Suchergebnisse

Intro -- Preface -- Contents -- Contributors -- 1 The Need to Preserve Cultural Heritage -- 1.1 Introduction -- 1.1.1 Cultural Heritage as a Driving Force Behind the Development of Regions -- 1.2 Selected Cultural Heritage Preservation Initiatives -- 1.2.1 Central Europe Programme (2014-2020) -- 1.2.2 Citizens' Catalogue of Historic Monuments -- 1.2.3 Eat Your Way Through Edinburgh -- 1.2.4 HeAT-Heritage and Threat (2015-2018) -- 1.2.5 Cultural Heritage and Diversity: STEPS Project -- 1.2.6 Jewish Cultural Heritage Project (2013-2017) -- 1.2.7 Cultural Routes -- 1.2.8 National Register of Historical Rural Landscapes -- 1.3 Summary -- References -- 2 The Italian National Register of Historical Rural Landscapes -- 2.1 Introduction -- 2.2 The National Register -- 2.3 The Investigations -- 2.4 The Major Transformations of the Rural and Forest Landscapes of Italy from Its Unification to the Present Day -- 2.4.1 The Evolution of Agricultural Surfaces -- 2.4.2 The Evolution of Wooded Surfaces -- 2.5 The Analysis of the 123 Study Areas -- 2.6 The National Observatory and the Register of Historical Rural Landscapes -- References -- 3 Cultural Heritage in the Region of Eastern Slovakia -- 3.1 Region of Eastern Slovakia -- 3.2 Slovak Wine Region Tokaj -- 3.2.1 Specific Crops (Grape Varieties) in the Tokaj Region -- 3.2.2 Specific Animals in the Region of Eastern Slovakia -- 3.3 Traditional Cuisine -- 3.3.1 Specific Recipes of Tokaj Wines -- 3.4 Specific Recipes of Meat Products -- 3.4.1 History of Traditional Meat Production -- 3.5 Conclusion -- References -- 4 Agricultural and Food Heritage of the Moravian Region -- 4.1 Czech Republic-Basic Characteristics and Agriculture -- 4.2 Historical Changes in Animal Production and Animal Output -- 4.3 Specific Animals in the Region -- 4.3.1 Cattle -- 4.3.2 Sheep -- 4.3.3 Goat.

Intro -- Contents -- Figures and Table -- Introduction (Alice M. Baldrica, Patricia A. DeBunch, and Don D. Fowler) -- 1. CRM in the Great Basin: Thirty Years On (Don D. Fowler) -- 2. SHPO Perspective on Cultural Resources Management: Lessons Learned (Roger Roper) -- 3. The Past and Future of CRM under the Guise of Section 106 (F. Kirk Halford) -- 4. Programmatic Agreements and the Growing Process of Inclusion (Richard C. Hanes) -- 5. Dry, Dusty Bits: An Informatics Perspective (Eric Ingbar) -- 6. GIS Probability Models: The Ideal and the Real(ized) (Alyce A. Branigan) -- 7. The Status of Great Basin Ethnographic CRM Studies and Reports since 1990 (Ginny Bengston) -- 8. Tribal Consultation in Nevada and Eastern California: A Thirty-Year Program Evolution in the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest (Fred P. Frampton) -- 9. Issues in Great Basin Historic Preservation: One Practitioner's Considerations (Diane L. Teeman) -- 10. Thirty Years of Highway Archaeology and Its Implications (James Bunch and Patricia A. DeBunch) -- 11. Better with Time: Past Challenges and Future Directions in Great Basin Historical Archaeology (Renée Corona Kolvet) -- 12. How's Business? A Review of Forty Years of CRM and the Used-Site Business (William J. Cannon) -- 13. What We Knew Then and What We Know Now: Thirty Years of CRM Archaeology in the Great Basin (Pat Barker) -- 14. Cultural Resource Management in the Great Basin: What Have We Learned? Part II (Alice M. Baldrica) -- References -- Contributors.

AbstractThis article presents a comparative description of the national legislation concerning the protection of cultural property in the various Arab nations and the influence of regional and international agreements. These different legislative schemes are also discussed in the context of attempts to unify the treatment of cultural property among these nations which face similar problems.

PURPOSE: The research question is how effective are the actions taken by National Revenue Administration towards protection of the Polish cultural heritage. ; APPROACH/METHODOLOGY/DESIGN: The article is based on an analysis of the literature on the subject, applicable legal acts, government strategies in the field of protection national polish cultural heritage, interviews with experts and statistical summaries obtained from all departments National Revenue Administration in Poland. In the frame of research theoretical methods were used, e.g., critical analysis of scientific sources and comparison of statistical data and empirical methods, e.g., document analysis, comparative analysis. The project was carried out in accordance with the approved research plan and in accordance with the regulations in the field of ethics of scientific research at the Military University of the Land Forces in Wroclaw. ; FINDINGS: The article reveals tasks realized by the National Revenue Administration in the scope of protecting cultural goods and works of art in Poland. The organizational structure of this institution is discussed, just as legal bases which determine activities of the revenue administration towards combating crime related to illegal transfer and exportation of works of art and of other objects from the category of cultural heritage. The initiatives undertaken as part of international cooperation have been outlined. ; PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The article can be used in creating solutions in other EU countries, which will be aimed at improving the level of protection of cultural heritage in the local, national and regional dimension. ; ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This is one of the first articles that comprehensively presents solutions adopted in a democratic European country in the field of protection cultural goods and works of art by National Revenue Administration in Poland. In the light of the events of the ongoing war in Ukraine, the protection of national heritage is becoming one of the most important issues formative ...

The extent of destruction and appropriation of cultural property in recent armed conflicts, especially those in Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, questions the adequacy of international rules aimed at the protection of cultural property in armed conflicts. This article seeks to examine that problem by analysing the basic international rules devoted to the protection of cultural property in the event of armed conflict.