Suchergebnisse

OBJECTIVE To analyze the types of articles and authorship characteristics of three orthodontic journals--American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (AJODO), The Angle Orthodontist (AO), and European Journal of Orthodontics (EJO)--published between 2008 and 2012 and to assess the differences in content within this period and an earlier period of 1998 to 2002. MATERIALS AND METHODS Each journal's content was accessed through the web edition. From each article, the following parameters were recorded: article type, number of authors, number of affiliations, source of article (referring to the first author's affiliation), and geographic origin. Descriptive statistics were performed and selected parameters were analyzed with the Pearson chi-square or Fisher exact test for independence at the .05 level of significance. RESULTS Review of differences between the two periods showed that the number of publications was almost double. The percentages of multi-authored articles increased. Fewer studies derived from the United States/Canada and European Union countries. Increases for articles from non-European Union countries, Asia, and other countries were found. Characteristics of the second period showed that the EJO and AO published more research articles, whereas the AJODO regularly published case reports and other articles. Approximately 75% of all studies derived from orthodontic departments. CONCLUSIONS The publications from 1998-2002 and 2008-2012 were significantly different both in terms of numbers and characteristics. Within 2008-2012 there were notable differences between the three journals concerning the type and origin of the publications.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the types of articles and authorship characteristics of three orthodontic journals—American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (AJODO), The Angle Orthodontist (AO), and European Journal of Orthodontics (EJO)—published between 2008 and 2012 and to assess the differences in content within this period and an earlier period of 1998 to 2002. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Each journal's content was accessed through the web edition. From each article, the following parameters were recorded: article type, number of authors, number of affiliations, source of article (referring to the first author's affiliation), and geographic origin. Descriptive statistics were performed and selected parameters were analyzed with the Pearson chi-square or Fisher exact test for independence at the .05 level of significance. RESULTS: Review of differences between the two periods showed that the number of publications was almost double. The percentages of multi-authored articles increased. Fewer studies derived from the United States/Canada and European Union countries. Increases for articles from non–European Union countries, Asia, and other countries were found. Characteristics of the second period showed that the EJO and AO published more research articles, whereas the AJODO regularly published case reports and other articles. Approximately 75% of all studies derived from orthodontic departments. CONCLUSIONS: The publications from 1998–2002 and 2008–2012 were significantly different both in terms of numbers and characteristics. Within 2008–2012 there were notable differences between the three journals concerning the type and origin of the publications.

The eleventh annual session of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) Administrative Council was held in Geneva from April 25 to May 19, 1956 under the chairmanship of Mohamed Nazir Mirza (Pakistan). The Council decided on a tentative program of ITU conferences which included 1) the Plenipotentiary Conference and the Administrative Radio Conference, to be held together in 1959; and 2) the Administrative Telephone and Telegraph Conference, to be held in Geneva toward the end of 1958, with the final dates to be set by the Plenary Assemblies in September and December of 1956.

Uno de los grandes retos de la Unión Europea para los próximos años es la correcta regulación y control de los flujos migratorios que tienen como destino el territorio comunitario. En este sentido, la entrada y movimiento de los nacionales extracomunitarios y su acceso a los distintos derechos establecidos en las normas comunitarias constituyen una preocupación para el legislador. El control de la entrada de nacionales de terceros Estados, a partir de normas como el Acervo Schengen, o la regulación de los tipos visados junto al establecimiento de modelos de residencia, sus beneficiarios y el reconocimiento de determinados derechos de carácter fundamental, como el derecho a la vida familiar, solucionan muchas cuestiones que se suscitan respecto al derecho a la libre circulación de los ciudadanos extracomunitarios. Sin embargo, es evidente que en este ámbito queda mucho por hacer ya que en una sociedad cambiante como la actual, en plena crisis económica, los factores que determinan el mercado de trabajo, elemento principal en el movimiento de personas de unos Estados a otros, se muestra variable e impredecible y requiere una constanteactualización de las realidades existentes en este ámbito junto a nuevas formas de regulación. Aquí se pretende analizar cuál es la situación actual de esta libertad comunitaria, al observar tanto las normas que regulan cualquiera de los extremos relacionados con esta como la jurisprudencia que está determinando su interpretación y evolución. ; One of the greatest challenges of the European Union in the following years will be the correct regulation and control of migratory fluxes with the EU as their destination. In this sense, the entrance and movement of non-Community citizens and their access to the different rights established by community norms constitute a particular preoccupation for the legislator. Controlling the entrance of third state citizens by using norms such as the Schengen acquis, regulating types of visas, establishing residence models and their beneficiaries, and acknowledging certain fundamental rights, like the right to family life, would solve many questions regarding the right to free circulation of non-Community citizens. Nevertheless, it is clear that a lot remains to be done in this field, for in a changing society such as ours, in the middle of an economic crisis, the factors that determine the work market, a key element in the displacement of people from one state to another, is bound to be variable and unpredictable and requires a constant updating of new forms of regulation to match the existing realities. The present paper analyses the current situation of Community freedom, by observing both the norms that regulate extreme cases and the jurisprudence that determines its interpretation and evolution.

