Post-Hegemonic Regionalism
In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies
"Post-Hegemonic Regionalism" published on by Oxford University Press.
14949 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies
"Post-Hegemonic Regionalism" published on by Oxford University Press.
In: Routledge Research in International Law
"International Law: Aspects of Regionalism evaluates regionalism in its various relationships and forms with respect to international law, as well as the importance and duties of international law in respect to the establishment and functioning of various forms of regional groups. A great deal of attention has been paid to regionalism from the global, political, ecocomic, security aspects, but a complex evaluation of the impact it has had on international law, and vice versa, is still lacking. The main purpose of this volume is to eliminate this gap and present the latest state of knowledge on the topic. This text will be of interest both to students at an advanced level, academics, and reflective practitioners. It addresses the topics with regard to international law and regionalism and will be of interest to academics dealing with legal aspects of current regionalism and for the specialized courses in the faculties of law, as well as anyone studying diplomacy and international studies, international relations, regional integration law, EU law, international law, and international relations."--Provided by publisher
In: New political economy, Band 5, Heft 3, S. 353-368
ISSN: 1356-3467
In: Rethinking Regionalism, S. 119-131
In: Mirovaja ėkonomika i meždunarodnye otnošenija: MĖMO, Heft 1, S. 3-15
The new trends in the field of regional economic integration, as well as the changing trade and the political configuration of the global economy cannot but affect integration processes within the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS). Russia seems to be somewhat late with the project of a "hard" regional integration involving supranational control formats. The globalization dictates economic feasibility of an open trade and this is increasingly becoming a significant centrifugal factor. Our main task now is to complete as soon as possible the institutional phase of the Customs Union and the Common Economic Space between Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan. Only after accomplishment of this integration project we can start to position it as a full-fledged subject of the world trade policy. Simultaneously, we must emphasize our interest in expanding and deepening the cooperation with the third countries and their groupings, including the RTS format. The same consideration prompts us to be extremely careful and reserved concerning the prospects of enlarging the Customs Union. The only possible Commonwealth-wide integration project format can be "soft" integration. This supposes the establishment of a multilateral free trade area (MFTA) with the elements contained within the modern economic integration agreements.
In: Routledge Contemporary Economic Policy Issues; Regionalism and Globalization
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 57, Heft 1, S. 83-89
ISSN: 0033-3352
In: The European Union and the Regions, S. 269-280
In: Security dialogue, Band 24, Heft 2, S. 211-220
ISSN: 1460-3640
In: Security dialogue, Band 24, Heft 2, S. 211-220
ISSN: 0967-0106
World Affairs Online
In: Journal of Baltic studies: JBS, Band 19, Heft 2, S. 101-116
ISSN: 1751-7877
In: Latin American research review, Band 17, Heft 2, S. 262-276
ISSN: 1542-4278
In: Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte: APuZ, Band 30, Heft 12, S. 39-60
ISSN: 0479-611X
World Affairs Online
In: Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte: APuZ, Band 30, Heft 12, S. 39-60
ISSN: 0479-611X