The South Stream versus Nabucco pipeline race: geopolitical and economic (ir)rationales and political stakes in mega-projects
In: International affairs, Band 86, Heft 5, S. 1075-1090
ISSN: 1468-2346
80 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: International affairs, Band 86, Heft 5, S. 1075-1090
ISSN: 1468-2346
In: International affairs, Band 86, Heft 5, S. 1075-1091
ISSN: 0020-5850
In: Soviet and Post-Soviet Politics and Society v. 46
In: The international spectator: journal of the Istituto Affari Internazionali, Band 58, Heft 1, S. 3-22
ISSN: 1751-9721
World Affairs Online
In: Journal of current Southeast Asian affairs, Band 39, Heft 3, S. 381-404
ISSN: 1868-4882
This article studies the impact of China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) on economic actors in Myanmar. It hypothesizes that the BRI has strong transformative potential, because Chinese projects are likely to transform Myanmar's economy on different scales and influence the allocation of economic benefits and losses for different actors. The study identifies economic actors in Myanmar who are likely to be most affected by BRI projects. It also discusses how BRI-related investments could affect the country's complex conflict dynamics. The article concludes with policy recommendations for decision makers in Myanmar, China, and the international community for mitigating the BRI's possible negative impacts. The analysis draws on secondary sources and primary data collection in the form of interviews with key actors in Hsipaw, Lashio, and Yangon, involved with and informed about the BRI in Myanmar at the local, regional, and national levels. (JCSA/GIGA)
World Affairs Online
This article reviews the literature on the geopolitics of renewable energy. It finds that while the roots of this literature can be traced back to the 1970s and 1980s, most of it has been published from 2010 onwards. The following aggregate conclusions are extracted from the literature: renewable energy has many advantages over fossil fuels for international security and peace; however, renewable energy is thought to exacerbate security risks and geopolitical tensions related to critical materials and cybersecurity; former hydrocarbon exporters will likely be the greatest losers from the energy transition. Many of the reviewed publications share some weaknesses: a failure to define "geopolitics"; an unwarranted assumption that very little has been published in the field previously; limited use of established forecasting, scenario-building or foresight methodologies; a lack of recognition of the complexity of the field; a lack of theorisation. Most authors do not distinguish between the geopolitical risks associated with different types of renewable energy, and only a few distinguish clearly between the geopolitics of the transitional phase and the geopolitics of a post-energy transition world. A disproportionately large part of the literature is dedicated to critical materials and cybersecurity, while only a small part concerns the decline of former fossil fuel powers. Among those publications that do discuss the decline of fossil fuels, there is also an over-focus on oil producers and a lack of attention to the countries that rely heavily on coal, for example Australia, China, Germany, Indonesia, Poland and the United States. ; publishedVersion
BASE
Source at http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su2020475 ; This article examines and compares efforts to reduce energy subsidies in China, India and Russia. Despite dissimilarities in forms of governance, these three states have followed surprisingly similar patterns in reducing energy subsidies, characterised by two steps forward, one step back. Non-democratic governments and energy importers might be expected to be more likely to halt subsidies. In fact, the degree of democracy and status as net energy exporters or importers does not seem to significantly affect these countries' capacity to reduce subsidies, as far as can be judged from the data in this article. Politicians in all three fear that taking unpopular decisions may provoke social unrest.
BASE
In: Central Asian studies series 22
The resource curse and authoritarianism in the Caspian petro-states / Indra Overland, Andrea Kendall-Taylor, Heidi Kjaernet -- Resource nationalism in Kazakhstan's petroleum sector : curse or blessing? / Adil Nurmakov -- Petroleum-fuelled public investment in Azerbaijan : implications for competitiveness and employment / Ramil Maharramov -- Displacement in a booming economy : IDPs in Azerbaijan / Heidi Kjaernet -- Natural gas and authoritarianism in Turkmenistan / Gregory Gleason -- China, energy security and Central Asian diplomacy : bilateral and multilateral approaches / Marc Lanteigne -- In the 'new Great Game', who is getting played? : Chinese investment in Kazakhstan's petroleum sector / Ryan Kennedy -- Just good friends : Kazakhstan's and Turkmenistan's energy relations with Russia / Indra Overland, Stina Torjesen -- Azerbainjani-Russian relations and the economization of foreign policy / Heidi Kjaernet -- The Shanghai Cooperation Energy Club : purpose and prospects / Nargis Kassenova -- Conclusions and further reflections : the logic of authoritarianism in the Caspian petro-states / Indra Overland, Andrea Kendall-Taylor, Heidi Kjaernet
In: Central Asian studies series, 22
Analyzes the nexus of petroleum, security and governance in three semi-authoritarian states in the Caspian region, linking the analysis of domestic and international issues. This book offers an analysis of the impact of oil on the development of this crucial region.
