Black Metropolis
In: The journal of negro education: JNE ;a Howard University quarterly review of issues incident to the education of black people, Band 15, Heft 4, S. 658
ISSN: 2167-6437
57 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The journal of negro education: JNE ;a Howard University quarterly review of issues incident to the education of black people, Band 15, Heft 4, S. 658
ISSN: 2167-6437
In: The journal of negro education: JNE ;a Howard University quarterly review of issues incident to the education of black people, Band 15, Heft 1, S. 75
ISSN: 2167-6437
In: Wildlife research, Band 24, Heft 2, S. 173
ISSN: 1448-5494, 1035-3712
Field trials were conducted in central Australia to evaluate the ability of
various olfactory lures to attract feral cats
(Felis catus L.). Ten food-based lures, one plant
extract and two scent-based lures (anal-gland preparations from male and
female cats) were evaluated on the basis of visitation rates and elicited
behavioural responses. A visual lure composed of bird feathers was also tested
in conjunction with the scent-based lures. One food-based lure (sun-rendered
prawn) and both of the scent-based lures were found to attract feral cats. The
visual lure did not enhance the attractiveness of the scent-based lures. The
possible uses and relative advantages of these lures in control programmes and
in ecological studies of cats are discussed.
In: Man: the journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, Band 4, Heft 4, S. 665
In: The journal of negro education: JNE ;a Howard University quarterly review of issues incident to the education of black people, Band 24, Heft 1, S. 54
ISSN: 2167-6437
In: International journal of the addictions, Band 11, Heft 3, S. 409-416
In: Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, Band 94, S. 12-19
In: Wildlife research, Band 27, Heft 2, S. 143
ISSN: 1448-5494, 1035-3712
We evaluated the efficacy of spotlight surveys
and passive track surveys conducted along roads for assessing the relative
abundance of feral cats and dingoes in a semi-arid rangeland environment in
central Australia. Track surveys were more time-efficient than spotlight
surveys and offered higher precision. We cover a range of issues that need to
be considered when using track-based surveys to assess population change. We
also discuss the merits of other techniques used to monitor the abundance of
mammalian carnivores.
In: Journal of Area Studies, Band 1, Heft 2, S. 174-192
In: Wildlife research, Band 45, Heft 3, S. 247
ISSN: 1448-5494, 1035-3712
Context Feral cats (Felis catus) are a threat to biodiversity globally, but their impacts upon continental reptile faunas have been poorly resolved. Aims To estimate the number of reptiles killed annually in Australia by cats and to list Australian reptile species known to be killed by cats. Methods We used (1) data from >80 Australian studies of cat diet (collectively >10 000 samples), and (2) estimates of the feral cat population size, to model and map the number of reptiles killed by feral cats. Key results Feral cats in Australia's natural environments kill 466 million reptiles yr–1 (95% CI; 271–1006 million). The tally varies substantially among years, depending on changes in the cat population driven by rainfall in inland Australia. The number of reptiles killed by cats is highest in arid regions. On average, feral cats kill 61 reptiles km–2 year–1, and an individual feral cat kills 225 reptiles year–1. The take of reptiles per cat is higher than reported for other continents. Reptiles occur at a higher incidence in cat diet than in the diet of Australia's other main introduced predator, the European red fox (Vulpes vulpes). Based on a smaller sample size, we estimate 130 million reptiles year–1 are killed by feral cats in highly modified landscapes, and 53 million reptiles year–1 by pet cats, summing to 649 million reptiles year–1 killed by all cats. Predation by cats is reported for 258 Australian reptile species (about one-quarter of described species), including 11 threatened species. Conclusions Cat predation exerts a considerable ongoing toll on Australian reptiles. However, it remains challenging to interpret the impact of this predation in terms of population viability or conservation concern for Australian reptiles, because population size is unknown for most Australian reptile species, mortality rates due to cats will vary across reptile species and because there is likely to be marked variation among reptile species in their capability to sustain any particular predation rate. Implications This study provides a well grounded estimate of the numbers of reptiles killed by cats, but intensive studies of individual reptile species are required to contextualise the conservation consequences of such predation.
In: Wildlife research, Band 47, Heft 8, S. 580
ISSN: 1448-5494, 1035-3712
Abstract
ContextWe recently estimated the numbers of reptiles, birds and mammals killed by cats (Felis catus) in Australia, with these assessments providing further evidence that cats have significant impacts on Australian wildlife. No previous studies have estimated the numbers of frogs killed by cats in Australia and there is limited comparable information from elsewhere in the world.
AimsWe sought to (1) estimate the numbers of frogs killed by cats in Australia and (2) compile a list of Australian frog species known to be killed by cats.
MethodsFor feral cats, we estimated the number of frogs killed from information on their frequency of occurrence in 53 cat dietary studies (that examined stomach contents), the mean number of frogs in dietary samples that contained frogs, and the numbers of cats in Australia. We collated comparable information for take of frogs by pet cats, but the information base was far sparser.
Key resultsFrogs were far more likely to be reported in studies that sampled cat stomachs than cat scats. The mean frequency of occurrence of frogs in cat stomachs was 1.5%. The estimated annual per capita consumption by feral cats in Australia's natural environments is 44 frogs, and, hence, the annual total take is estimated at 92 million frogs. The estimated annual per capita consumption by pet cats is 0.26 frogs, for a total annual kill of one million frogs by pet cats. Thirty native frog species (13% of the Australian frog fauna) are known to be killed by cats: this tally does not include any of the 51 threatened frog species, but this may simply be because no cat dietary studies have occurred within the small ranges typical of threatened frog species.
ConclusionsThe present study indicated that cats in Australia kill nearly 100 million frogs annually, but further research is required to understand the conservation significance of such predation rates.
ImplicationsThe present study completed a set of reviews of the impacts of cats on Australian terrestrial vertebrates. Cat predation on Australian frogs is substantial, but is likely to be markedly less than that on Australian reptiles, birds and mammals.
In: Soviet studies, Band 42, Heft 1, S. 149-177