Suchergebnisse

This review deals with the chapter about modern Russian Studies in Germany in the collective monograph "Izuchenie Rossii sovremennymi istorikami Zapada i Vostoka", recently published under the editorship of N. V. Trubnikova. Its authors, the Tomsk historians V. V. Ageeva and M. A. Shtanko, have set a promising goal for their research: to approach the German rossievedenie in their overview covering the period from 1975 until 2014 with theoretical-methodological criteria instead of the more common in such cases political ones. In order to realize this project, they proposed to divide modern German historiography into three periods, with the latter one which covers the years 2005–2014 being a no less important innovation. However, it fell short of the reader's expectations. Unfortunately, the chapter "Sovremennoe nemetskoe rossievedenie: spetsifika diskursa, tematicheskie polia i protsess institucionalizacii" is a mere compilation of superficially adapted facts, conclusions and ideas mostly taken from other works. V. V. Ageeva and M. A. Shtanko do not seem to have paid attention to the fact that some of the data they draw on have already lost its actuality. Statistical material serves largely to confirm their own postulates, and most references to German historians and their studies are inaccurate and misspelled, which does not enhance comprehension. Overall, the reader gets the impression that the authors were due to finish their work under some time pressure. This probably would explain why they chose "to take the easy way out" — in the end, the welcoming innovative theses expressed at the beginning of the chapter are abandoned, whereas outdated clichés — confirmed.

This review deals with the chapter about modern Russian Studies in Germany in the collective monograph "Izuchenie Rossii sovremennymi istorikami Zapada i Vostoka", recently published under the editorship of N. V. Trubnikova. Its authors, the Tomsk historians V. V. Ageeva and M. A. Shtanko, have set a promising goal for their research: to approach the German rossievedenie in their overview covering the period from 1975 until 2014 with theoretical-methodological criteria instead of the more common in such cases political ones. In order to realize this project, they proposed to divide modern German historiography into three periods, with the latter one which covers the years 2005-2014 being a no less important innovation. However, it fell short of the reader's expectations. Unfortunately, the chapter "Sovremennoe nemetskoe rossievedenie: spetsifika diskursa, tematicheskie polia i protsess institucionalizacii" is a mere compilation of superficially adapted facts, conclusions and ideas mostly taken from other works. V. V. Ageeva and M. A. Shtanko do not seem to have paid attention to the fact that some of the data they draw on have already lost its actuality. Statistical material serves largely to confirm their own postulates, and most references to German historians and their studies are inaccurate and misspelled, which does not enhance comprehension. Overall, the reader gets the impression that the authors were due to finish their work under some time pressure. This probably would explain why they chose "to take the easy way out" - in the end, the welcoming innovative theses expressed at the beginning of the chapter are abandoned, whereas outdated clichés - confirmed. © 2020 Saint Petersburg State University. All rights reserved. ; This article was prepared within the framework of the state project of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation "Regional Identity of Russia: Comparative Historical and Philological Studies" (Laboratory for the Study of Primary Sources, Ural Federal University) No. FEUZ-2020-0056.