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 80, Heft 1
ISSN: 1891-1757
Norges internasjonale klimapolitikk har alltid hatt som målsetting å oppnå et mest mulig enhetlig globalt klimaregime. Parisavtalen reflekterer i stedet – og bidrar til å forsterke – et fragmentert klimaregime med et mylder av nye samarbeidsformer mellom land. I denne artikkelen trekker vi frem tre trender som preger det nye klimaregimet: et skifte fra klima- til grønn industripolitikk; økende spenning mellom klima- og handelspolitikk; og tettere sammenkobling mellom klima- og petroleumspolitikk. Vi viser hvordan nye klimaklubber både lager nye spilleregler og oppstår som motsvar til disse. Vi ønsker med dette å vise hvordan et fragmentert klimaregime fører til nye rammevilkår og utfordringer for norsk klimapolitikk. Klimaklubbkvalene omfatter både problemstillinger knyttet til hvem Norge skal samarbeide med og hvordan slikt samarbeid skal formaliseres, men også konsekvensene av å samarbeide med noen fremfor andre.
Abstract in English:Norway's Climate Club QuandaryNorway's international climate policy has always aimed at building a unitary global climate regime. However, the Paris Agreement reflects and accelerates the fragmentation of the climate regime and has been accompanied by the emergence of a myriad of new climate initiatives between countries. This article highlights three trends that characterize the emerging climate regime: a shift from climate to green industrial policy; rising tension between climate and trade policy and pressure to merge climate and petroleum policy. We illustrate how climate clubs both create new rules within the climate regime and are formed in response to such rules. Navigating this new international landscape will be a central challenge for Norwegian climate policy moving forward. Norway's climate club quandary in this context implies choices between different political strategies and competing interests and with possible consequences for what type of climate regime Norway will contribute to. The climate club quandary is both related whom Norway seeks to collaborate with and the formalization of such collaboration, but also the consequences of collaborating with some countries and not with others.
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 80, Heft 1
ISSN: 1891-1757
I denne artikkelen undersøker vi om olje- og gassproduksjonen har negativ innvirkning på Norges klimaomdømme. Dette gjør vi ved å kartlegge meldinger som ble lagt ut på Twitter i forbindelse med det 26. klimatoppmøtet (COP 26) i Glasgow. For å sette Norges omdømme i perspektiv, sammenlikner vi Twitter-meldingene om Norge og Sverige. Studien viser at det er liten forskjell mellom meldingene som omhandler Norge og Sverige når det gjelder negative holdninger. Vi finner imidlertid to trekk som er av interesse for forståelsen av Norges omdømme. For det første er meldingene tematisk ulike: De dominerende temaene i meldingene som nevner Sverige handler om å fremme overgangen til grønn energi og klimaaktivisme, mens de dominerende temaene i meldingene om Norge i hovedsak handler om klimafinansiering og behovet for utfasing av produksjon av fossilt brensel. For det andre er de negative meldingene om Sverige av mer generell karakter, knyttet til kritikk av alle lands manglende omstilling, mens de negative meldingene om Norge er spesifikk, knyttet til olje- og gassproduksjon.
Abstract in English:Norway's Climate Reputation on TwitterIn this article we explore whether oil and gas industry negatively affects Norway's climate reputation by analyzing tweets posted during the 26th UN Climate Change Conference of the Parties (COP26) in Glasgow. To make our findings more reliable, we compare tweets about Norway with tweets about Sweden. The results of our study reveal that there is no significant difference in negative sentiment between tweets about Norway compared with tweets about Sweden. However, we find that tweets about the two states differ thematically. While dominant topics in tweets mentioning Sweden are about promotion of the green transition and climate activism, tweets about Norway are mostly about climate financing and the need to phase out fossil fuel production. Furthermore, negative tweets about Sweden are of a more general nature, similar to criticism of all countries not meeting their climate goals, while negative tweets about Norway are specific and related to fossil fuel industry.
This article examines and compares efforts to reduce energy subsidies in China, India and Russia. Despite dissimilarities in forms of governance, these three states have followed surprisingly similar patterns in reducing energy subsidies, characterised by two steps forward, one step back. Non-democratic governments and energy importers might be expected to be more likely to halt subsidies. In fact, the degree of democracy and status as net energy exporters or importers does not seem to significantly affect these countries' capacity to reduce subsidies, as far as can be judged from the data in this article. Politicians in all three fear that taking unpopular decisions may provoke social unrest. ; Publisher PDF ; Peer reviewed
BASE
In: International journal / Canadian International Council: Canada's journal of global policy analysis, Band 65, Heft 4, S. 851-897
ISSN: 0020-7020
Piskunova, E.: Russia in the Arctic: What's lurking behind the flag? - S. 851-864 Øverland, I.: Russia's Arctic energy policy. - S. 865-878 Lackenbauer, P. W.: Mirror images? Canada, Russia, and the circumpolar world. - S. 879-897
World Affairs Online
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 64, Heft 3, S. 445-455
ISSN: 1891-1757
In: Journal of international affairs, Band 73, Heft 1, S. 183-193
ISSN: 0022-197X
World Affairs Online