A TALE OF TWO REALISMS: EXPANDING THE INSTITUTIONS DEBATE
In: International studies quarterly: the journal of the International Studies Association, Band 41, Heft 1, S. 1-32
ISSN: 0020-8833, 1079-1760
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE STUDY OF INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTIONS HAVE CREATED A NEED AND OPPORTUNITY FOR RESTATING THE TRADITIONAL REALIST VIEW OF THE ROLE OF INSTITUTIONS IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS. IN AN ATTEMPT TO SHOW THAT PRE-WALTZIAN REALISTS HAD MUCH TO SAY ABOUT INSTITUTIONS, THIS ESSAY REVIEWS THE NEOREALIST /NEOLIBERAL DEBATE OVER INSTITUTIONS, CLARIFIES THE BASIC DIFFERENCES BETWEEN TRADITIONAL REALISM AND NEOREALISM, AND RESURFACES TRADITIONAL REALIST ARGUMENTS CONCERNING THE NEOREALISM, AND RESURFACES TRADITIONAL REALIST ARGUMENTS CONCERNING THE EFFECTS OF STATE POWER AND INTEREST ON INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTIONS AND GLOBAL ORDER. COMBINING INSIGHTS F BOTH TRADITIONAL REALISM AND NEOREALISM, AND MODEL IS CONSTRUCTED THAT CONSIDERS HOW THE CHARACTERISTICS OF STATES, THEIR INTERACTIONS, AND THE STRUCTURE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM FACILITATE UNDERSTANDING THE WAYS IN WHICH POWER WILL BE EXERCISED, THE TYPE OF GLOBAL ORDER THAT WILL BE PRODUCED, AND THE LEVEL OF GLOBAL INSTITUTIONALIZATION THAT CAN BE EXPECTED.