Church-State", "Church-Society". In a practical sense, effective means of its implementation can be: interfaith dialogue, building the Orthodox Church of Ukraine, countering Russian ideological aggression, strengthening the role of the media in overcoming religious threats.

This article is devoted to important topical issues, dedicated to the institution of public events - the order of organization and conduct of counter-measures. At the moment, the issue of theoretical comprehension of nature and the organizational and legal specifics of counter-measures seems to be whitewashed in the science of state law. Holding a public event on the most resonant issues of the social and political agenda often entails holding an event aimed at expressing disagreement with the positions of the organizers and participants of another public event. These questions form the relevance of the article presented. ; Рассматривается актуальная проблематика, посвященная институту публичных мероприятий - порядку организации и проведения контрмероприятий. В настоящий момент вопрос теоретического осмысления природы и организационно-правовой специфики контрмероприятий представляется пробельным в науке государственного права. Проведение публичного мероприятия по наиболее резонансным вопросам социальной и политической повестки, зачастую влечет за собой проведение мероприятия, направленного на выражение несогласия с позициями организаторов и участников другого публичного мероприятия. Указанные вопросы образуют актуальность представленной статьи.

Für die Entwicklung von Individuen, von sozialen Gruppen und von Gesellschaften werden zwei einander entgegen wirkende und miteinander verbundene Typen sozialer Interaktion als relevant erachtet: (a) Unterstützung und (b) Gegenhandeln und Hemmung von Lernen, Erziehung und Entwicklung. Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden Ursachen für diese Gegenhandlungen ebenso beschrieben wie – für unterschiedliche Bereiche menschlicher Aktivität – Typen ihrer Verbindung mit Hilfe. Negative und positive Effekte von Hilfe und von Gegenhandeln werden analysiert, und es wird ein konzeptuelles System von verschiedenen Zonen der Entwicklung für unterschiedliche soziale Interaktionen im Verlauf des Erziehungsprozesses vorgestellt. Es wird gezeigt, dass komplexe kognitive und emotionale Faktoren, die mit Gegenhandeln verbunden sind, sowohl entwicklungsbehindernd als auch entwicklungsfördernd wirken können.

The effectiveness of the mechanism for ensuring national security is determined primarily by its ability to contribute to the preservation of the unity of nations, the stability of public relations, the protection of national cultural values, the overcoming of political, military, economic, social crises, the creation of prerequisites for stable development, and the ability to effectively counter threats to national security. This brings to life mechanisms for countering threats to national security, including information threats, which at the present stage are characterized by increased danger, because the information confrontation is building up its capabilities as a result of the rapid growth in the volume and importance of information in the modern world.Mechanisms of counteraction to information threats of external sources are a combination of different types of activity of bodies of state and military management, public organizations and political institutions, etc., as well as images of their relationships that allow to operatively influence external threats to information security or manage the risks that they are conditioned, for the purpose of their localization and neutralization.The evaluation of the relevant mechanisms is based on: the state information policy, its impact on security parameters; identification of the degree of risk of deviations of parameters for the stability of the information security system; determining the external circumstances in which the deviations occur: increasing or decreasing risks.Thus, the mechanisms for countering information threats from external sources, primarily based on risk management principles, allow the blocking of destructive elements, properties, processes that destroy the information security and national security system as a whole, and stimulate constructive elements, properties, processes, which contribute to its functioning and development. ; Стаття присвячена дослідженню механізмів протидії інформаційним загрозам зовнішніх джерел у контексті забезпечення національної безпеки України. Встановлено, що механізми боротьби з інформаційними загрозами з боку зовнішніх джерел, в основному засновані на принципах управління ризиками, дозволяють блокувати деструктивні елементи, властивості, процеси, які руйнують інформаційну безпеку та систему національної безпеки у цілому, і стимулюють конструктивні елементи, властивості, процеси, які сприяли її функціонуванню та розвитку.