Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
56 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
SSRN
In: Perspectives on politics, Band 22, Heft 1, S. 131-152
ISSN: 1541-0986
Studies conducted between the 1950s and 1970s found that the principles embodied in the First Amendment constituted a "clear norm" endorsed by large majorities of community leaders and virtually all legal practitioners and scholars. This consensus has since weakened under the strain of arguments that racist slurs, epithets, and other forms of expression that demean social identities are an intolerable affront to egalitarian values. Guided by the theory that norms are transmitted through social learning, we show that these developments have spurred a dramatic realignment in public tolerance of offensive expression about race, gender, and religious groups. Tolerance of such speech has declined overall, and its traditional relationships with ideology, education, and age have diminished or reversed. Speech subject to changing norms of tolerance ranges from polemic to scientific inquiry, the fringes to the mainstream of political discourse, and left to right, raising profound questions about the scope of permissible debate in contemporary American politics.
In: Political behavior, Band 38, Heft 4, S. 951-976
ISSN: 1573-6687
In: Political behavior, Band 38, Heft 4, S. 951-976
ISSN: 0190-9320
In: Political psychology: journal of the International Society of Political Psychology, Band 22, Heft 3, S. 541-570
ISSN: 1467-9221
The relative influence of self‐interest and values on policy preferences was assessed experimentally in a national survey that posed questions about three contemporary political issues—Social Security reform, the home mortgage interest tax deduction, and health care benefits for domestic partners. For each issue, respondents were randomly assigned to one of three priming conditions that influenced the frame of reference for their policy evaluations. The results show that people are more likely to recognize their own self‐interest, and to act upon it, when their stakes in the policy are clear or when they have been primed to think about the personal costs and benefits of the policy. This relationship is somewhat weakened but not eliminated when sociotropic considerations are primed. People with a smaller stake in an issue are less likely to behave on the basis of self‐interest and more likely to be influenced by their values and symbolic predispositions, especially when exposed to information that cues sociotropic concerns, group identifications, or value orientations.
In: Political psychology: journal of the International Society of Political Psychology, Band 22, Heft 3, S. 541-570
ISSN: 0162-895X
In: Political psychology: journal of the International Society of Political Psychology, Band 22, Heft 3, S. 541-570
ISSN: 0162-895X
The relative influence of self-interest & values on policy preferences was assessed experimentally in a national survey that posed questions about three contemporary political issues -- Social Security reform, the home mortgage interest tax deduction, & health care benefits for domestic partners. For each issue, respondents were randomly assigned to one of three priming conditions that influenced the frame of reference for their policy evaluations. The results show that people are more likely to recognize their own self-interest, & to act upon it, when their stakes in the policy are clear or when they have been primed to think about the personal costs & benefits of the policy. This relationship is somewhat weakened but not eliminated when sociotropic considerations are primed. People with a smaller stake in an issue are less likely to choose on the basis of self-interest & more likely to be influenced by their values & symbolic predispositions, especially when exposed to information that cues sociotropic concerns, group identifications, or value orientations. 14 Tables, 2 Appendixes, 20 References. Adapted from the source document.
In: British journal of political science, Band 13, Heft 4, S. 401-440
ISSN: 1469-2112
Two major traditions of belief, democracy and capitalism, have dominated American public life from its inception. Although they have not always coexisted in perfect harmony – indeed their union has often been torn by conflict – they have managed to accommodate to each other with sufficient flexibility to have forged a viable political culture.
In: British journal of political science, Band 13, Heft 4, S. 401
ISSN: 0007-1234
Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory, a book written by Donald Green and Ian Shapiro and published in 1994, excited much controversy among political scientists and promoted a dialogue among them that was printed in a double issue of the journal Critical Review in 1995. This new book reproduces thirteen essays from the journal written by senior scholars in the field, along with an introduction by the editor of the journal, Jeffrey Friedman, and a rejoinder to the essays by Green and Shapiro. The scholars-who include John Ferejohn, Morris P. Fiorina, Stanley Kelley, Jr., Robert E. Lane, Peter C. Ordeshook, Norman Schofield, and Kenneth A. Shepsle-criticize, agree with, or build on the issues raised by Green and Shapiros critique. Together the essays provide an interesting and accessible way of focusing on competing approaches to the study of politics and the social sciences
In: American political science review, Band 106, Heft 2, S. 430-455
ISSN: 0003-0554