Suchergebnisse

ABSTRACTResearch participants should be drawn as fairly as possible from the potential volunteer population. Underlying personality traits are underexplored as factors influencing research decision‐making. Dispositional optimism, known to affect coping, physical health, and psychological well‐being, has been minimally studied with respect to research‐related attitudes. We conducted an exploratory, online survey with 151 individuals (with self‐reported mental illness [n = 50], physical illness [n = 51], or neither [n = 50]) recruited via MTurk. We evaluated associations between dispositional optimism (assessed with the Life Orientation Test—Revised) and general research attitudes, perceived protectiveness of five research safeguards, and willingness to participate in research using safeguards. Strongly optimistic respondents expressed more positive research attitudes and perceived four safeguards as more positively influencing willingness to participate. Optimism was positively associated with expressed willingness to participate in clinical research. Our findings add to a limited literature on the influence of individual traits on ethically salient research perspectives.

Objective To evaluate the potential for a smartphone application to improve trauma care through shared and timely access to patient and contextual information. Background Disruptions along the trauma pathway that arise from communication, coordination, and handoffs problems can delay progress through initial care, imaging diagnosis, and surgery to intensive care unit (ICU) disposition. Implementing carefully designed and evaluated information distribution and communication technologies may afford opportunities to improve clinical performance. Methods This was a pilot evaluation "in the wild" using a before/after design, 3 month, and pre- post-intervention data collection. Use statistics, usability assessment, and direct observation of trauma care were used to evaluate the app. Ease of use and utility were assessed using the technology acceptance model (TAM) and system usability scale (SUS). Direct observation deployed measures of flow disruptions (defined as "deviations from the natural progression of an procedure"), teamwork scores (T-NOTECHS), and treatment times (total time in emergency department [ED]). Results The app was used in 367 (87%) traumas during the trial period. Usability was generally acceptable, with higher scores found by operating room (OR), ICU, and neuro and orthopedic users. Despite positive trends, no significant effects on flow disruptions, teamwork scores, or treatment times were observed. Conclusions Pilot trials of a clinician-centered smartphone app to improve teamwork and communication demonstrate potential value for the safety and efficiency of trauma care delivery as well as benefits and challenges of "in-the-wild" evaluation.

This study evaluated stakeholders' perspectives regarding participation in two hypothetical neuromodulation trials focused on individuals with Alzheimer's disease and related disorders (ADRDs). Stakeholders (i.e., individuals at risk for ADRDs [ n = 56], individuals with experience as a caregiver for someone with a cognitive disorder [ n = 60], and comparison respondents [ n = 124]) were recruited via MTurk. Primary outcomes were willingness to enroll (or enroll one's loved one), feeling lucky to have the opportunity to enroll, and feeling obligated to enroll in two protocols (transcranial magnetic stimulation, TMS; deep brain stimulation, DBS). Relative to the Comparison group, the At Risk group endorsed higher levels of "feeling lucky" regarding both research protocols, and higher willingness to participate in the TMS protocol. These findings provide tentative reassurance regarding the nature of decision making regarding neurotechnology-based research on ADRDs. Further work is needed to evaluate the full range of potential influences on research participation.

Die gedruckte Ausg. ist im Rainer Hampp Verlag, München, Mering (www.Hampp-Verlag.de) erschienen.