Change and Stability in Global Tax Policy -- Power in International Tax Politics -- Countering Harmful Tax Practices -- The Swift Return of Tax Competition -- The Emergence of Multilateral AEI -- The BEPS Project : Long Live Arm's Length -- From Hegemony to Transatlantic Tax Battle?

Cover; Occhiello; Ringraziamenti; Indice; Introduzione Immigrazione e solidarietà. Spunti di riflessione Agata C. Amato Mangiameli; Parte I Ius migrandi. Dai problemi del passato agli sviluppi attuali; Parole introduttive. La necessità, la quantità/qualità, la causalità Mario Ascheri; I migranti nella dottrina giuridica europea dell'età moderna Maria Rosa Di Simone; Diritto individuale o pericolo sociale? Scienza giuridica ed emigrazione tra Otto e Novecento Michele Pifferi; L'immigrazione: profili di bioetica e biogiuridica Laura Palazzani

Wer eine fachlich fundierte und empirisch gestützte Kritik an der Wirtschafts- und Finanzpolitik von EU und Deutschland zur Kenntnis nehmen will: Hier kann man sie sich holen! Heiner Flassbeck, u.a. früherer Chefvolkswirt von UNCTAD und Staatssekretär unter Lafontaine und sein Mitautor halten mit ihrer Kritik nicht hinter dem Berg. Sie folgen der inhaltlichen Aussage von "Nur Deutschland kann den Euro retten", dass Deutschland eine Schlüsselstellung in der Eurokrise einnimmt, weiten das Untersuchungsgebiet aber auf die Eurozone aus und untersuchen empirisch die Wirtschaftspolitik der EU und der einzelnen Staaten Europas. (Verlagstext)

Introduction -- Private International law, party autonomy and the English 'Dispute resolution' paradigm -- The analogy between arbitration agreements and choice of court agreements : the technique of severability and whether the contractualisation phenomenon distorts the fundamental nature and effects of choice of court agreements? -- Private law or public law? An assessment of the fundamental juridical nature and classification of choice of court agreements -- 'Dispute Resolution' epitomised : the damages remedy for breach of choice of court agreements -- An overview of the case law on the damages remedy for breach of exclusive choice of court agreements : firmly entrenched of a nascent remedy in need of development? -- Assessing the damages remedy for breach of choice of court agreements -- An in-depth examination of the damages remedy for breach of esclusive choice of court agreements under the English common law jurisdictional regime -- The damages remedy and the Brussels I regime -- The Hague Convention on choice of court agreements : qualified mutual trust and the scope for remedies for breach of exclusive choice of court agreements -- English choice of court agreements in the post-referendum legal environment : what lies ahead? -- Conclusions and conributions to knowledge

10 Restricting Free Speech in Times of Terror: An ECHR PerspectiveIntroduction; Freedom of Expression and its Limits: The ECHR Framework; Prohibition and Punishment of Expressions of Support for Separatism and Terrorism: The Turkish Cases; Some Conclusions Based on the Turkish Cases; New Dimensions in the Post-9/11 era: The Transnational Nature of Terrorism and Religious Extremism; Legal Clarity, Foreseeability and Effectiveness: Legislative Struggles on the Issue of Criminalizing Terrorism-Related Speech; Conclusions; 11 The Civilizational Limitation of Freedom of Speech; Introduction