Suchergebnisse

Cover -- Half Title -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Contents -- Introduction to the Transaction Edition -- Introduction -- [1] Rousseau and the Political Community -- [2] The Politics of Pluralism: Lamennais -- [3] Leadership and Social Crisis -- [4] Conservatism and Sociology -- [5] History and Sociology -- [6] The Decline and Fall of Social Class -- [7] Moral Values and Community -- [8] Sociology as an Art Form -- [9] Power and the Intellectual -- [10] The Impact of Technology on Ethical Decision-Making -- [11] Kinship and Political Power in First Century Rome -- [12] The Permanent Professors: A Modest Proposal -- [13] Project Camelot and the Science of Man -- [14] Conflicting Academic Loyalties

Cover Page -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Foreword -- The Importance of Bonald -- Translator's Note -- Introduction -- 1 Of the Proposed Civil Code, Presented by the Commission of the Council of State Named by the Government -- 2 Of Domestic Society -- 3 Of Public Society -- 4 Of Marriage -- 5 Of the Three States of Society: Imperfect -- Perfect or Natural -- Corrupted or against Nature -- 6 Of Society among the Jews -- 7 Of Society among the Orientals, Greeks, and Romans -- 8 Of Society among Christian Peoples -- 9 Revolution in Christian Society -- 10 Of the French Revolution -- 11 General Considerations on Divorce -- 12 Conclusion -- Appendix I -- Addendum -- Summation on the Divorce Question -- Index

Purpose
– Local policies often prohibit care staff from online contact with the people they support. The purpose of this paper is to review the reasons put forward for this ban and seek explanations.


Design/methodology/approach
– The paper examines relevant literature on the use of social networking by disabled and nondisabled people. This paper offers a critique of common policies and justifications and poses a challenge to those who impose such regulations.


Findings
– The paper finds no support for current policies.


Research limitations/implications
– The authors found only a limited amount of research in this area, and research findings were not commonly utilised by policy makers.


Practical implications
– Policy makers and regulators need to take a more rigorous and person-centred approach to rule making in respect of social media.


Social implications
– A widespread ban on the use of social media in communications between staff and the people they support is exposed as paternalistic and exacerbating infantilisation and exclusion rather than seeing disabled people as digital citizens. Regulators and those with responsibilities for safeguarding need to adopt a more empowering and person-centred approach.


Originality/value
– This paper will only make a difference if regulators and those with responsibilities for safeguarding adopt a more empowering and person-centred approach rather than the fear-based blanket prohibitions that have applied to date.