Suchergebnisse

1. Introduction -- 2. Objective nature -- 3. We are all one life -- 4. The exploitation of nature and women -- 5. Phenomenology and the environment -- 6. Coping with individualism -- 7. Lines into the future -- 8. Ecology and communities -- 9. The importance of being an individual -- 10. The aesthetics of the natural environment.

Intro -- Heidegger and Practical Philosophy -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Abbreviations -- Introduction -- 1. Free Thinking -- 2. The Interpretation of Aristotle's Notionof Aretê in Heidegger's First Courses -- 3. Freedom, Finitude, and the Practical Self: The Other Side of Heidegger's Appropriation of Kant -- 4. Hier ist kein warum Heidegger and Kant's Practical Philosophy -- 5. Heidegger's "Originary Ethics" -- 6. The Call of Conscience: The Most Intimate Alterity -- 7. The "Play of Transcendence" and the Question of Ethics -- 8. "Homo Prudens" -- 9. In the Middle of Heidegger's Three Concepts of the Political -- 10. The Baby and the Bath Water: On Heidegger and Political Life -- 11. Heidegger's Practical Politics: Of Time and the River -- 12. Heidegger and Arendt: The Birth of Political Action and Speech -- 13. Heidegger and the Origins of Responsibility -- 14. Reading Heidegger Responsibly: Glimpses of Being in Dasein's Development -- 15. The Community of Those Who Are Going to Die -- 16. Heidegger and the Question of Empathy -- 17. Nihilism and Its Discontents -- 18. Is There an Ethics for the "Atomic Age"? -- 19. Praxis and Gelassenheit: The "Practice" of the Limit -- 20. Psychoanalytic Praxis and the Truth of Pain -- Contributors -- Index -- A -- B -- C -- D -- E -- F -- G -- H -- I -- J -- K -- L -- M -- N -- O -- P -- R -- S -- T -- U -- V -- W.

Cover -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Table of Contents -- The Macat Library -- Critical Thinking and "Modern Moral Philosophy" -- About the Author of the Original Work -- About the Authors of the Analysis -- About Macat -- Ways in to the Text -- Who Was G. E. M. Anscombe? -- What does "Modern Moral Philosophy" Say? -- Why does "Modern Moral Philosophy" Matter? -- Section 1: Influences -- Module 1: The Author and the Historical Context -- Module 2: Academic Context -- Module 3: The Problem -- Module 4: The Author's Contribution -- Section 2: Ideas -- Module 5: Main Ideas -- Module 6: Secondary Ideas -- Module 7: Achievement -- Module 8: Place in the Author's Work -- Section 3: Impact -- Module 9: The First Responses -- Module 10: The Evolving Debate -- Module 11: Impact and Influence Today -- Module 12: Where Next? -- Glossary of Terms -- People Mentioned in the Text -- Works Cited -- The Macat Library by Discipline.

Interpretations of Kant usually focus on his legal or political cosmopolitanism, a cluster of ideas revolving around perpetual peace, an international organisation, the reform of international law, and what Kant has termed cosmopolitan law or the law of world citizens (Weltburgerrecht). In this essay, I argue that there are different cosmopolitanisms in Kant, and focus on the relationship among political, legal or juridical, moral and ethico-theological cosmopolitanisms. I claim that these form part of a comprehensive system and are fully compatible with each other, given Kant's framework. I conclude that it is not self-evident that one can pick out some elements of this greater system as if they were independent of it. Adapted from the source document.

The ancient Greek medicine was based on the principle that philosophy influences all natural sciences as a whole. The doctor had, first of all, a humanistic formation followed by study of applied sciences specific to medicine. If humanism is purely theoretical, medicine is an applied science and the two-philosophy and medical knowledge, despite the apparent antinomy are able to create a union to the benefit of humanity. Medicine is the art of treating patients, identifying diseases and malady prevention. In its endeavor, medicine is based on the findings of numerous other fields such as physics, chemistry, anatomy, physiology, etc. Philosophy, on the other hand, can be defined as an attempt to understand human life as a whole. It is inevitable that the two ways of dealing with human beings to have influenced each other and the history of mankind. Both forms of knowledge have a major impact and influence on the world. Philosophy, understood in its older meaning, urged towards the prophylaxis and treatment of diseases of the soul whereas medicine, relying on philosophical teachings is aimed at healing the body and study its psychosomatic features.