Gendered innovations in economics: Marilyn Waring's approach to social science research
In: Women's studies international forum, Band 72, S. 137-143
3193346 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Women's studies international forum, Band 72, S. 137-143
In: History workshop journal: HWJ, Band 51, Heft 1, S. 206-219
ISSN: 1477-4569
In: Canadian public policy: Analyse de politiques, Band 19, Heft 4, S. 379
ISSN: 1911-9917
Cover Page -- Dedication -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Contents -- Notes on Contributors -- Acknowledgements -- Queer Methods and Methodologies: An Introduction -- 1 Queer in the Field: On Emotions, Temporality and Performativity in Ethnography -- 2 Intimacy with Strangers/Intimacy with Self: Queer Experiences of Social Research -- 3 Brown, Queer and Gendered: Queering the Latina/o 'Street-Scapes' in Los Angeles. -- 4 The 'Outness' of Queer: Class and Sexual Intersections -- 5 Queer Methods and Queer Practices: Re-examining the Identities of Older Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual Adults -- 6 Queer(ing) Communication in Research Relationships: A Conversation about Subjectivities, Methodologies and Ethics -- 7 The Trouble with Fieldwork: Queering Methodologies -- 8 Queer Conversations: Old-time Lesbians, Transmen and the Politics of Queer Research -- 9 Femme on Femme: Reflections on Collaborative Methods and Queer Femme-inist Ethnography -- 10 Queer(y)ing the Ethics of Research Methods: Toward a Politics of Intimacy in Researcher/Researched Relations -- 11 Method Matters: Ethnography and Materiality -- 12 Autoethnography is a Queer Method -- 13 Queer Techne: Two Theses on Methodology and Queer Studies -- 14 Queer Quantification or Queer(y)ing Quantification: Creating Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual or Heterosexual Citizens through Governmental Social Research -- Bibliography
World Affairs Online
1. Queer in the field : on emotions, temporality and performativity in ethnography / Alison Rooke -- 2. Intimacy with strangers/intimacy with self : queer experiences of social research / Jamie Heckert -- 3. Brown, queer and gendered : queering the Latina/o 'street-scapes' in Los Angeles / Lorena Munoz -- 4. The 'outness' of queer : class and sexual intersections / Yvette Taylor -- 5. Queer methods and queer practices : re-examining the identities of older lesbian, gay, bisexual adults / Andrew King and Ann Cronin -- 6. Queer(ing) communication in research relationships : a conversation about subjectivities, methodologies and ethics / Andrew Gorman-Murray, Lynda Johnston and Gordon Waitt -- 7. The trouble with fieldwork : queering methodologies / Michael Connors Jackman -- 8. Queer conversations : old-time lesbians, transmen and the politics of queer research / Catherine J. Nash -- 9. Femme on femme : reflections on collaborative methods and queer femme-inist ethnography / Ulrika Dahl -- 10. Queer(y)ing the ethics of research methods : toward a politics of intimacy in researcher/researched relations / Mathias Detamore -- 11. Method matters : ethnography and materiality / Mark Graham -- 12. Autoethnography is a queer method stacey / Holman Jones and Tony E. Adams -- 13. Queer techne : two theses on methodology and queer studies / Tom Boellstorff -- 14. Queer Quantification or queer(y)ing Quantification : creating lesbian, gay, bisexual or heterosexual citizens through governmental social research / Kath Browne.
The A-Z is a collection of entries ranging from qualitative research techniques to statistical testing and the practicalities of using the Internet as a research tool. Alphabetically arranged in accessible, reader-friendly formats, the shortest entries are 800 words long and the longest are 3000. Most entries are approximately 1500 words in length and are supported by suggestions for further reading
In: Du bois review: social science research on race, Band 18, Heft 2, S. 221-250
ISSN: 1742-0598
AbstractSince the 1980s, everyday racism has gained ground within the social sciences. However, the theory of everyday racism has not been properly adopted and, consequently, varies across different research fields. The main goal of this study is to improve the scientific rigor within research on everyday racism in the human and social sciences. Following a review of the ground-breaking work of Philomena Essed, three main components in everyday racism literature are theoretically distilled and conceptualized: (1) repetitiveness and familiarity, (2) racism and (3) the interdependent link between micro-interactions and macro-structures. This is followed by a critical assessment ofwhateveryday racism means andhowit is assessed in research today, by performing a systematic electronic review of qualitative-methods papers. We make three suggestions towards a more complete and sophisticated understanding of everyday racism. Firstly, the concepts of everyday racism and microaggressions need to be disconnected from each other. Secondly, research should focus more on the symbiotic relation between micro-interactions and macro-structures and should also identify relevant situational features at the spatial meso-level. Lastly, it is important to be cautious of the pitfall of cultural determinism that is still a popular perspective in today's field of (everyday) racism.
