Suchergebnisse
Filter
81 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
SSRN
Working paper
How Not to Argue Against the Crime of Aggression: A Response to Michael Glennon
SSRN
Working paper
A Cultural Theory of International Relations
In: Perspectives on politics: a political science public sphere, Band 8, Heft 2, S. 713-714
ISSN: 1537-5927
Myths of Membership: The Politics of Legitimation in UN Security Council Reform
In: Global governance: a review of multilateralism and international organizations, Band 14, Heft 2, S. 199-217
ISSN: 1942-6720
Myths of membership: the politics of legitimation in UN Security Council reform
In: Global governance: a review of multilateralism and international organizations, Band 14, Heft 2, S. 199-217
ISSN: 2468-0958, 1075-2846
World Affairs Online
Breaking and Making Norms: American Revisionism and Crises of Legitimacy
In: International politics: a journal of transnational issues and global problems, Band 44, Heft 2-3, S. 194-213
ISSN: 1740-3898
Breaking and making norms: American revisionism and crisis of legitimacy
In: International politics, Band 44, Heft 2-3, S. 193-213
ISSN: 1384-5748
World Affairs Online
Breaking and Making Norms: American Revisionism and Crises of Legitimacy
In: International politics, Band 44, Heft 3, S. 194-213
ISSN: 1384-5748
The Strategic Use of Liberal Internationalism: Libya and the UN Sanctions, 1992–2003
In: International organization, Band 59, Heft 3
ISSN: 1531-5088
The strategic use of liberal internationalism: Libya and the UN sanctions, 1992-2003
In: International organization, Band 59, Heft 3, S. 495-526
ISSN: 0020-8183
Die UN-Sanktionen gegen Libyen zu Beginn der 90er Jahre setzten im UN-Sicherheitsrat eine Kontroverse über die Interpretation der zentralen Rechtsnormen in den internationalen Beziehungen in Gang. Internationale Prinzipien wie Rechtstaatlichkeit, Unschuldsvermutung und Respekt vor der Autorität internationaler Organisationen wurden in dieser Kontroverse sowohl von Befürwortern als auch von Gegner der Sanktionen zur Rechtfertigung ihrer Position angeführt. Somit verdeutlicht diese Kontroverse dreierlei: Erstens, wie bedeutend das Prinzip von Legitimität in den internationalen Beziehungen ist. Zweitens, dass dieses Prinzip symbolische Macht verleiht, um die sich jedes Land aus strategischen Gründen bemüht. Und drittens, dass die Verteilung dieser symbolischen Macht keineswegs mit der Verteilung der tatsächlichen, materiellen Macht korreliert. Daher ist es keineswegs unmöglich, dass offensichtlich starke Staaten von offensichtlich schwachen Staaten auf Grundlage der symbolischen Macht in einer internationalen Debatte besiegt werden können. (rll-swp)
World Affairs Online
Of words and wars: the Security Council's hard life among the great powers
In: Seton Hall Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, Band 5, Heft 1, S. 69-75
View that the United Nations Security Council was designed to avoid conflict among the Great Powers, and has been successful in this regard; in context of inability of the UN to stop the US-led war against Iraq. Covers history and establishment of the Security Council, power and legitimacy, and influence of the UN on US foreign policy.
Labour Standards through International Organisations
In: The journal of corporate citizenship, Band 2003, Heft 11, S. 99-111
ISSN: 2051-4700
Of Words and Wars: The Security Council's Hard Life among the Great Powers
In: Seton Hall Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, Band 5, Heft 1, S. 69-75
A fundamental misunderstanding of the nature of the UN Security Council has led to the criticism following the most recent Iraq-US war, which describes the UN opposition as irrelevant & unable to act or effect change. Rather than seeing the Council in moralistic & legal terms, the Council must be viewed in realistic political terms within its historical framework. The Council was primarily established for maintaining peace & avoiding conflict among the Great Powers rather than for protection of the weak from the strong. Thus the veto guarantees inaction precisely when tension is greatest between the Great Powers. The Council has sufficient legitimacy in international politics that its approval was sought by Washington prior to the Iraq War, that countries such as Canada & Turkey followed the UN signals as to whether to support the mission, & that denial of approval realized the more modest set of UN goals & powers in that it reinforced the legal principles of the Charter & raised the costs of unilateralism to a Great Power. This is important because it influences how US foreign policy makers assess US interests in world politics. L. Kehl
Too Legit to Quit
In: Foreign affairs: an American quarterly review, Band 82, Heft 4, S. 204
ISSN: 2327-7793
Legitimacy, Power, and the Symbolic Life of the UN Security Council
In: Global governance: a review of multilateralism and international organizations, Band 8, Heft 1, S. 35-51
ISSN: 1942-6720