Nudging Households to Take Up Health Insurance: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment in Burkina Faso
In: IZA Discussion Paper No. 10744
89 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: IZA Discussion Paper No. 10744
SSRN
Working paper
In: Scientific African, Band 10, S. e00631
ISSN: 2468-2276
In: Études africaines
Comment le suivi-évaluation participatif apporte une valeur ajoutée à l'effectivité des interventions du programme Paysages et Moyens d'Existence en Afrique Centrale et Occidentale? / par Dominique Endamana, Ricardo Furman, Jacques Somda -- Pour une meilleure implication des communautés dans le suivi et l'évaluation des actions de développement : l'expérience d'un projet pilote "Suivi-Evaluation Participatif" au Burkina Faso / par Jean-François Kobiané, Alexis Loye -- La participation des acteurs locaux à l'évaluation des projets de développement : cas des évaluations de la Banque mondiale au Burkina Faso / par Nouhoun Diallo -- Enjeux éthiques et défis méthodologiques de l'évaluation en santé en Afrique / par Seni Kouanda -- L'évaluation experte des projets de développement : entre instrumentalisation et production d'une analyse partagée / par Philippe Lavigne Delville -- L'évaluation en binôme / par Tinsakré Konkobo -- La problématique de l'expression des besoins en évaluation / par Issa Sombie, Abel Bicaba -- "Bonnes", "vraies" et "quelques meilleurs" pratiques d'évaluation de programme de développement en Afrique / par Valéry Ridde -- Pluralisme méthodologique et évaluation en santé publique en Afrique : une étude de cas au Burkina Faso / par Valéry Ridde -- Le recours aux approches qualitatives dans le cadre des évaluations de programme de santé en Afrique / par Honré Mimche -- L'utilité des données qualitatives dans les évaluations en santé publique / par Valéry Ridde -- Évaluation de la qualité des soins dans la perspective du consommateur : autopsie d'une pratique peu courante en Afrique / par Gervais Beninguisse -- Expériences et défis du suivi des interventions en santé maternelle et néonatale en Afrique / par S. Kouanda [and four others]
In: World development: the multi-disciplinary international journal devoted to the study and promotion of world development, Band 181, S. 106682
In recent years, there has been increasing interest in the impact of conflict on taxation, and a few articles have focused on aid effectiveness in conflict-affected countries. Both aid and conflict have been identified as major determinants of tax performance, however there is little agreement on the nature of their individual and joint effects on taxation. This study contributes to this debate by considering a sample of 123 developing countries over the period 1984 to 2014. Our findings show that aid granted during a period of conflict positively affects revenue collection, and this impact increases with technical assistance. A deeper analysis demonstrates a non-linear relationship between aid provided during conflict times and domestic revenue mobilization. The institutional environment appears to be a factor that may mitigate, and even reverse, the nature of the relationship between aid and revenue mobilization.
BASE
In recent years, there has been increasing interest in the impact of conflict on taxation, and a few articles have focused on aid effectiveness in conflict-affected countries. Both aid and conflict have been identified as major determinants of tax performance, however there is little agreement on the nature of their individual and joint effects on taxation. This study contributes to this debate by considering a sample of 123 developing countries over the period 1984 to 2014. Our findings show that aid granted during a period of conflict positively affects revenue collection, and this impact increases with technical assistance. A deeper analysis demonstrates a non-linear relationship between aid provided during conflict times and domestic revenue mobilization. The institutional environment appears to be a factor that may mitigate, and even reverse, the nature of the relationship between aid and revenue mobilization.
BASE
In: Environmental science & policy, Band 133, S. 87-97
ISSN: 1462-9011
International audience ; The main objective of this paper is to answer the following question: are the containment measures imposed by the majority of world governments effective and sufficient to stop the epidemic of COVID-19? Thanks to a mathematical model that we have developed, we have been able to show that containment measures appear to have slowed the growth of the outbreak. Nevertheless these measures remain only effective as long as a very large fraction of the population remains confined. This means that if no further action is taken, a new wave of contamination larger than the former is expected very shortly after the end of containment date. The combined measures of the large scale test of detection of infected individuals and the social distancing were shown to be effective to overcome the outbreak. While taking separately the both latter measures is not sufficient to prevent a second wave.
BASE
International audience ; The main objective of this paper is to answer the following question: are the containment measures imposed by the majority of world governments effective and sufficient to stop the epidemic of COVID-19? Thanks to a mathematical model that we have developed, we have been able to show that containment measures appear to have slowed the growth of the outbreak. Nevertheless these measures remain only effective as long as a very large fraction of the population remains confined. This means that if no further action is taken, a new wave of contamination larger than the former is expected very shortly after the end of containment date. The combined measures of the large scale test of detection of infected individuals and the social distancing were shown to be effective to overcome the outbreak. While taking separately the both latter measures is not sufficient to prevent a second wave.
BASE
International audience ; The main objective of this paper is to answer the following question: are the containment measures imposed by the majority of world governments effective and sufficient to stop the epidemic of COVID-19? Thanks to a mathematical model that we have developed, we have been able to show that containment measures appear to have slowed the growth of the outbreak. Nevertheless these measures remain only effective as long as a very large fraction of the population remains confined. This means that if no further action is taken, a new wave of contamination larger than the former is expected very shortly after the end of containment date. The combined measures of the large scale test of detection of infected individuals and the social distancing were shown to be effective to overcome the outbreak. While taking separately the both latter measures is not sufficient to prevent a second wave.
BASE
International audience ; The main objective of this paper is to answer the following question: are the containment measures imposed by the majority of world governments effective and sufficient to stop the epidemic of COVID-19? Thanks to a mathematical model that we have developed, we have been able to show that containment measures appear to have slowed the growth of the outbreak. Nevertheless these measures remain only effective as long as a very large fraction of the population remains confined. This means that if no further action is taken, a new wave of contamination larger than the former is expected very shortly after the end of containment date. The combined measures of the large scale test of detection of infected individuals and the social distancing were shown to be effective to overcome the outbreak. While taking separately the both latter measures is not sufficient to prevent a second wave.
BASE
International audience ; The main objective of this paper is to answer the following question: are the containment measures imposed by the majority of world governments effective and sufficient to stop the epidemic of COVID-19? Thanks to a mathematical model that we have developed, we have been able to show that containment measures appear to have slowed the growth of the outbreak. Nevertheless these measures remain only effective as long as a very large fraction of the population remains confined. This means that if no further action is taken, a new wave of contamination larger than the former is expected very shortly after the end of containment date. The combined measures of the large scale test of detection of infected individuals and the social distancing were shown to be effective to overcome the outbreak. While taking separately the both latter measures is not sufficient to prevent a second wave.
BASE
In: GEC-D-23-00525
SSRN
In: Etudes africaines
World Affairs Online
In: Economics Bulletin, Forthcoming
SSRN