Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
15969 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
SSRN
In: Journal of American Arbitration, Band 5, S. 1
SSRN
SSRN
SSRN
Working paper
In: International Arbitration Law Library v.27
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 1, Heft 2, S. 330-341
ISSN: 2161-7953
The distinctive features of human progress in the nineteenth century were the advancement of natural science, discovery and invention, the growth of human freedom and political liberty, the unifying and nationalization of races into independent states and the development of the principle and the extension of the practice of international arbitration.
In: Yearbook of Private International Law, Band X
SSRN
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 60, Heft 2, S. 413-418
ISSN: 2161-7953
Italy-United States Air Transport Arbitration. Advisory Opinion of TribunalAfter a dispute had arisen between the United States and Italy as to the rights of American air lines to operate all-cargo services to Italy, the question was submitted to the arbitral tribunal: "Does the Air Transport Agreement between the United States and Italy of February 6, 1948, as amended, grant the right to a designated airline of either party to operate scheduled flights carrying cargo only?"
In: Oxford Handbook of International Arbitration, Chapter 14, (Thomas Schultz and Federico Ortino Editors). Oxford University Press 2020, Forthcoming.
SSRN
SSRN
In: International Arbitration in Korea (Oxford University Press 2017)
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record. ; The article reexamines the most common academic criticisms of "mandatory" arbitration of consumer disputes. First, it presents the results of an empirical study of "unfair" arbitration clauses, based on a sample of dispute resolution clauses in franchise agreements. The study finds that while some provisions identified by arbitration critics as unfair are common in the sample, others (such as clauses providing for biased arbitrators) are very rare. Second, it describes plausible circumstances under which both parties to pre-dispute arbitration clauses -- even clauses containing "unfair" provisions -- will be made better off by arbitration. Third, it argues that business reputation and arbitration institutions may constrain corporate opportunism in the use of pre-dispute arbitration agreements. Accordingly, increased government regulation of arbitration may be unnecessary, or at least more limited than some have proposed.
BASE