Australian Democracy: Modifying Majoritarianism?
In: Australian journal of political science: journal of the Australasian Political Studies Association, Band 34, Heft 3, S. 313-326
ISSN: 1363-030X
232 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Australian journal of political science: journal of the Australasian Political Studies Association, Band 34, Heft 3, S. 313-326
ISSN: 1363-030X
In: Representation, Band 36, Heft 2, S. 133-136
ISSN: 1749-4001
In: Australian journal of political science: journal of the Australasian Political Studies Association, Band 34, Heft 3, S. 313
ISSN: 1036-1146
In: Australian journal of political science: journal of the Australasian Political Studies Association, Band 34, Heft 3, S. 313-326
ISSN: 1036-1146
In: Democratization, Band 5, Heft 4, S. 144-150
ISSN: 1743-890X
In: Scandinavian political studies, Band 21, Heft 2, S. 99-108
ISSN: 1467-9477
Five examples of the origin, operation, and consequences of consensus democracy and closely related democratic forms (the politics of accommodation, consociational democracy, and power‐sharing democracy) illustrate the relative strengths of cultural, structural, functional, and rational‐choice explanations. The examples show that each of these explanations plays a crucial role in at least one of the five situations. Hence they suggest that it is unwise to assume that one particular approach predominates to such an extent that it should be the ruling paradigm for political research.
In: PS: political science & politics, Band 31, Heft 1, S. 10-13
Most observers of the United States House of Representatives undoubtedly agree that in many respects, large and small, the House does not perform its representative function very well. Not being an expert on the details and intricacies of House operations, I shall leave the smaller matters—such as incremental steps to reform the financing of election campaigns—to the specialists. Let me focus instead on three major characteristics that makes the House insufficiently representative: (1) its election by plurality, which does not provide adequate representation for minorities and minority views; (2) its election by an unrepresentative electorate, especially in midterm elections when only about one-third of the eligible voters make use of their right to vote; and (3) its comparatively small size of only 435 members.
In: Scandinavian political studies: SPS ; a journal, Band 21, Heft 2, S. 99-108
ISSN: 0080-6757
In: PS: political science & politics, Band 31, Heft 1, S. 10-13
ISSN: 0030-8269, 1049-0965
In: Democratization, Band 5, Heft 4, S. 144-150
ISSN: 1351-0347
In: Electoral Studies, Band 16, Heft 1, S. 73-77
In: American political science review, Band 91, Heft 1, S. 1-14
ISSN: 1537-5943
Low voter turnout is a serious democratic problem for five reasons: (1) It means unequal turnout that is systematically biased against less well-to-do citizens. (2) Unequal turnout spells unequal political influence. (3) U.S. voter turnout is especially low, but, measured as percent of voting-age population, it is also relatively low in most other countries. (4) Turnout in midterm, regional, local, and supranational elections—less salient but by no means unimportant elections—tends to be especially poor. (5) Turnout appears to be declining everywhere. The problem of inequality can be solved by institutional mechanisms that maximize turnout. One option is the combination of voter-friendly registration rules, proportional representation, infrequent elections, weekend voting, and holding less salient elections concurrently with the most important national elections. The other option, which can maximize turnout by itself, is compulsory voting. Its advantages far outweigh the normative and practical objections to it.
In: European journal of political research: official journal of the European Consortium for Political Research, Band 31, Heft 1-2, S. 5-16
ISSN: 1475-6765
In: European journal of political research: official journal of the European Consortium for Political Research, Band 31, Heft 1-2, S. 5-16
ISSN: 0304-4130
World Affairs Online
In: American political science review, Band 91, Heft 1, S. 1-14
ISSN: 0003-0554