[For the English abstract and full text of the article please see the attached PDF-File (English version follows Russian version)].ABSTRACT The article is devoted to the review of Eurasian integration processes, to the development of transport export-import relations of the Russian Federation, the position of the national transport system in the global transport communications system in the context of the country's participation in international economic associations. The need to find prospects for development of the transport sector is actualized in view of new realities created after the establishment of the Customs Union and Eurasian Economic Union. A model of strengthening transport and transit potential through improvement of customs and transport and logistics management of the transport system is offered. Keywords: economic integration, EEU, SCO, BRICS, transport infrastructure, international transport corridors, transport and logistical support, process model. REFERENCES 1.Pekhterev, F. S. Development and modernization of infrastructure of Russian sections of international transport corridors [Razvitie I modernizacija infrastruktury rossijskih uchastkov mezhdunarodnyh transportnyh koridorov].Information-analytical publication «Infrastructure of Russia», 2012.[Electronic source]: http://federalbook.ru/files/ Infrastruktura/Soderjaniye/V/Pehterev.pdf.Last accessed 06.11.2014. 2.Mosyakina, E.A., Rudneva, L. N. The Eurasian Economic Community and the formation of the Eurasian Economic Union [Evrazijskoe ekonomicheskoe soobshhestvo i formirovanie Evrazijskogo ekonomicheskogo sojuza].Problems of formation of a common space of economic and social development of the CIS countries: Proceedings of International scientific-practical conference.Tyumen, TSOGU publ., 2014, pp.190-194. 3.Kholopov, K.V., Golubchik, A. M. Problems and directions of Russia's integration into the international transport system [Problemy i napravlenija integracii Rossii v mezhdunarodnye transportnye sistemy].Rossijskij vneshneekonomicheskij vestnik, 2011, Iss.10, pp.43-50. 4.Lapidus, B.M., Macheret, D. A. Economy of transport space: methodological bases [Ekonomika transportnogo prostranstva: metodologicheskie osnovy].VestnikVNIIZhT, 2012, Iss.2, pp.3-10. 5.Tonysheva, L. L. Innovative development of Russia's Economy [Innovacionnoe razvitie ekonomiki Rossii].Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal prikladnyh i fundamental'nyh issledovanij, 2014, Iss.5-1, p.164. 6.Chumlyakov, C. S. Specificity of formation of transport complex structure at the regional level [Specifika formirovanija struktury transportnogo kompleksa na regional'nom urovne].Vestnik MADI, 2010, Iss.4, pp.46-51. 7.Chumlyakov, C. S. Geo-economic and geo-political factors and prerequisites of integration processes in the transport system of the region [Geoekonomicheskie i geopoliticheskie factory i predposylki integracionnyh processov v transportnoj sisteme regiona].VestnikINZhJeKONa. Serija Ekonomika, 2011, Iss.1, pp.90-95. 8.Chumlyakov, C. S. The strategic role of transport corridors in development of international transit transportation [Strategicheskaja rol' transportnyh koridorov v razvitii mezhdunarodnyh tranzitnyh perevozok].Rossijskij vneshneekonomicheskij vestnik, 2013, Iss.11, pp.62-67. 9.Chumlyakov, C. S. Transport infrastructure of Russia in the system of international economic relations [Transportnaja infrastruktura Rossii v sisteme mezhdunarodnyh hozjajstvennyh svjazej].IzvestijaVUZov. Sociologija. Ekonomika. Politika, 2013, Iss.4, pp.47-49. 10.Charter of the Commonwealth of Independent States // Executive Committee of the CIS, the official website.[Electronic source]: http://cis.minsk.by/reestr/ru/index.html#reestr/view/text?doc=187.Last accessed 06.12.2014. 11.Shafiev, R. M. Integration interaction of the CIS states in terms of accession to the WTO [Integracionnoe vzaimodejstvie gosudarstv SNG v uslovijah prisoedinenija k VTO].Rossijskij vneshneekonomicheskij vestnik, 2013, Iss.6, pp.3-14. 12.Lifan, Li.National energy security and Sino-Russian- Kazakh-Japan energy cooperation.Central Asia and the Caucasus, Iss.1 (43), 2007, pp.110-120. ; Текст аннотации на англ. языке и полный текст статьи на англ. языке находится в прилагаемом файле ПДФ (англ. версия следует после русской версии).Статья посвящена евразийским интеграционным процессам, развитию транспортных экспортно-импортных связей Российской Федерации, положению национальной транспортной системы в системе глобальных транспортных коммуникаций - и это все в контексте участия страны в международных экономических объединениях. Актуализирована необходимость поиска перспектив развития транспортной отрасли с учетом новых реалий после создания Таможенного союза и ЕАЭС. Предложена модель процесса усиления транспортно-транзитного потенциала за счет совершенствования таможенного и транспортно- логистического администрирования транспортной системы.