Transnational Private Regulatory Governance: Ambiguities of Public Authority and Private Power
In: Osgoode CLPE Research Paper No. 45/2012
86 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Osgoode CLPE Research Paper No. 45/2012
SSRN
Working paper
In: Osgoode CLPE Research Paper No. 1/2012
SSRN
Working paper
In: This paper is a chapter in Jan Smits (ed.), Encyclopedia of Comparative Law (2nd ed., 2012, Edward Elgar), 899-925.
SSRN
In: Osgoode CLPE Research Paper No. 24/2011
SSRN
Working paper
In: THE OXFORD HANDBOOK OF GOVERNANCE, David Levi-Faur, ed., Oxford University Press, 2011
SSRN
Working paper
In: CLPE Research Paper No. 9/2009
SSRN
Working paper
In: Journal of institutional and theoretical economics: JITE, Band 165, Heft 1, S. 62
ISSN: 1614-0559
In: CLPE Research Paper No. 40/2008
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN
In: CLPE Research Paper No. 13/2008
SSRN
In: Osgoode Readers Ser.
This book assembles the works of scholars from around the world, forming a contextual demonstration of the increasing encounters and tensions among legal cultures. In offering different approaches to an understanding of transnational law, the chapters also bring out the important consequences of a more global outlook in legal scholarship, legal practice, and legal education
This book assembles the works of scholars from around the world, forming a contextual demonstration of the increasing encounters and tensions among legal cultures. In offering different approaches to an understanding of transnational law, the chapters also bring out the important consequences of a more global outlook in legal scholarship, legal practice, and legal education.
The globalization of capital markets since the 1980s has been accompanied by a vigorous debate over the convergence of corporate governance standards around the world towards the shareholder model. But even before the financial and economic crisis of 2008/2009, the dominance of the shareholder model was challenged with regard to persisting divergences and national differences in corporate law, labor law and industrial relations. This collection explores this debate at an important crossroads, echoing Karl Polanyi's famous observation in 1944 of the disembeddedness of the market from society. Drawing on pertinent insights from scholars, practitioners and regulators in corporate and labor law, securities regulation as well as economic sociology and management theory, the contributions shed important light on the empirical effects on the economy of the shift to shareholder primacy, in light of a comprehensive reconsideration of the global context, policy goals and regulatory forms which characterize market governance today.
In: Katelouzou , D & Zumbansen , P 2020 , ' The New Geographies of Corporate Governance ' , University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law , vol. 42 , no. 1 , pp. 51-153 .
This article starts from the understanding of corporate governance as a transnational regulatory field of law production, contestation and policy conflict. It advances three arguments, a historical one, a sociological one and a legal doctrinal/legal theoretical one. Historically, we argue that the evolution of corporate governance norms must be seen against the background of ongoing and continuing transformations in the relationships between states and markets in the provision of a growing range of formerly "public" services and functions. As the societal role of corporations expands beyond an essentially financial role, corporate governance norm production mirrors the diversification of regulatory concerns associated with the firm's place in society. From a sociological perspective, we argue that the transnationalization of present-day corporate governance regimes constitutes not so much a categorically different state of corporate law in an age of "globalization", but a continuation of the corporate law's inherent legal pluralism in terms of co-existing public and private, hard and soft, formal and informal norms. Finally, our legal doctrinal and legal theoretical argument posits that the emerging constellations of corporate governance are mirrored in changing understandings of rules applied to corporate responsibility, director liability or a company's reporting standards. In order to further explicate the particular dynamics that characterize the new geographies of corporate governance norms today, we take the evolving law of shareholder stewardship as a case-in-point. Our analysis intervenes at the intersection of what is, normatively, a political challenge to the corporate governance understanding of the past twenty years – the latter being confined to a triple fallacy of a vain competition between shareholder versus stakeholder oriented concepts of the firm, a polarization between monolithic national models of corporate governance, and a binary distinction between state-made/hard/binding law and non-state/soft/non-binding law – and, institutionally, the dramatic de-nationalization of market regulation through governmental fiat. We argue that this plurality of corporate governance political economies today can only be scrutinized through a more differentiated, analytical lens which focuses on the emerging actors, norms and processes that constitute the intersecting and overlapping transnational regimes of corporate governance today. Transnational corporate governance is thereby rendered as a methodological laboratory to inquire into emerging forms of authority and legitimacy, scrutinizing competing claims of effectiveness and testing the "real world" impact that emerging regulatory forms, such as stewardship codes, have on a wider set of stakeholders and "affected" populations. In that vein, a critical project of transnational corporate governance prompts a reconceptualization of the "transnationally embedded" corporation and its key actors as a counter model to today's financialized economic governance framework and has broader implications for corporate law production.
BASE