Can learning beyond the classroom impact on social responsibility and academic attainment? An evaluation of the Children's University youth social action programme
In: Studies in educational evaluation, Band 61, S. 74-82
ISSN: 0191-491X
49 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Studies in educational evaluation, Band 61, S. 74-82
ISSN: 0191-491X
In: Studies in educational evaluation, Band 47, S. 83-92
ISSN: 0191-491X
In: Scottish affairs, Band 29, Heft 1, S. 82-97
ISSN: 2053-888X
The Scottish Government has set ambitious targets for widening access to full-time undergraduate degree programmes. Meeting these targets will be a real challenge, not least because young people from socioeconomically disadvantaged contexts continue to lag substantially behind their more advantaged peers when it comes to achievement at Higher level. Following the recommendations of the Commission on Widening Access, the Scottish Government has mandated Scottish universities to set separate entry requirements for contextually disadvantaged applicants, known as 'access thresholds'. In this article, we draw on the findings of a research project commissioned by the Scottish Funding Council to develop an empirical evidence base for the use of access thresholds to widen participation in higher education. We show that access thresholds are mathematically necessary if wider access is to be achieved, and we present evidence demonstrating that applicants admitted with Higher grades lower than the market rate have a high probability of success at degree level. We welcome the widespread use of access thresholds but highlight the scope to be much bolder than is currently the case. We also show that the use of the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) to identify contextually disadvantaged learners runs a high risk of failure to reach the intended beneficiaries. We argue strongly in favour of the use of administratively verified individual level measures of contextual disadvantage instead, specifically receipt of free school meals and low household income.
In: Journal of children's services, Band 10, Heft 3, S. 252-264
ISSN: 2042-8677
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to summarise the results of a review of the literature linking parental involvement in their child's education to attainment at or before primary school.
Design/methodology/approach
– The search involved nine electronic databases supplemented by other sources, and yielded 4,898 apparently relevant reports. Of these, 127 were reports of attempted evaluations to see whether enhancing parental involvement led to higher attainment outcomes for children.
Findings
– None of these studies was a large, robust evaluation. The overwhelming majority (121/127) reported research with serious limitations, and they were almost equally divided between those claiming success and those saying that the intervention had been ineffective or harmful. Of the remaining six, three offered positive outcomes, and these were generally complex interventions in which parental involvement was only part of a package of measures taken to improve results.
Originality/value
– Therefore, the paper has three main messages for an area where practice and policy interventions abound. Research has to improve greatly.