Interregionalism and global governance: Notes on the EU-Mercosur axis
In: Revista CIDOB d'afers internacionals, Heft 60, S. 119-146
ISSN: 1133-6595
496 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Revista CIDOB d'afers internacionals, Heft 60, S. 119-146
ISSN: 1133-6595
In: Routledge contemporary Asia series
In: Routledge contemporary Asia series, 2
"Focusing on economic, developmental, political and cultural issues in Asia-Europe relations, this book offers a critical assessment of the Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM) process since its inception in 1996. ASEM now brings together all twenty-seven European Union (EU) members, the European Commission, sixteen Asian states and the ASEAN Secretariat. The underlying theme of the book is that the ASEM should be analyzed as an instance of international dialogue - in this case, dialogue between two groups of states from two different regions - rather than as a manifestation of two regions acting jointly to perform specific functions at an 'interregional' level. The conclusion is that with the exception of the discussion on the fight against international terrorism and the cultural dialogue, the Asia-Europe dialogue rarely meets the ideal conditions for international dialogue. The way forward proposed by this book in the conclusion involves a new approach combining the European practices of multilevel governance, variable geometry and several speeds." "This book will be of interest to students and scholars of Asian and European politics as well as comparative politics, international relations, EU external relations and EU-Asia relations."--Jacket
In: Third world quarterly, Band 45, Heft 7, S. 1273-1290
ISSN: 1360-2241
This paper examines the impact of interregionalism on regulatory governance. Specifically, it analyses an underexplored aspect of the negotiation process for an interregional agreement between the European Union (EU) and the Common Market of the South (Mercosur): to what extent and how has this given rise to particular forms of regulatory governance in Mercosur? The paper empirically explores the trade and cooperation agendas involved in trade facilitation and education, and argues that the long negotiation process between the EU and Mercosur has affected the ways in which different forms of regulatory governance are expressed. Still, these show variation across policy issues. Both the type of norm promoted and the capacity-building mechanisms envisaged create a particular ideational and material context, all of which affects the actor constellation and leads in turn to different regulatory governance regimes, yet within the same interregional negotiation process.
BASE
In: Journal of European integration: Revue d'intégration européenne, Band 27, Heft 3, S. 347-364
ISSN: 1477-2280
In: Pacific affairs, Band 79, Heft 2, S. 302
ISSN: 0030-851X
In its external regional policy (European interregionalism), the European Union attaches great importance to Latin-Caribbean America, taking into account its enormous economic, market, human and raw material potential. The European Union is developing cooperation with Latin American countries in a very competitive environment. The United States have the traditional influence in the region. The US for centuries have been involved in the formation of the region. Since 2014, China has pushed the EU to the third place in terms of economic cooperation with Latin American countries. The European Union responds to this competition with a well-structured policy of investment and offers mutually beneficial cooperation to Latin American regional institutions. The EU heeds the new requests of the Latin American regional community. This creates certain competitive advantages for the European Union in the region.Key words: European Union, Latin-Caribbean America, European Interregionalism, MERCOSUR, UNASUR, the Andean Community, the San Jose Group, the Rio Group, ALBA, CELAC. ; В своей внешней региональной политике (европейский интеррегионализм) Европейский союз придает важное значение Латинско-Карибской Америке, учитывая ее огромный экономический, рыночный, человеческий и сырьевой потенциал. Европейский союз развивает сотрудничество с латиноамериканскими странами в острой конкурентной среде, прежде всего с США и Китаем. Традиционное влияние в регионе имеют США. В то время как Китай с 2014 г. потеснил ЕС на третье место по объему экономического сотрудничества со странами Латинско-Карибской Америки. Европейский союз стремится противопоставить США и Китаю в регионе хорошо структурированную политику инвестиций и взаимовыгодного сотрудничества с латиноамериканскими региональными институтами, учитывающую новые запросы латиноамериканского регионального сообщества. Это придает Европейскому союзу определенные конкурентные преимущества в регионе.Ключевые слова: Европейский союз, Латинско-Карибская Америка, европейский интеррегионализм, Сообщество латиноамериканских и карибских государств, МЕРКОСУР, УНАСУР, Андское сообщество, группа Сан-Хосе, группа Рио, АЛБА.
BASE
In: Journal of European integration: Revue d'intégration européenne, Band 27, Heft 3, S. 249-262
ISSN: 1477-2280
This article introduces the topic of this special issue, namely the study of the EU as a global actor & the role of interregionalism. It starts with mapping out the general theme & the key questions that guide the issue, such as: to what extent are regions becoming 'actors' of world politics; what is the strength of interregionalism in the EU's foreign policies towards regions & across sectors; why is interregionalism being pursued & who are the actors driving such policy; & what are the implications for world order & global governance? Region-to-region interactions are no novelty, as such, but they have only recently started to emerge on a more comprehensive scale. Interregionalism is related to changes in world order & needs therefore to be historically situated. The authors suggest that interregionalism needs to be related both to globalization & to the restructuring of the nation-state, but above all to 'the regionalist movement'. In the second section, the emergence of interregionalism is presented from an historical perspective & the concept of interregionalism is discussed. The article ends with a brief overview of the structure & content of the special issue as a whole. References. Adapted from the source document.
In: Globalisation, Europe, multilateralism
The unintended consequences of interregionalism : new concepts for understanding theentanglements of regionalisms / Elisa Lopez Lucia and Frank Mattheis -- Overlapping regionalism and the unintended consequences of democracy clauses in the Americas / Haroldo Ramanzini Junior -- The unintended consequences of interregionalism on actorness of the European Union : the case of EU-ASEAN cooperation in disaster management / Giulia Tercovich -- The EU-CELAC Cooperation Programme on Drugs Policies and the unintended consequences of interregional interactions / Carolina Salgado -- The ASEAN way versus EU maritime multilateralism : the unintended consequences of EU-ASEAN maritime security cooperation / Dominik Giese -- Between bilateralism and interregionalism : EU-Brazil strategic partnership and the unintended consequences for EU-MERCOSUR relations / Bruno Theodoro Luciano -- The unintended consequences of regional security cooperation in West Africa-EU relations beyond the African Peace and Security Architecture / Friedrich Plank -- The Sahel as an unintended region : competing regionalisms and insecurity dynamics / Edoardo Baldaro -- Agential constructivism, shadow regionalisms and interregional dynamics in the Horn of Africa / J. Andrew Grant, Abdiasis Issa, and Badriyya Yusuf -- When external drivers of regional integration turn into actors of regional disintegration : regionalism and interregionalism in the South Caucasus / Giulia Prelz Oltramonti -- The unintended consequences of neighbourhood policies by the European Union and Russia : region-building in Moldova in an interregional context / Johann Wolfschwenger.
In: Journal of common market studies: JCMS, Band 50, Heft 5, S. 856-857
ISSN: 0021-9886
In: European foreign affairs review, Band 11, Heft 2, S. 223-243
ISSN: 1875-8223
In: European foreign affairs review, Band 11, Heft 2, S. 223-243
ISSN: 1384-6299
World Affairs Online
In: Latin America and East Asia - attempts at diversification, S. 183-196
In: Journal of European Integration, Band 27, Heft 3, S. 249-262
SSRN