Suchergebnisse

Die Verfasserin setzt sich mit den verschiedenen Facetten der Krimfrage auseinander, die ethnische Beziehungen, wirtschaftliche und soziale Faktoren, Probleme der politische Organisation sowie internationale und strategische Aspekte betreffen. Angesprochen werden mit diesem Problembündel die Situation der Krim-Tataren, die Abhängigkeit der Krim von ukrainischen Lieferungen und die Abhängigkeit der Ukraine von russischer Energie, die konstitutionelle Stellung der Krim in der Ukraine und die Kompetenzen des Parlaments und des Präsidenten der Krim sowie die Ansprüche russischer und ukrainischer Nationalisten in der Region. Die Krimfrage kann als typisch für postsowjetische Problemlagen angesehen werden, vor allem für das Verhältnis von zentrifugalen und zentripetalen Kräften, die Verbindung innen- und außenpolitischer Aspekte sowie das Verhältnis sozioökonomischer und politischer Entwicklungen. (BIOst-Wpt)

Examines national identity and political orientations of Crimean Tatars, who returned to their homeland after a forced exile under the communist regime; some focus on the National Movement of the Crimean Tatars and Organization of the Crimean Tatar National Movement.

The collapse of the Soviet empire in 1991 removed a decades-long system of successful control of potential ethnic and regional conflict . The result was the eruption of numerous conflicts over state-building, some of which degenerated into violence and some of which were resolved or prevented by strategies of accommodation. This volume explores the common trends and differences in the responses of the new post-Soviet states to the problems of state-building in ethnically and regionally divided societies, focusing on the impact of ethnic and regional conflicts on post-communist transition and i.

AbstractHow can and should we analyze mass mobilization and its outcomes in authoritarian (and potentially democratizing) states as social scientists? Are there any distinctive features to the study of mass mobilization and its outcomes in Eastern Europe? And how much should we focus on comparative analyses versus context and country specificities? The case of the 2020 mass mobilization in Belarus offers an opportunity to engage with and answer these questions in a reciprocal dialogue between scholars of protest and activism, politics of competitive authoritarian and democratizing contexts, and regional and country experts. This symposium brings together a diverse set of scholars and combines comparative and case-specific analyses and empirically driven and interpretive analyses that focus on different political, social, and cultural angles of this episode of mass mobilization and its aftermath.