Property rights and reconstruction in the Bosnian return process
In: Forced migration review, Heft 50
ISSN: 1460-9819
Annex 7 of the Dayton Peace Agreement represented a breakthrough in the history of conflict settlement. It stated for the first time that displaced persons should be able not just to repatriate to their country of origin but to return to their actual pre-war homes. The tension between the rights-based approach implied in the Dayton Peace Agreement and the moral imperative of reversing ethnic cleansing becomes clearer when considering the position in which rural returnees were put. There is no doubt that the international community faced a fundamental dilemma regarding minority returns in Bosnia and Herzegovina but, in pursuit of the goal of reversing ethnic cleansing, people's right to choose was, to a large extent, sidelined. This requires a profound re-thinking within the international community, particularly so considering the relatively poor results achieved in terms of reversing ethnic cleansing. A policy which took into account individual motivations and constraints, as well as more in line with the recognition of people's right to choose enshrined in Annex 7. Adapted from the source document.