Suchergebnisse

The present article is based on that using jurisprudential texts, the strategy of invitation and diplomacy can be proposed to improve the international security situation. The strategy of invitation and diplomacy seeks to persuade the other party to the correctness of an idea, policy and action. In other words, this strategy does not seek to suppress the actor on the other side, but through dialogue and diplomacy, the will to accompany, replaces the will to oppose. Since conflict is a feature of international relations¸ the interests of international actors are often at odds with each other, in which case diplomacy avoids any military confrontation or war by reducing the level of conflict. Applying a conversation and invitation strategy means that in its interactions with other governments, the Islamic State seeks to use tools such as diplomacy, negotiation, consultation, increased cooperation with other countries, and the promotion of cultural interactions with the aim of increasing understanding at the international level. Islamic political jurisprudence, by laying foundations such as the Treaty of Amman at the height of the conflict between the Islamic State and the state and non-Muslim communities, makes it possible to reopen the horizons of diplomacy. The rule of compiling hearts with the aim of persuading and attracting hearts in the foreign interactions of the Islamic State is another principle that is also proposed in the same direction of the strategy of invitation and diplomacy. This strategy can be extracted with an inferential approach to jurisprudence.

The Simla Convention of 1914, held between Great Britain, China, and Tibet, demarcated the border between India and Tibet and gave birth to the McMahon Line. This volume critically examines the legacy of the 1914 Convention and explores its relevance in scholarly discourse about the status of Tibet and Sino-Indian relations more than a hundred years later. The book discusses the significance of the Simla Convention, both in terms of the geopolitics of boundaries as well as the people and the liminal borderlands they occupy, encapsulating the culture and diversity of the trans-Himalayan regions.The bookexplicates how colonial legacies, namely, the 1914 Simla Convention, have become virtual straitjackets, hardening the positions on the boundaries between India and China. It also looks at the debilitating consequences of the nation-state framework on more substantial investigations of the borderlands. Rich in archival material and drawing from the authors' fieldwork in the Himalayan regions, this book analyses muted voices of the inhabitants of the region to bring into focus the larger question of the political, economic, religious, ecological, and social life of the Himalayan peoples, which has enormous implications for both India and China. This volume will be of interest to students of history, international relations, sociology, strategic studies, Asian studies, and anthropology.

Gerechtigkeitsbelange treten in den internationalen Beziehungen häufig auf. Sie sind in allen Verhandlungen präsent und daher ein Kernbestandteil internationaler Diplomatie. Einen Gegenstand mit dem Etikett 'Gerechtigkeit' zu versehen, kann in derselben Weise als Sprechakt analysiert werden, wie der Vorgang der 'Versicherheitlichung' ('securitization'). 'Justization' definiert eine Sachfrage als moralisch relevant, emotional belastet und nur bedingt kompromissfähig. Der Sprechakt signalisiert internationalen Partnern eine harte Verhandlungsposition und dient der Mobilisierung der einheimischen Öffentlichkeit. Ist es zur 'Justization' gekommen, so haben Diplomaten und politische Führungen später Probleme, Verhandlungskompromisse an die Öffentlichkeit zu verkaufen, die zuvor mit Gerechtigkeitsansprüchen mobilisiert wurde. Öffentliche Diplomatie, in der Gerechtigkeitsbelange auftreten, macht daher Einigungen schwieriger. Da Gerechtigkeitsvorstellungen in kulturellen Traditionen verankert sind, die sich erheblich unterscheiden können, ist für Verständigung, Kompromiss und Lösungen die Brückenbildung über die Kulturgrenzen hinweg nötig. Das ist zwar nicht unmöglich, ist aber zugleich eine gewaltige Aufgabe. Der Autor beschäftigt sich in seinem HSFK-Arbeitspapier mit der Analyse von 'Justization' und ihren Folgen, die einen Wissenszuwachs über das Wesen von Verhandlungen verspricht, indem sie den herkömmlichen Interessenanalysen eine wichtige moralische Dimension hinzu fügt.

This book assesses how progress in disarmament diplomacy in the last decade has improved human security. It€examines moral and normative progress in international relations by investigating three cases: the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT); the ban on cluster munitions; and the international regime on small arms and light weapons.

Contributors from Japan, Korea, and China explore the reaction of the United Nations to emerging global issues. A collaboration between the Japan Association for United Nations Studies with the Korea Academic Council on the United Nations System and the China Academic Net for United Nations Studies, this book presents a range of perspectives from both academics and practitioners. The areas explored and discussed include global governance, peace and security, global health governance, global citizenship, nuclear disarmament, and the Sustainable Development Goals. In particular and among other issues it addresses both the coordination of COVID-19 management and responses to Russia's invasion of Ukraine. An invaluable, diverse, and concertedly non-Western approach to the challenges facing the UN.

The article looks at one of the central arguments of Patrick Jackson's book The Conduct of Enquiry in International Relations: the attempt to advance methodological pluralism and dialogue among contending metatheoretical schools of International Relations. The article supports the goal of pluralism but argues that there is a significant gap in Jackson's support of it and that his version of pluralism inhibits metatheoretical engagement of different schools of thought. The latter in turn limits the possibility of progress in the field. The article outlines the missing steps in Jackson's argument, the way in which he unduly limits the contribution that the philosophy of science can make to scientific progress and an alternative argument for pluralism that leaves a role for genuine philosophical engagement and the possibility of progress in IR. Adapted from the source document.