The Strasbourg Court and Domestic Judicial Politics
In: In International Courts and Domestic Politics, edited by Marlene Wind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 71–92, 2018
6243 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: In International Courts and Domestic Politics, edited by Marlene Wind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 71–92, 2018
SSRN
In: Michigan Bar Journal, Band 85, Heft 1, S. 38
SSRN
In: Hastings Law Journal, Band 50, S. 1199
SSRN
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 63, Heft 1, S. 302
ISSN: 0022-3816
In: European administrative governance
In: Annual review of political science, Band 14, S. 131-158
ISSN: 1094-2939
In: Annual Review of Political Science, Band 14, S. 131-157
SSRN
In: The European Court and Civil Society, S. 119-168
In: Journal of European public policy, Band 19, Heft 1, S. 25-42
ISSN: 1350-1763
World Affairs Online
In: Cornell Law Review, Band 97
SSRN
In: Perspectives on politics, Band 6, Heft 4, S. 741-767
ISSN: 1541-0986
The past decade has brought an unprecedented boom in the study of courts as political actors in Latin America. We examine the extraordinary diversity of academic research on judicial politics in the region, identifying the key questions, findings, and theoretical debates in the literature, highlighting important conceptual disjunctions, and critiquing the research methods scholars of judicial politics in Latin America have employed in their work. We close by suggesting new avenues of inquiry to help advance the collective effort to understand the roles courts play in Latin American politics.
In: Dyevre, Arthur. "The German federal constitutional court and European judicial politics." West European Politics 34.2 (2011): 346-361.
SSRN
In: Teaching texts in law and politics 36
In: Challenge and change in African politics
"That judicial institutions are important for emerging democracies leaves little (if any) room for debate. But to what extent do judiciaries in these new democracies maintain their autonomy? And what accounts for varying levels of autonomy across states? Drawing on the cases of Malawi, Zambia, and Namibia - and offering a novel analytical framework - Peter VonDoepp illuminates why power holders behave as they do toward the courts." "VonDoepp considers whether and why political leaders have respected or undermined judicial autonomy in each of the three cases. He also addresses how the courts themselves have shaped executive-judicial relations. His findings present unexpected challenges for existing frameworks, as well as important lessons about the factors and conditions affecting judicial development in transitional states."--BOOK JACKET
World Affairs Online
In: Albany Law Review, Band 68, S. 713
SSRN