Suchergebnisse

What is justice?- The ultimate basis of social conflict.- The principle of self-centered appreciation commonly called self-interest.- The forms of human conflict.- Economic competition.- How ought wealth to be distributed?- How much is a man worth?- Interest.- Socialism and the present unrest.- Constructive democracy.- The single tax.- The question of inheritance.- The question of monopoly.- The cure for poverty.- The responsibility of the rich for the condition of the poor.- Social service.- How ought the burdens of taxation to be distributed? ; Mode of access: Internet.

What is justice?--The ultimate basis of social conflict.--The principle of self-centered appreciation commonly called self-interest.--The forms of human conflict.--Economic competition.--How ought wealth to be distributed?--How much is a man worth?--Interest.--Socialism and the present unrest.--Constructive democracy.--The single tax.--The question of inheritance.--The question of monopoly.--The cure for poverty.--The responsibility of the rich for the condition of the poor.--Social service.--How ought the burdens of taxation to be distributed? ; Mode of access: Internet.

What is justice?--The ultimate basis of social conflict.--The principle of self-centered appreciation commonly called self-interest.--The forms of human conflict.--Economic competition.--How ought wealth to be distributed?--How much is a man worth?--Interest.--Socialism and the present unrest.--Constructive democracy.--The single tax.--The question of inheritance.--The question of monopoly.--The cure for poverty.--The responsibility of the rich for the condition of the poor.--Social service.--How ought the burdens of taxation to be distributed? ; Mode of access: Internet.

Explores why articulating social justice in both development discourse and practice provides the potential for a fresh understanding of global poverty, and one that rises above the current 'impasse'. Suggests how principles of global social justice could be used to shift the development paradigm away from a consensus that hinges on Washington

Die hier vorgetragenen sozialphilosophischen Überlegungen zur sozialen Gerechtigkeit in einer Marktwirtschaft zeigen, daß die Verwirklichung dieser Gerechtigkeit, so wie sie gewöhnlich verstanden wird, zu lasten der Individuen gehen würde. Gerechtigkeit für die Individuen bedeutet Übereinstimmung mit internalisierten Regeln und Standards - im Endeffekt ist also das Individuum der Referenzpunkt. Eine Abkehr hiervon, theoretisch hier dargestellt am Modell einer "wirklich" gerechten Einkommensverteilung, ist denkbar, würde aber letztens von "sozialer Gerechtigkeit" zu einer "Verteilungsgerechtigkeit" führen. Für die freie Marktwirtschaft, insbesondere deren Produktivität, wäre dieses, ähnlich wie es auch Hayek sieht, tötlich. (NG)