Jurisdiction of the WTO
In: Proceedings of the 98th Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law, pp. 142-147, 2004
2539151 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Proceedings of the 98th Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law, pp. 142-147, 2004
SSRN
In: The Department of State bulletin: the official weekly record of United States Foreign Policy, Band 82, S. 35-38
ISSN: 0041-7610
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 62, Heft 4, S. 975-976
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: Scandinavian Studies in Law Vol. 66
SSRN
In: Hamburg studies on maritime affairs 34
In: SpringerLink
In: Bücher
This book focuses on maritime employment from a private international law perspective. The first chapter analyzes the background against which international jurisdiction and conflict of laws rules are drawn up and examines uniform law in this context, in particular the 2006 Maritime Labour Convention and the 2007 ILO Convention No. 188 on Work in Fishing. The second chapter addresses international jurisdiction issues as regards individual employment contracts, while also exploring other issues (e.g. insolvency-related and social security matters) that are subsequently revisited in the third chapter while discussing conflict of laws issues related to said contracts. In turn, chapter four focuses on collective labour relations and private international law, i.e. collective agreements, strikes and other forms of collective action and information, and on the participation rights of employees in business matters
In: Netherlands international law review: NILR ; international law - conflict of laws, Band 43, Heft 3, S. 413
ISSN: 1741-6191
In: Netherlands Yearbook of International Law Ser, 47
International law holds a paradoxical position with territory. Most rules of international law are traditionally based on the notion of State territory, and territoriality still significantly shapes our contemporary legal system. At the same time, new developments have challenged territory as the main organising principle in international relations. Three trends in particular have affected the role of territoriality in international law: the move towards functional regimes, the rise of cosmopolitan projects claiming to transgress state boundaries, and the development of technologies resulting in the need to address intangible, non-territorial, phenomena. Yet, notwithstanding some profound changes, it remains impossible to think of international law without a territorial locus. If international law is undergoing changes, this implies a reconfiguration of territory, but not a move beyond it. The Netherlands Yearbook of International Law was first published in 1970. It offers a forum for the publication of scholarly articles of a conceptual nature in a varying thematic area of public international law.--
In: 128 Dickinson Law Review (Penn State), Forthcoming
SSRN
SSRN
In: Nutshell series
Application and relevance of international law -- Sources of international law -- States and international organizations -- International dispute settlement -- International law of treaties -- Rights of individuals -- Foreign relations law in the United States -- Exercise of national jurisdiction -- Immunities from jurisdiction -- Law of the sea -- International environmental law -- Use of force and arms control -- International legal research
In: International courts and tribunals series
In: Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, Band 40, Heft 3, S. 2024
SSRN
In: International & comparative law quarterly: ICLQ, Band 51, Heft 1, S. 1-15
ISSN: 0020-5893
In: Netherlands international law review: NILR ; international law - conflict of laws, Band 32, Heft 3, S. 493
ISSN: 1741-6191
The rise of digital information communication technology has major implications for how states wield coercive power beyond their territorial borders through the extraterritorial geographies of data flows. In examining the geopolitics of data, transnational surveillance, and jurisdiction, this collection makes a significant contribution to the field of global internet governance. It shows how the internet is a forum for geopolitical struggle with states weaponising jurisdiction and exerting power beyond their own borders directly, and via infrastructures owned and operated by transnational technology companies. These dynamics challenge existing conceptual and theoretical categories of contemporary law across the fields of international relations, criminology, and digital media, and raise urgent questions about if and how individual rights can be protected in an era of ubiquitous transnational surveillance conducted by private companies and governments alike.
BASE