"In December 2003, the Division of Tuberculosis Elimination (DTBE), National Center for HIV, STD and TB Prevention (NCHSTP), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) convened The Tuberculosis Behavioral and Social Science Research Forum in Atlanta, Georgia. The theme was Planting the Seeds for Future Research. The goals of the Forum were to identify and prioritize TB behavioral and social science research gaps; to use that information to develop a feasible, goal-oriented research agenda that will guide TB behavioral and social science activities over a 5-year period; and to foster productive partnerships and ongoing communications between national, state, and local governmental and nongovernmental behavioral and social science researchers focusing on tuberculosis (TB). The Forum brought together over 60 academicians, researchers, TB controllers and program staff, and CDC representatives. The expectation was that their varied perspectives would contribute to the development of a research agenda addressing high priority behavioral and social aspects of TB prevention and control. The Forum was convened to address the need for further TB behavioral and social science research, as called for in the Institute of Medicine's 2000 report Ending Neglect: The Elimination of Tuberculosis in the United States. The Forum builds on the precedent of a 1994 workshop sponsored by CDC, the National Institutes of Health, and the Health Resources and Services Administration, Tuberculosis and Behavior: National Workshop on Research for the 21st Century." - p. 1 ; Section I. Introduction and Background -- -- Section II. Presentations and Panel Discussions -- Welcome Address: Opening Remarks / Harold Jaffe -- Welcome Address: Behavioral and Social Science Research in Tuberculosis Control / Kenneth Castro -- Welcome Address: Behavioral and Social Sciences in Tuberculosis Elimination / Wanda Walton -- Keynote Session: When Sacred Cows Become the Tiger's Breakfast: Defining A Role for the Social Sciences in Tuberculosis Control / Jessica Ogden -- Keynote Session: Behavior, Society and Tuberculosis Control / Masae Kawamura -- Preliminary Results from the Tuberculosis Behavioral and Social Science Literature Review / Cathy Rawls, Cristina Booker -- Neighborhood Health Messengers: Using Local Knowledge, Trust, and -- Relationships to Create Culturally Effective Tuberculosis Education and Care for Immigrant and Refugee Families / Stefan Goldberg -- Psychosocial, Social Structural, and Environmental Determinants of Tuberculosis Control / Donald E. Morisky -- Community Perspectives in Tuberculosis Control and Elimination: the Personal Experiences of Patients and Providers Panel Discussion / Robin Shrestha-Kuwahara; representatives from DeKalb County and Fulton County Public Health Departments -- Group Discussion of Themes and Issues from Day One / Mark Nichter -- Breakout Group Sessions I: Identifying Research Gaps and Needs -- Turning Research into Practice Panel Discussion / Jane Mezoff -- Sharpening the Focus on Turning Research into Practice: The Promise of Participatory Research Approaches / Shawna Mercer -- Two CDC Models from HIV Prevention: Replicating Effective Programs and Diffusion of Effective Behavioral Interventions / Agatha Eke -- Effective Intervention for Asthma / Leslie Boss -- Potential Funding Opportunities / Kathryn O'Toole -- Closing Remarks: Maintaining the Momentum on Development of a Tuberculosis Research Agenda / Nick DeLuca -- -- Section III. Results of Breakout Groups Sessions -- Identification of Tuberculosis Behavioral and Social Science Research Gaps and Needs -- Outline of Major TB Behavioral and Social Science Research Topics and Subtopics Identified at the Forum -- Descriptions of Major TB Behavioral and Social Science Research Topics and Subtopics Identified at the Forum -- -- Section IV. Appendices -- Appendix A: Forum Agenda -- Appendix B: Presentation Slides -- Appendix C: TB Behavioral and Social Science Research Gaps and Needs: -- Major Research Topics, Subtopics, and Research Questions -- Appendix D: Participant List -- Appendix E: References ; Forum held in Atlanta, GA, December 10-11, 2003. ; Forum Proceedings prepared by the Communications, Education, and Behavioral Studies Branch, Clinical and Health Systems Research Branch, Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Public Health Applications and Research Area, Abt Associates, Inc. ; Title from title screen (viewed on July 8, 2009). ; Mode of access: Internet from the CDC web site. ; Includes bibliographical references (p. 128). ; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Tuberculosis Behavioral and Social Science Research Forum: Planting the Seeds for Future Research. Proceedings of the Tuberculosis Behavioral and Social Science Research Forum; December 10-11, 2003; Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2005.
BASE
In: NBER Working Paper No. w21868
SSRN
In: Advances in Applied Sociology: AASoci, Band 6, Heft 12, S. 400-419
ISSN: 2165-4336
In: Journal of information technology & politics: JITP, Band 4, Heft 4, S. 31-46
ISSN: 1933-169X
In: Science and public policy: journal of the Science Policy Foundation, Band 24, Heft 4, S. 214-222
ISSN: 1471-5430
In: Science and public policy: journal of the Science Policy Foundation, Band 49, Heft 4, S. 632-642
ISSN: 1471-5430
This paper wants to shed light on organizational factors as conditions for the impact of academic research in social sciences. Organizations play a role as enablers of social impact, providing conditions that improve the probability of impacting on society. We try to ascertain whether this role is supported and stimulated through institutional entrepreneurship, changing the institutions' organizational features, ideas, and beliefs to increase productive interactions and knowledge translation. Our work centres on exploring the actors' social position and their ability to introduce changes that are likely to permanently engage the organizations in the pursuit of social impact and possibly support it in the long run. The empirical basis consists of three case studies about research projects in the social sciences, which brought together academic researchers from different universities and stakeholders. The analysis demonstrates that understanding impact requires adopting a broader perspective, considering also the transformations emerging at the organizational level.
This paper introduces the challenges of studying parliamentary institutions in Southeast Asia. My focus of research is in three countries' institutions: national parliaments of Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore. While in Southeast Asia, it is widely known that studying issues of politics and institutions face challenges – compared to studying culture, for example, this view is arguably no longer valid, however with certainqualification.The comparison of parliamentary tradition between three countries – based on observation of the plenary session - reveals that the effectiveness of parliamentary works is related to parliamentary procedure, and even to the culture of work in the countries. Parliamentary structure, procedure and their political culture matters. Therefore, acknowledging these factors will give rise to more research opportunities, if a researcher plans to study the political institution in other countries in Southeast Asia.
BASE