Suchergebnisse

As part of the annual surveys in coordinated programmes, the DFG requests data on researchers who are involved in DFG-funded research groups. On the basis of this data pool, the reports focus on three topic areas: distribution according to gender, place of employment prior to joining the group and the funding of researchers involved. The results are considered in differentiated terms. The consideration of developments over time provides an overview of which structures are stable over the five-year period and which are subject to change. Differentiation between the four DFG scientific disciplines highlights differences dependent on the disciplines. The survey data from each reporting year is analysed for this purpose. The data reported to the DFG by the Collaborative Research Centres and Research Training Groups is incorporated into reports and analyses for DFG bodies, funding agencies (federal and state governments) and the public, as well as into independent analyses of funding practice in these programmes. They form an important basis for the reporting of the DFG. ; Selected results from annual surveys of Research Training Groups (RTG)

As part of the annual surveys in coordinated programmes, the DFG requests data on researchers who are involved in DFG-funded research groups. On the basis of this data pool, the reports focus on three topic areas: distribution according to gender, place of employment prior to joining the group and the funding of researchers involved. The results are considered in differentiated terms. The consideration of developments over time provides an overview of which structures are stable over the five-year period and which are subject to change. Differentiation between the four DFG scientific disciplines highlights differences dependent on the disciplines. The survey data from each reporting year is analysed for this purpose. The data reported to the DFG by the Collaborative Research Centres is incorporated into reports and analyses for DFG bodies, funding agencies (federal and state governments) and the public, as well as into independent analyses of funding practice in these programmes. They form an important basis for the reporting of the DFG. ; Selected results from annual surveys of Collaborative Research Centres

As part of the annual surveys in coordinated programmes, the DFG requests data on researchers who are involved in DFG-funded research groups. On the basis of this data pool, the reports focus on three topic areas: distribution according to gender, place of employment prior to joining the group and the funding of researchers involved. The results are considered in differentiated terms. The consideration of developments between 2014 and 2018 provides an overview of which structures are stable over time and which are subject to change. Differentiation between the four DFG scientific disciplines highlights differences dependent on the disciplines. The survey data from the 2018 reporting year is analysed for this purpose. The data reported to the DFG by the Collaborative Research Centres and Research Training Groups is incorporated into reports and analyses for DFG bodies, funding agencies (federal and state governments) and the public, as well as into independent analyses of funding practice in these programmes, such as in these reports. They form an important basis for the reporting of the DFG. ; Selected results from annual surveys of Research Training Groups (RTG)

The report "Exzellenzstrategie des Bundes und der Länder – Statistische Übersichten zu den Förderentscheidungen zu Exzellenzclustern (September 2018)" (Excellence Strategy of the Federal and State Governments – Statistical Overview of Funding Decisions on Clusters of Excellence) describes the draft and full proposal phase up to the award stage in the first competitive round for the funding of new Clusters of Excellence. In addition to presenting key figures on the distribution of projects by region and discipline, it examines topics such as the interdisciplinary nature of the Clusters and the composition of the review groups. During the proposal phase for the Excellence Strategy in 2018, a total of 88 establishment proposals were reviewed in 32 meetings by 385 reviewers from 31 countries. On the basis of these reviews, the Excellence Commission decided in September 2018 to award funding to 57 Clusters of Excellence.

Scientific instrumentation is an essential precondition for universities for a great many disciplines in order to fulfil their manifold responsibilities in research, teaching and patient care. As far as investment is concerned, federal and state governments have contributed to the procurement of major instrumentation since the 1970s on the basis of the shared responsibility set out by the University Construction Act (HBFG). The reform of the federal system in 2006 and the ensuing end of the University Construction Act saw the rearrangement of major instrumentation programmes for universities. They were devised as a result of Articles 91b and 143c of the Basic Law, which cover the joint responsibilities of federal and state governments and financial compensation. The Major Research Instrumentation, Major Instrumentation in Research Buildings and State Major Instrumentation programmes have represented important funding opportunities ever since. The Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) is assigned a review function in these programmes, as previously under the HBFG. The report "Funding for Major Instrumentation – Development from 2007 to 2017" provides a detailed overview of the features of and differences between the programmes. Statistics on the development of major instrumentation programmes with regard to the success rate of proposals, differentiation by subject, applicant and instrumentation categories as well as processing time and reviews of applications, are also examined.

As part of the annual surveys in coordinated programmes, the DFG requests data on researchers who are involved in DFG-funded research groups. On the basis of this data pool, the reports focus on three topic areas: distribution according to gender, place of employment prior to joining the group and the funding of researchers involved. The results are considered in differentiated terms. The consideration of developments between 2014 and 2017 provides an overview of which structures are stable over time and which are subject to change. Differentiation between the four DFG scientific disciplines highlights differences dependent on the disciplines. The survey data from the 2017 reporting year is analysed for this purpose. The data reported to the DFG by the Collaborative Research Centres is incorporated into reports and analyses for DFG bodies, funding agencies (federal and state governments) and the public, as well as into independent analyses of funding practice in these programmes, such as in these reports. They form an important basis for the reporting of the DFG. ; Selected results from annual surveys of Collaborative Research Centres