Suchergebnisse

1. Politische Techniksteuerung — ein Forschungsprogramm -- Forschungsstrategische Überlegungen zur politischen Techniksteuerung -- 2. Generelle Probleme politischer Techniksteuerung -- Theorien politischer Steuerung — Auf der Suche nach dem Dritten Weg -- Techniksteuerung durch Recht — Vorüberlegungen zu einem forschungspolitischen Desiderat -- 3. Der Nationalstaat als Akteur der Techniksteuerung -- Bestandsaufnahme der Forschungs- und Technologiepolitik -- Evaluation von Technikpolitik -- Introvertierte Verwaltungspolitik als Technologiepolitik -- 4. Die supra- und subnationale Ebene der Techniksteuerung -- Regionale Innovationspolitik im Spannungsfeld von europäischem Binnenmarkt und deutscher Integration -- Die Region als technologiepolitisches Handlungsfeld? -- 5. Neue Ansätze in der politischen Techniksteuerung -- Arbeitsorientierte Technologiepolitik — vergleichende Analyse staatlicher Programme von Arbeit und Technik -- Diskurse in der Technikfolgenabschätzung der Informationstechnik: Der fruchtbare Widersprich von Konsens und Kontrast -- Kritik der "Sozialverträglichkeit". Am Beispiel des NRW-Programms "Sozialverträgliche Technikgestaltung" -- 6. Verbinde als Akteure der politischen Techniksteuerung -- Techniksteuerung durch Verbände. Institutionelles Arrangement und Interessenberticksichtigungsmuster bei der Harmonisierung technischer Normen in Europa -- Interessenvermittlung und Beteiligungsformen von Gewerkschaften und Arbeitgeberverbänden in der staatlichen Forschungs- und Technologiepolitik -- 7. Die Massenmedien als Akteure der Techniksteuerung -- Technikkommunikation als Instrument politischer Techniksteuerung -- 8. Techniksteuerung und industrielles System -- Forschung in der Industrie — Möglichkeiten und Grenzen staatlicher Steuerbarkeit -- Arbeitsregulierung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im Spannungsfeld zwischen nationalen Gestaltungsstrategien und internationaler Produktivitätskonkurrenz -- Autorenverzeichnis.

This deliverable outlines the new Protocol for Science Diplomacy presented in a policy brief which inspires the alignment of shared, cosmopolitan interests and their application to cross-border societal challenges. It comprises a set of twelve procedural and infrastructural principles with which actors can create a space for constructive and productive science diplomacy interactions. These principles are: Sensitivity; Inclusiveness; Transparency; Deliberation; Reciprocity; Complementarity & Manoeuvrability; Legitimacy; Alignment; Evaluation; Capacities; Capabilities; Trust. Our Protocol for Science Diplomacy sets new ground rules for international scientific and policy collaboration that enable us, inter alia, to make meaningful steps towards tackling the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by their 2030 deadline. As such, it offers a roadmap for science diplomacy in the next decade and beyond.

Grand societal challenges require collective action within and across national borders. Effective action is expected from Europe and it requires targeted inter-governmental and diplomatic efforts and the mobilization of appropriate scientific knowledge. Science Diplomacy is a promising mechanism to address these grand societal challenges. We understand science diplomacy generally as collaborations between stakeholders from science, policy and diplomacy, which involve various governmental or diplomatic organizations as well as non-governmental scientific organizations. The complexity arising from the existing variety of mechanisms and stakeholders precludes a clear-cut definition of who should 'do' science diplomacy in what way. And many stakeholders that could be labelled 'science diplomacy organization' would not do so themselves. This presents challenges for organizing the governance of science diplomacy. We suggest here that governing mechanisms for science diplomacy in Europe must observe four premises to be effective. These premises include (a) grand societal challenges require both diplomatic efforts and science-based knowledge, (b) science-based knowledge production is diverse and evolving, (c) diplomacy means reconciling a variety of interests, and (d) Science Diplomacy requires combined science and diplomacy literacy. These premises set the stage for the development of governance mechanisms for Science Diplomacy. Taken seriously, they lead to governance practices that do not pre-define what Science Diplomacy is, but give interested stakeholders the guidance they need to develop effective Science Diplomacy mechanisms themselves. This will be presented in a later policy recommendation brief.

Purpose
How to derive policy implications from five future scenarios of transformed research and innovation (R&I) systems? This paper analyzes methodological and content issues of five future scenarios of transformed R&I systems. The aim of this paper is to provide an outlook on strategic policies capable of facilitating or moderating these transformative changes in R&I practices is discussed in light of overarching intentions to foster "responsible" ambitions (in Europe and beyond, discussed as responsible research and innovation, RRI).


Design/methodology/approach
The paper elaborates a four-step methodology to assess the scenario's policy implications: first, by articulating the scenario implications for six core dimensions of R&I systems; second, an RRI assessment framework is developed to assess in each scenario opportunities and limitations for transforming R&I systems towards responsibility goals; the third involves a cross-scenario analysis of similarities and differences between the scenarios, allowing the identification of robust policy options that make sense in more than one scenario. The last analytical step includes again the richness of the individual scenario assessments aiming to provide a broader outlook on transformative policy orientations.


Findings
The paper concludes with outlining the contours of a future-responsible R&I system together with some suggestions for transformative policy orientations that aim to govern the R&I system towards such a future, as a source of inspiration and reflection.


Research limitations/implications
The analysis is based on five future scenarios that do not systematically cover future developments external to the R&I system.


Practical Implications
An outlook of strategic policies capable of facilitating or moderating these transformative changes in R&I practices is discussed in light of the overarching European Union goal of encouraging the performance of RRI.


Originality/value
This paper provides inspirational anticipatory strategic intelligence for fostering the responsible ambitions of research with and for society.

How to derive policy implications from five future scenarios of transformed research and innovation (R&I) systems? This paper analyzes methodological and content issues of five future scenarios of transformed R&I systems. The aim of this paper is to provide an outlook on strategic policies capable of facilitating or moderating these transformative changes in R&I practices is discussed in light of overarching intentions to foster "responsible" ambitions (in Europe and beyond, discussed as responsible research and innovation, RRI). Design/methodology/approach: The paper elaborates a four-step methodology to assess the scenario's policy implications: first, by articulating the scenario implications for six core dimensions of R&I systems; second, an RRI assessment framework is developed to assess in each scenario opportunities and limitations for transforming R&I systems towards responsibility goals; the third involves a cross-scenario analysis of similarities and differences between the scenarios, allowing the identification of robust policy options that make sense in more than one scenario. The last analytical step includes again the richness of the individual scenario assessments aiming to provide a broader outlook on transformative policy orientations. Findings: The paper concludes with outlining the contours of a future-responsible R&I system together with some suggestions for transformative policy orientations that aim to govern the R&I system towards such a future, as a source of inspiration and reflection. Research limitations/implications: The analysis is based on five future scenarios that do not systematically cover future developments external to the R&I system. Practical Implications: An outlook of strategic policies capable of facilitating or moderating these transformative changes in R&I practices is discussed in light of the overarching European Union goal of encouraging the performance of RRI. Originality/value: This paper provides inspirational anticipatory strategic intelligence for fostering the responsible ambitions of research with and for society.