Liberalism
In: Understanding Democratic Politics: An Introduction, S. 231-241
27635 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Understanding Democratic Politics: An Introduction, S. 231-241
In: https://doi.org/10.7916/D8QZ2BFX
Advocates of political liberalism hold it as a superior alternative to perfectionism on the grounds that it avoids superfluous and/or controversial claims in favor of a maximally-inclusive approach undergirded by a "free-standing" justification for the ideology. These assertions prove difficult to defend: political interpretations of liberalism tend to be implicitly ethnocentric; they often rely upon a number of controversial, and even empirically falsified, assumptions about rationality and can much more effectively accommodate the illiberal challenge.
BASE
In: Political theory: an international journal of political philosophy, Band 32, Heft 3, S. 396-408
ISSN: 0090-5917
In: Social science quarterly, Band 68, Heft 3, S. 648-650
ISSN: 0038-4941
In: The Western political quarterly, Band 1, Heft 3, S. 295-297
ISSN: 1938-274X
The four essays in this collection address the history of liberalism outside Europe, at the same time as they reinscribe European liberalism in global contexts. They ask where, beyond Europe and the North Atlantic, has liberal thought flourished as a way to think about problems of state formation, political economy and social order? They take historical scholarship beyond territories that were formally "colonies" of Europe (or of Europeans) to centres of intellectual activity stimulated and challenged by the global circulation of Western liberalism: the Ottoman Empire, the kingdoms of East Asia, the colonial world, the revolutionary world. Their "global" character is less evident in their individual geographical reach, and more apparent in their individual contributions to the sum of what we know about the appearance of liberal ideas beyond their transatlantic intellectual streams. We have brought them together here in order to raise questions about both the limits of liberalism as a concept, and the conceptual frontiers of intellectual history.
BASE
In: The economic history review, Band 4, Heft 3, S. 400-402
ISSN: 1468-0289
Why is liberalism so often dismissed by thinkers from both the left and the right? To those calling for wholesale transformation or claiming a monopoly on "realistic" conceptions of humanity, liberalism's assured progressivism can seem hard to swallow. Bleak Liberalism makes the case for a renewed understanding of the liberal tradition, showing that it is much more attuned to the complexity of political life than conventional accounts have acknowledged. Amanda Anderson examines canonical works of high realism, political novels from England and the United States, and modernist works to argue that liberalism has engaged sober and even stark views of historical development, political dynamics, and human and social psychology. From Charles Dickens's Bleak House and Hard Times to E. M. Forster's Howards End to Doris Lessing's The Golden Notebook, this literature demonstrates that liberalism has inventive ways of balancing sociological critique and moral aspiration. A deft blend of intellectual history and literary analysis, Bleak Liberalism reveals a richer understanding of one of the most important political ideologies of the modern era.
In: NIU series in Slavic, East European, and Eurasian studies
Russian Liberalism charts the development of liberal ideas and political organizations in Russia as well as the implementation of liberal reforms by the Russian and Soviet governments at various points in time. Paul Robinson's comprehensive survey covers the entire period from the late eighteenth century to the present day. Robinson demonstrates that liberalism has always lacked strong roots in the Russian population, being largely espoused by a narrow group of intellectuals whose culture it has reflected, and has tended toward a form of historical determinism that sees Russia as destined to become like the West. Many see the current political struggle between Russia and the West as being in part a conflict between the liberal West and an illiberal Russia. By explaining the historical causes of liberalism's failure in that country, Russian Liberalism offers an understanding of a significant aspect of contemporary international affairs. After Putin's February 2022 invasion of Ukraine, understanding Russian political thought is a matter of considerable importance.
World Affairs Online
In: Telos, Heft 101, S. 169-172
ISSN: 0040-2842, 0090-6514
Part of a special section, "Is There a 'Telos' left in Telos? Reflections after 100 Issues," discussing the progressive developments of historical ideologies & the true nature of modern liberalism, as distinct from nineteenth-century Western liberalism. New liberalism is described as oppressive, & the claims of some critics that this liberalism will be defeated through populist federalism are unsubstantiated. This form of liberalism is a bureaucratic democracy that enforces equality & secularization; it arose from industrialization, urbanization, & capitalism. The ruling class creates conformity by maintaining peace & sharing profits; even multiculturalism is a tool for controlling minorities. For any form of populist challenge to succeed in the US, it must replace the Republican Party, which seeks to maintain the status quo. M. Piciocchi