Suchergebnisse

Mastering Administrative Law is designed as a supplement to law school courses in administrative law or as an introduction to the subject for lawyers trained in other legal systems. The book explicitly and in plain language identifies the functions of the various principles of administrative law. It covers all the basic administrative law topics, including how the administrative process fits into our governmental structure, typical agency procedures (e.g., rulemaking, adjudication, investigation, etc.), important statutes affecting agencies (e.g., the freedom of information act), constitutional limits on legislatures and agencies and the limited but critical role of the courts in helping monitor the process. A number of classroom-tested graphics—charts, tables, diagrams—supplemented this text by identifying essential doctrinal components and illustrating important doctrinal relationships. ; https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/faculty-books/1025/thumbnail.jpg

This is the second event of the Transsystemic Law Series ; In this talk, Dr. Promislow addressed key questions and challenges in pursuing a transsystemic approach to research and teaching administrative law. By outlining some of the moves involved in toggling between state and non-state legal orders in an area of law generally associated with the state, the talk reflected on how a transsystemic approach will address legal principles related to governmental decision-making in Indigenous legal orders, and may also redefine the study of administrative law more generally away from its traditional focus on the principles of judicial review. ; The UVic Graduate Student Law & Society Research Group ; Faculty ; Unreviewed

This survey updates Professor Levinson's 1975 article on the Florida Administrative Procedure Act. The survey examines and reports all appellate decisions, attorney general opinions and 1976 amendments. Collateral to the discussion of the 1976 amendments, the authors focus on and report the results of the first series of amendments enacted in 1975. In addition, a legislatively proposed constitutional amendment, defeated in the last general election, and the implementing bill vetoed by the governor prior to the general election are considered.