Suchergebnisse

Tribal government -- Tribal justice systems -- Tribal constitutions -- Tribal membership -- Tribal elections -- Civil rights -- