Dispute Settlement
In: WTO - Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, S. 798-815
47161 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: WTO - Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, S. 798-815
In: Return: Magazin für Transformation und Turnaround, Band 7, Heft 1, S. 32-32
ISSN: 2520-8187
In: Ossietzky: Zweiwochenschrift für Politik, Kultur, Wirtschaft, Band 17, Heft 4, S. 54-57
ISSN: 1434-7474
In: Family Law Newsletter, Boston Bar Association, Fall 2014
SSRN
In: Labour Disputes and their Resolution in China, S. 45-62
In: AQ: journal of contemporary analysis, Band 70, Heft 3, S. 39-43
ISSN: 0005-0091
In: Utopie kreativ: Diskussion sozialistischer Alternativen, Heft 4=78, S. 79-81
ISSN: 0863-4890
In: Middle East international: MEI, Band 483, S. 15
ISSN: 0047-7249
In: Jane's defence weekly: JDW, Band 13, Heft 23, S. 1156-1158
ISSN: 0265-3818
World Affairs Online
In: Marine policy, Band 5, Heft 3, S. 282-286
ISSN: 0308-597X
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 248, Heft 1, S. 37-43
ISSN: 1552-3349
The prevailing insolvency dispute resolution mechanism is adjudication, which has significant shortcomings: the irresolvable common pool problem, disruption of business, and high litigation costs. The question is therefore whether insolvency disputes can be settled without (some extent of) adjudication. Namely, through alternative dispute resolution (ADR), which has become a counterweight to adjudication in insolvency disputes. In contrast to adjudication, ADR makes it possible to avoid the intrinsic shortcomings of adjudication. Firstly, it aims to reach a peaceful settlement resulting in an agreement between the debtor and the creditors; secondly, it aims to reconcile the principle interests in insolvency cases (continuation of the debtor's business and satisfying the creditors' claims); and thirdly, the dispute is not resolved in public. The major pro-debtor countries (the United States of America, France) have introduced ADR mechanisms for insolvency disputes which will serve as the foundation for the development of ADR in insolvency disputes in other countries.
BASE
In: Studies in law, politics, and society, Band 12(Part A, S. 3-29
ISSN: 1059-4337
An analytic framework is developed for examining the processing of disputes in official bureaucracies. The model advances a social-constructionist concept of disputes & their processing that directs attention to how official intervention in activities actually creates disputes & gives them particular form. Primary focus is on official interventions that recognize & preserve a core element of conflict, & treat matters at issue as disputes. Following a critical review of the dispute transformation approach, the analysis shifts to consideration of the activities of public bureaucrats as outside parties intervening in, & disposing of, those disputes that come to their attention. It is suggested that the key to the process of intervention lies in when & how officials come to make inquiries about, understand, & ultimately align themselves in regard to dispute & the parties to it. 59 References. S. Millett