Suchergebnisse

[8], 28 p. ; R.M. = Ralph Maddison, whose name appears on a3r. ; The first leaf is blank. ; Reproductions of the original in the British Library. ; Appears at UMI microfilm "Early English books, 1475-1640" reel 850 and at UMI microfilm "Early English books, 1641-1700" reel 260 (same copy filmed twice).

Intro -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Table of Contents -- PREFACES -- INTRODUCTION -- I. GENERAL PRESENTATION OF THE TRIBUNAL AND ITS OPERATION -- I. ORGANISATION OF THE COURT -- II. JURISDICTION OF THE TRIBUNAL -- 1. Jurisdiction ratione loci -- 2. Jurisdiction ratione temporis -- 3. Jurisdiction ratione materiae: punishable crimes -- 4. ratione personae Jurisdiction: the guilty parties -- III. PROCEDURES -- II. AID, PROTECTION AND FACILITIES AVAILABLE TO VICTIMS AND WITNESSES -- I. FINANCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL ASPECTS OF AID AND PROTECTION -- 1. The need for an adequate budget -- 2. The distribution of aid to victims and witnesses -- II. PROTECTION GIVEN TO VICTIMS AND WITNESSES: INDISPENSABLE BUT STILL INADEQUATE -- 1. Explicit and direct protection: the inadequacies -- 2. Explicit but indirect protection -- 3. The question of protection of victims and witnesses from national jurisdictions -- III. LIGHTENING THE BURDEN OF PROOF: THE EXAMPLE OF SEXUAL ASSAULT -- III. THE CRUX OF THE MATTER: TRYING THE CRIMINALS -- I. TRYING THE CRIMINALS: COOPERATION FROM STATES IS A NECESSITY -- 1. The apportionment of jurisdictions between the Tribunal and the National Jurisdictions -- 2. Cooperation from the states and legal aid -- II. TRYING THE CRIMINALS: THE RESOURCES ALLOCATED -- 1. Remanding the accused to the custody of the court -- 2. Absence of the accused: an obstacle to prosecution and conviction: -- 3. A penal responsibility that would be difficult to dispute -- CONCLUSION -- SUMMARY BIBLIOGRAPHY -- ORGANIZATIONS WHICH TOOK THE INITIATIVE TO PRODUCE THIS BOOK -- APPENDICES -- - Security Council Resolution 808 (22 February, 1993) -- - Security Council Resolution 827 (25 May, 1993) -- - Rules of procedure and evidence of the Hague Tribunal (as amended 6 October 1995) -- NIJHOFF LAW SPECIALS.

Hearings held April 20, 21, 22, and 28, May 3, 11, 12, 13, 25, 26 and 27, 1971. ; Includes bibliographical references. ; Mode of access: Internet.

In section 214 UU number 10 year 2008 about general election legislative member determine chosen candidate stipulating determined by minimum boundary of acquirement voice 30% gratuity of common denominator elector ( BPP), if the threshold is not reached then further selected based on the determination of candidate sequence numbers. Based on the decision of the Court Number 22-24/PUU-VI/2008 article is repealed. With this decision, the role of political parties is reduced to the determination of candidates elected in the general election. Party only the sharing to present its legislative candidate in candidate list, whereas determining chosen or is not chosen by elector.

In this Top Twenty Commentaries section of the Centennial Issues of the journal, Nathaniel Beck & Jonathan N. Katz review their highly cited article What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data(1995). The author's assert that their article contributed to the methodology for analyzing the principal type of data used in the study of quantitative data that is now being used in comparative politics & international relations. The analysis of Time Series Cross Section (TSCS) data as used by Cameron & Hibbs is argued to allow for rigorous analysis of both temporal & spatial dimensions of the data. The importance of these issues to political science research, & the growing interest in finite sample properties of estimators are related to the superior method of least squares combined with correction for standard errors over the use of an asymptotically superior estimator. The initial refusal of the article by the Review, & the current methodological debates are concluded to not increase concern that they author's missed many important issues in their seminal article. References. J. Harwell