In aktuellen Diskussionen wird Rechtsextremismus häufig als etwas außerhalb der Gesellschaft Stehendes verstanden. Dagegen zeigen Stimmgewinne rechtsextremer, nationalistischer Parteien in Deutschland und Europa ein anderes Bild. Diese Bewegungen lediglich als "Betriebsunfälle" zu interpretieren, verkennt die historischen Kontinuitäten in rechtsextremen Milieus ebenso wie soziale Brüche und ideologische Neuausrichtungen. Die Beiträge des Bandes liefern Ansätze zu einer Gesellschaftsgeschichte des Rechtsextremismus. Zu fragen ist insbesondere, was gestern und was heute Rechtsextremismus ausmachte. Lassen sich soziale und politische Veränderungen im rechtsextremen Milieu seit 1945 feststellen, und welche Ursachen können dafür genannt werden? Welche Akteur*innen prägten und förderten rechtsextreme Bewegungen? Wie reagierten Institutionen und Gruppen, die durch Rechtsextreme bedroht wurden oder diese bekämpften? Der Band erkundet die historische Genese, die Bedeutungen und die gesellschaftlichen Funktionen von Rechtsextremismus nach 1945 bis hinein ins 21. Jahrhundert.
This article analyses one element of corpus delicti of misappropriation of authorship, criminalised in Lithuanian Criminal Code Article 191 – the object (or the protected good) of a crime. The quality of Lithuanian national regulation and the scope of object of misappropriation of authorship, which affects the qualification of the crime, is evaluated by comparing it with other European Union countries' criminal legal regulation of intellectual property.
This article analyses one element of corpus delicti of misappropriation of authorship, criminalised in Lithuanian Criminal Code Article 191 – the object (or the protected good) of a crime. The quality of Lithuanian national regulation and the scope of object of misappropriation of authorship, which affects the qualification of the crime, is evaluated by comparing it with other European Union countries' criminal legal regulation of intellectual property.
This article analyses one element of corpus delicti of misappropriation of authorship, criminalised in Lithuanian Criminal Code Article 191 – the object (or the protected good) of a crime. The quality of Lithuanian national regulation and the scope of object of misappropriation of authorship, which affects the qualification of the crime, is evaluated by comparing it with other European Union countries' criminal legal regulation of intellectual property.
This article analyses one element of corpus delicti of misappropriation of authorship, criminalised in Lithuanian Criminal Code Article 191 – the object (or the protected good) of a crime. The quality of Lithuanian national regulation and the scope of object of misappropriation of authorship, which affects the qualification of the crime, is evaluated by comparing it with other European Union countries' criminal legal regulation of intellectual property.
Introduction to The Problem: The resignation of the regional head and/or vice today is a serious problem, both in the perspective of democracy, law, and even budget politics. Run as regional head and/or vice is a right, but maintaining the mandate after being elected is an obligation. It is compounded by the political direction of the law, which creates a pragmatically oriented political configuration, thus facilitating the resignation process. Of course, this atmosphere, in addition to injuring constituency, also contradicts democracy and the direction of its legal goal.Purpose/Objective Study: This research is based on two problem formulations, first, how is the regulation related to the resignation of the regional head and/or vice in the perspective of legal politics? Second, how are the resignation of the regional head and/or vice seen from a democratic perspective?Design/Methodology/Approach: This research uses a juridical-conceptual approach with a multidisciplinary method. The secondary data is analyzed qualitatively both on a juridical basis (legislation) and conceptually (democratic construction) so that the results will be obtained not only descriptive but also prescriptive.Findings: The regulations that are formed are still very pragmatic in the interests of the party. Therefore, the political configuration is still a preference to accommodate the rights and interests of political elites who seem oligarchic. Furthermore, this attitude of resignation also does not reflect the attitude of a democrat because it only focuses on his rights and annuls his obligations.Paper Type: Research Article
The article presents an analysis of the process of subordination of artistic thinking to ideological dictates, «inscribing» the literary practice of the subject of aesthetic creativity in the format of a single Soviet method.It is proved that at the stage of political structuring of literary and artistic life, strengthening of regulation and unification of creativity, writers in the format of socialist realism are forced to use new tactics and methods, to find ways of adapting. ; У статті подано аналіз процесу підпорядковування художнього мислення ідеологічному диктатові, «вписування» літературної практики суб'єкта естетичної творчості у формат єдиного радянського методу. Досліджено, що на етапі політичного структурування літературно-мистецького життя, посилення регламентації та уніфікації творчості, письменники у форматі соціалістичного реалізму змушені використовувати нові тактики й методи, відшукувати шляхи адаптації.