Zimbabwe and trade liberalization
In: Peace review: peace, security & global change, Volume 3, Issue 4, p. 48-51
ISSN: 1469-9982
7079 results
Sort by:
In: Peace review: peace, security & global change, Volume 3, Issue 4, p. 48-51
ISSN: 1469-9982
In: The Encyclopedia of Public Choice, p. 312-320
In: Research paper 2005,36 : Theory and methods
In: Journal of development economics, Volume 83, Issue 2, p. 549-561
ISSN: 0304-3878
In: Journal of development economics, Volume 83, Issue 2, p. 549-561
ISSN: 0304-3878
World Affairs Online
In: Michael Michaely, TRADE LIBERALIZATION AND TRADE PREFERENCES, Revised Edition, World Scientific, 2009
SSRN
SSRN
In: CEPAL review, Volume 1993, Issue 50, p. 41-62
ISSN: 1684-0348
In: Journal of international economics, Volume 20, Issue 1-2, p. 65-81
ISSN: 0022-1996
In: Controversies in Globalization: Contending Approaches to International Relations, p. 1-39
In: European journal of political economy, Volume 17, Issue 2, p. 209-232
ISSN: 0176-2680
This paper points out that the General Agreement on Tariffs & Trade (GATT)/World Trade Organization (WTO) trade liberalization possesses very special characteristics. I argue that these characteristics are responses to a set of problems inherent to contemporary trade liberalization. This is not a matter of mere historical interest. These problems remain very much with us, & recognition of this fact should influence our approach to future trade negotiations. 30 References. Adapted from the source document.
In: Routledge studies in the modern world economy 43
World Affairs Online
In: The Canadian journal of economics: the journal of the Canadian Economics Association = Revue canadienne d'économique, Volume 37, Issue 2, p. 484-508
ISSN: 1540-5982
Abstract. The GATT Rounds show that trade liberalization is essentially a cooperative non‐stationary dynamic process. Therefore, the impact of Regionalism on trade liberalization possibly changes over time. I adapt the trade liberalization model of Devereux (1997) to examine how this impact varies. Common markets lead to a one‐time shock in immediate tariffs, as well as to a change in their rate of decline. I find that common markets that happen late in the trade liberalization process are more likely to lead to a decline in immediate tariffs. Common markets also increase the rate of decline of tariffs after their formation. JEL Classification: F03, F15
In: Journal of Emerging Markets Economics: Environmental & Social Aspects, Vol. 2, No. 27, March 18, 2011
SSRN