Casanova: enlightenment philosopher
In: Oxford University studies in the Enlightenment 2016,09
11417 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Oxford University studies in the Enlightenment 2016,09
In: German and European studies 24
"Over the course of the eighteenth century, European intellectuals shifted from admiring China as a utopian place of wonder to despising it as a backwards and despotic state. That transformation had little to do with changes in China itself, and everything to do with Enlightenment conceptions of political identity and Europe's own burgeoning global power. China in the German Enlightenment considers the place of German philosophy, particularly the work of Leibniz, Goethe, Herder, and Hegel, in this development. Beginning with the first English translation of Walter Demel's classic essay "How the Chinese Became Yellow," the collection's essays examine the connections between eighteenth-century philosophy, German Orientalism, and the origins of modern race theory."--
In: Modern intellectual history: MIH, Band 4, Heft 3, S. 601-616
ISSN: 1479-2451
Jonathan Israel, Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650–1750 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)Jonathan Israel, Enlightenment Contested: Philosophy, Modernity, and the Emancipation of Man 1670–1750 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006)"A public can only attain enlightenment slowly," Kant famously observed. His use of the term "public" (Publikum), of course, is notoriously slippery, and even now, after decades of academic discussion of Öffenlichkeit and l'opinion publique, it regularly trips up the unsuspecting undergraduate intent on answering Kant's central question: What is enlightenment? And yet it is clear that whatever else he meant, Kant envisioned a central role for the scholar (Gelehrter) in constituting the public, and furthering enlightenment. And so we might say, in a Kantian gloss, that scholars attain enlightenment, and knowledge of the Enlightenment, only slowly.
This synoptic survey examines critically the origins, development, decline, and historical significance of the European Enlightenment. The underlying theme of the inquiry is the real and possible relevance of the Enlightenment tradition to contemporary Western society.
In: Kant's Questions
"Have the courage to use your own understanding! - that is the motto of enlightenment." - Immanuel KantThe Enlightenment is one of the most important and contested periods in the history of philosophy. The problems it addressed, such as the proper extent of individual freedom and the challenging of tradition, resonate as much today as when they were first debated. Of all philosophers, it is arguably Kant who took such questions most seriously, addressing them above all in his celebrated short essay, An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment? In this engaging and lucid book, Samuel Fleis
Demonstrates the uniqueness of Hume as an Enlightenment thinker, illustrating how his 'spirit of scepticism' often leads him into seemingly paradoxical positions. This book will be of interest to Hume scholars, intellectual historians of 17th- to 19th-century Europe and those interested in the Enlightenment more widely.
In: Policy review: the journal of American citizenship, Heft 128, S. 89-96
ISSN: 0146-5945
Berkowitz reviews The Roads to Modernity: The British, French, and American Enlightenments by Gertrude Himmelfarb.
Initially proposed as a tool to unify different groups, electricity was used to silence and further marginalize the Hazara, a Shia minority in Afghanistan. This piece tracks and analyzes this ongoing problem, centering on the "Enlightenment Movement," Hazara protestation of the state in response to rerouting electricity. Discussing the governmental, ethnic, and geographic features at play in the issue of electricity, this paper argues that the Enlightenment Movement is not just fueled by a desire for electricity, but a demand for a wider discussion of Hazara civil rights.
BASE
In: Social justice: a journal of crime, conflict and world order, Band 27, S. 237-251
ISSN: 1043-1578, 0094-7571
Enlightenment can be considered a form of punishment. In particular, the form of enlightenment that facilitates freedom & that is based on common ethical considerations, though not incompatible with Kant, is outside the boundaries of Kant's common sense. In describing the process by which individuals rectify & censure the actions of others & themselves, enlightenment as a form of punishment becomes evident. This line of thinking, when properly explored, could lead to new thoughts regarding the politics of punishment. When the deplorable condition of not only our prison system, but also our public morality is examined, it becomes obvious that drastic measures, & extreme rethinking, are desperately needed. Unless radical steps are taken to reform the prison system, society as it currently is defined is in danger. 25 References. K. A. Larsen
In: Social research: an international quarterly, Band 66, Heft 4, S. 959, 1009,
ISSN: 0037-783X