Suchergebnisse

Le Service Social International (S.S.I.) est un organisme non gouvernemental dont le siège est à Genève.
Le Service Social d'Aide aux Emigrants (S.SA.E.) en est la branche française.

Die Internationale Rotkreuz- und Rothalbmond-Bewegung wurde bereits im 19. Jahrhundert gegründet und besteht aus dem Internationalen Komitee vom Roten Kreuz (IKRK), den derzeit 186 Nationalen Rotkreuz- und Rothalbmond-Gesellschaften und deren Dachverband, der Internationalen Föderation der Rotkreuz- und Rothalbmond-Gesellschaften. Das IKRK koordiniert die Hilfen für die Opfer von bewaffneten Konflikten, beispielsweise in Darfur, während die Nationale Gesellschaft im betroffenen Land oder die Internationale Föderation diese Koordinierung der Hilfe außerhalb von bewaffneten Konflikten, etwa in den Flüchtlingslagern des Tschad, übernimmt.

Globalization has given rise to a new era of international competition that is best understood by looking at the global organization of industries and how countries rise and fall within these industries. The global value chains framework has evolved from its academic origins to become a major paradigm used by a wide range of international organizations, such as the World Bank, the World Trade Organization, the International Labor Organization, and the U.S. Agency for International Development. Global value chains highlight how new patterns of international trade, production, and employment shape the prospects for development and competitiveness, using core concepts like "governance" and "upgrading." This article illustrates the use of this framework by contrasting the industrial upgrading experiences of China and Mexico, through which China has wrested market share from Mexico in a diverse spectrum of U.S. product markets en route to becoming a dominant global manufacturing power in just a couple of decades. The future of international competition will reflect the consolidation and resilience of global value chains and the determination of emerging economies to continue to upgrade to higher value goods and services within these chains, with a growing emphasis on domestic and regional markets.

AbstractThe concept of the responsibility to protect (R2P) holds that not only do sovereign states have a responsibility to protect their populations, but so too does the international community. The international community is said to be responsible for encouraging and assisting states to protect and also for taking collective action to enforce the protection of populations in instances where states fail to carry out their obligations. This idea that the international community itself bears not merely a right but a responsibility to protect, through military intervention if necessary, is perhaps the most novel aspect of the R2P concept, and it would seem to have extraordinary implications. Yet it remains largely under-examined. In this article, I consider how the notion that the international community bears a responsibility to protect might be fruitfully understood and conceptualised. After briefly outlining from where this idea has emerged, I consider two interrelated questions: What kind of responsibility is it – moral, legal, or political, or some combination of the three? And who in particular bears the responsibility – the international community broadly speaking, particular international institutions such as the Security Council, regional organisations, or individual states?

The concept of "common but differentiated responsibilities" (CDR) is receiving increasing recognition in international law. "Common" suggests that certain risks affect and are affected by every nation on earth. These include not only the climate and the ozone shield, but all risk-related global public goods, including peace, public health, and terrorism. In reducing the mutual risks, all nations should "cooperate in a spirit of global partnership." Responsibilities are said to be "differentiated," however, in that not all countries should contribute equally. CDR charges some nations, ordinarily the Rich, with carrying a greater share of the burden than others, ordinarily the Poor.

The appalling loss of life and property resulting from the sinking of the Titanic served to direct public attention both here and abroad not only to the laws which should provide the safeguards of navigation, but also to the incidence of liability for accidents upon the high seas. The former subject has been dealt with in an interesting paper published in this Journal. We here propose to discuss the application to foreign ships, of the United States rule of the limitation of the shipowner's liability, the foreign law upon the subject and the significance of the international movement for reform through identic legislation in many countries.