A True Measure of Success? The Discourse and Practice of Human Security in Haiti
In: The Whitehead journal of diplomacy and international relations, Band 7, Heft 1, S. 129-141
ISSN: 1538-6589
The human security agenda is described as the latest attempt to challenge state-centered conceptions of security. It has served to open debates on humanitarian intervention as well as the responsibility of sovereign states to protect their populations. Within the range of broad to narrow conceptions of human security, there is agreement that security from imminent threat of violence is a valid goal, but other goals of broader conceptions, especially at the declaratory level, create unease among states, including the US, that perceive human security as encroaching on their sovereignty & freedom of action. This article seeks to ascertain the extent to which human security has been integrated in institutional discourses & practices by examining the human security concerns reflected discursively by the UN mission in Haiti (UNMIH), 1993-1995, & the UN Stabilization Mission in Haiti (MINUSTAH), 2003-2005. They conclusions are mixed, but they are not meant to be an indictment of the human security framework. Rather, they are intended to introduce some caution in its implementation. The case of Haiti, where little long-term change has been effected by these missions, calls for a reevaluation of what can realistically be achieved in a given situation. Tables. J. Stanton