Kritik und Umschau: Der Prototyp des politischen Professors
In: Liberal: das Magazin für die Freiheit, Band 53, Heft 2, S. 77-78
ISSN: 0459-1992
6572 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Liberal: das Magazin für die Freiheit, Band 53, Heft 2, S. 77-78
ISSN: 0459-1992
In: Sociologie: tijdschrift, Band 7, Heft 1, S. 102-105
ISSN: 1875-7138
In: Forum for social economics, Band 38, Heft 2-3, S. 135-151
ISSN: 1874-6381
In: Journal of educational sociology: Kyōiku-shakaigaku-kenkyū, Band 35, Heft 0, S. 134-145,en234
ISSN: 2185-0186
In: Journal of vocational behavior, Band 8, Heft 3, S. 337-348
ISSN: 1095-9084
In: Current History, Band 1, Heft 1, S. 188-192
ISSN: 1944-785X
In: Villanova Law Review, Band 65
SSRN
Working paper
Blog: Reason.com
My new article on the First Amendment and controversial faculty speech
In: Harvard Law School John M. Olin Center Discussion Paper No. 995
SSRN
In: Economics of education review, Band 66, S. 137-141
ISSN: 0272-7757
SSRN
Working paper
Many academics misunderstand public life and the conditions under which policy is made. This article examines misconceptions in three major academic traditions—policy as science (e.g., 'evidence-based policy'), normative political theory, and the mini-public school of deliberative democracy—and argues that the practical implications of each of these traditions are limited by their partial, shallow and etiolated vision of politics. Three constitutive features of public life, competition, publicity and uncertainty, compromise the potential of these traditions to affect in any fundamental way the practice of politics. Dissatisfaction with real existing democracy is not the consequence of some intellectual or moral failure uniquely characteristic of the persona publica, and attempts to reform it are misdirected to the extent that they imagine a better public life modeled on academic ideals.
BASE
In: The political quarterly: PQ, Band 83, Heft 3, S. 532-541
ISSN: 0032-3179
In: The political quarterly, Band 83, Heft 3, S. 532-540
ISSN: 1467-923X
Many academics misunderstand public life and the conditions under which policy is made. This article examines misconceptions in three major academic traditions—policy as science (e.g., 'evidence‐based policy'), normative political theory, and the mini‐public school of deliberative democracy—and argues that the practical implications of each of these traditions are limited by their partial, shallow and etiolated vision of politics. Three constitutive features of public life, competition, publicity and uncertainty, compromise the potential of these traditions to affect in any fundamental way the practice of politics. Dissatisfaction with real existing democracy is not the consequence of some intellectual or moral failure uniquely characteristic of the persona publica, and attempts to reform it are misdirected to the extent that they imagine a better public life modeled on academic ideals.
In: Sosiologisk tidsskrift: journal of sociology, Band 18, Heft 3, S. 287-289
ISSN: 1504-2928