Suchergebnisse

[Russ.]. - [Kaiser Alexander I. Politik, Diplomatie] ; Volltext // Exemplar mit der Signatur: München, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek -- Russ. 225 n

.

оценка адаптированности курсанта к убытию в воинскую часть для выполнения задач по предназначению является важнейшим показателем эффективности работы всего личного состава учебных частей (учебных центров). Для более точного определения готовности к действиям по военно-учетной специальности необходимо определить критерии и показатели ; по которым осуществляется эта оценка. ; The assessment of the student's adaptation to departure to the military unit for the performance of tasks by designation is the most important indicator of the effectiveness of the work of all the personnel of the training units (training centers). For a more accurate determination of readiness for actions in the military specialty profession ; it is necessary to determine the criteria and indicators for which this assessment is carried out.

In Great Britain, on the first of March, the BBC broadcast an interview with Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn conducted by Michael Charlton of BBC. The impact of that interview upon the British public made news around the world. In late March the interview was shown in this country by the Public Broadcasting System on its program "Firing Line." We are pleased to publish, with permission, the full text of the BBC interview.—Eds.Aleksandr Isaech, when Mr. Brezhnev and the Politburo took the decision to exile you abroad rather than send you once more to a concentration camp, they must have believed that you would do less damage to the Communist state outside the Soviet Union than inside it. So I wonder if you believe time will prove that judgment to be correct?In the way you put that question there is a certain false assumption. If one puts the question in this way, we assume that the Politburo is all-powerful and independent in the decisions it makes, that it was free to decide one way or another.

This article compares two novels first submitted for Soviet publication in the mid-1960s, but only published during glasnost: Aleksandr Bek's New Appointment and Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn's Cancer Ward. The latter, though, well known, has not been analysed in terms of its illness imagery; it has also never been compared with Bek's less-studied but strikingly similar work, in terms of the illness imagery in the texts and in their reception by several generations of Soviet readers. The article uses medical humanities approaches to disease literature and conceptual metaphor theory to trace the complexity of both novels' treatment of mental and physical illness. It argues that they compel us to reconsider cancer as a political metaphor, and Soviet illness rhetoric, suggesting that both can be used for more polyvalent and moderate critique than is usually assumed.