Suchergebnisse

WHETHER CORPORATISM MATTERS OR NOT IS ONE OF THE MOST DIFFICULT AND INTRIGUING QUESTIONS CONFRONTING POLICY ANALYSTS. ONE APPROACH TO THE PROBLEM NOT PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED IS TO USE SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AS A MEANS OF TEASING OUT THE IMPLICATIONS OF GENERAL STRUCTURAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CORPORATIST AND PLURALIST POLITIES. BY USING A FRAMEWORK DERIVED FROM THE SYSTEMS ANALYSIS OF EASTON BUT INCORPORATING ELEMENTS OF POLITICAL COMPETITION AND ACCOUNTABILITY, IT IS SHOWN THAT CORPORATIST AND PLURALIST STATES DIFFER SIGNIFICANTLY IN THE WAYS IN WHICH THEY PROCESS INFORMATION AND GENERATE SUPPORT. THE COMBINATION OF CENTRALIZATION AND CONSENSUS PROVES TO BE THE KEY TO THE APPARENTLY GREATER LEARNING CAPACITY OF CORPORATIST SYSTEMS. THE ANALYSIS SUGGESTS THAT POLICYMAKING MAY ITSELF BE BETTER UNDERSTOOD AS A LEARNING MECHANISM RATHER THAN AS AN ALLOCATIVE PROCESS.

Argues that the settings in which the councillors have traditionally played their role in local government give inadequate support to many of their roles, and that, in particular, the dominance of the committee system and its mode of working inhibit the role of the councillor in the management of the authority. (JLN)

Looks at the development of public service management. (JLN)