Hierarchies in World Politics
In: International organization, S. 1-32
ISSN: 0020-8183
841320 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: International organization, S. 1-32
ISSN: 0020-8183
In: https://doi.org/10.7916/D80K284R
On June 28, 1969, a small gay bar in New York City's Greenwich Village neighborhood, The Stonewall Inn, was raided by the police. Rather than the norm of passive consent to the police, the patrons began to fight back leading to an all-out riot in the streets of lower Manhattan. The Stonewall Riot is referred to by many as the turning point in the struggle for gay rights
BASE
SSRN
Working paper
In: The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Political Sociology, S. 315-324
In: Political geography: an interdisciplinary journal for all students of political studies with an interest in the geographical and spatial aspects, Band 30, Heft 2, S. 99-109
ISSN: 0962-6298
In: Journal of international relations and development: JIRD, official journal of the Central and East European International Studies Association, Band 14, Heft 2, S. 151-152
ISSN: 1408-6980
In: Political geography, Band 30, Heft 2, S. 99-110
ISSN: 0962-6298
In: Theories of the Democratic State, S. 155-183
In: Critical Theories of Globalization, S. 89-133
In: Canadian journal of law and society: Revue canadienne de droit et société, Band 20, Heft 2, S. 1-26
ISSN: 1911-0227
RésuméCet article explore les dimensions variées du bureau (office) professoral comme espace 'juridique'. Dans l'une de ses dimensions, l'office d'un professeur n'est qu'un endroit géométrique générique, sans objectif ou occupant, une potentialité formelle. Or, c'est également un site dans la mesure que sa localisation, taille et organisation reflètent une fonctionnalité—des valeurs, processus et institutions décisionnelles qui déterminent son occupation. En plus, l'office exprime un rôle et une scène sur laquelle les occupants interagissent avec des collègues, des étudiants, des étrangers de manière à confirmer ou infirmer des relations de pouvoir et de subordination. L'office professoral a aussi une dimension performative dans laquelle la normativité d'une communauté—de professeurs, employés et étudiants—est imaginée et agie. Par ailleurs, dans une autre dimension, il s'agit d'un espace rituel où des professeurs travaillent, se détendent, réfléchissent et contemplent réflexivement des modèles et formes de pensées. Un tel office existe où que ses occupants choisissent de le tenir. Finalement, l'office est un non-lieu de découverte personnelle—l'indication d'un espace qui n'est que dans les relations qu'il crée et qui le créent.
In: Partisan Histories, S. 1-14
In: Res publica: politiek-wetenschappelijk tijdschrift van de Lage Landen ; driemaandelijks tijdschrift, Band 45, Heft 2-3, S. 325-348
ISSN: 0486-4700
The main drawback of the public-policy contest is that the notion of contest success function, a crucial component of the contest model, does not have micro-foundations and, therefore, the random behavior of the government seems ad-hoc. In the present paper we propose a partial micro-foundation for the public-policy contest. The possible rationalization of random government behavior is illustrated in the case of the all-pay auction and Tullock's lottery logit functions. We also clarify how stake asymmetry, lobbying-skill asymmetry and return to lobbying effort determine the relative desirability, from the government's point of view, of these CSFs
BASE
In: Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, Band 158, Heft 4, S. 731
In: Political psychology: journal of the International Society of Political Psychology, Band 22, Heft 2, S. 309-330
ISSN: 1467-9221
The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the political nature of laboratory experiments. Such experiments can be construed as paradigms of power, open to construction and debate, where different agents and interests are involved in a process of struggle over both (re)presentation and substance. Experimenters should take a reflexive perspective on their own role and power in producing results, and they should recognize that participants in experiments take into account power relations and accordingly modify behavior that is visible or accountable to powerful others (the "panopticon"). This argument is illustrated by recent research on intergroup behavior, which suggests that biases often taken at face value reflect strategic responses to the situation that balance social reality with social resistance.