77 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of family history: studies in family, kinship and demography, Band 7, Heft 1, S. 52-75
ISSN: 1552-5473
In: Journal of Baltic studies: JBS, Band 12, Heft 2, S. 109-119
ISSN: 1751-7877
In: Nationalities papers: the journal of nationalism and ethnicity, Band 9, Heft 2, S. 263-264
ISSN: 1465-3923
In: Slavic review: interdisciplinary quarterly of Russian, Eurasian and East European studies, Band 40, Heft 4, S. 642-643
ISSN: 2325-7784
In: Slavic review: interdisciplinary quarterly of Russian, Eurasian and East European studies, Band 39, Heft 2, S. 356-357
ISSN: 2325-7784
In: Journal of family history: studies in family, kinship and demography, Band 2, Heft 1, S. 3-27
ISSN: 1552-5473
In: Comparative studies in society and history, Band 17, Heft 1, S. 2
ISSN: 1475-2999
In: Bulletin of Baltic studies: a publication of the Association for the Advancement of Baltic Studies, Band 2, Heft 2, S. 9-13
ISSN: 2379-6642
In: East and Central European History Writing in Exile 1939-1989, S. 68-92
In: Journal of Baltic studies: JBS, Band 21, Heft 2, S. 131-144
ISSN: 0162-9778
In: The history of the family: an international quarterly, Band 20, Heft 4, S. 530-545
ISSN: 1081-602X
In: The history of the family: an international quarterly, Band 9, Heft 1, S. 47-61
ISSN: 1081-602X
In: Continuity and change: a journal of social structure, law and demography in past societies, Band 18, Heft 1, S. 49-76
ISSN: 1469-218X
In Household and Family in Past Time (1972) Peter Laslett explicitly differentiated the study of kin relations within the domestic group from the study of those beyond it. Yet in subsequent decades the latter project – the conceptualization of the domestic group within the larger kin group – has not proceeded very far, even though it can easily be pictured as the 'next step' in micro-structural research. In part this is due to the inherent difficulties of recreating the larger kinship context precisely on the basis of available evidence. However, it is also because of changing conceptualizations of kinship and because demographic change demonstrably reduced the number of identifiable kin. If this project is to be pursued, its costs and benefits have to be weighed. On the one hand, the larger kin group may not have been important even if it can be identified as a group; also, migration might have dispersed kin groups so that only a few personal kin remained beyond the domestic group. On the other hand, the significance of kin groups is an empirical question which needs to be tested against historical evidence. Individuals also certainly had personal kin communities that were not corporate groups but still could have influenced the behaviors of persons within the domestic group. It is best to assume about the past that the domestic domain and the kinship domain interacted, creating the starting point for an interactive theory consisting of five propositions and their corollaries, outlined in the article.
In: The history of the family: an international quarterly, Band 5, Heft 2, S. 199-214
ISSN: 1081-602X
In: Continuity and change: a journal of social structure, law and demography in past societies, Band 14, Heft 1, S. 33-56
ISSN: 1469-218X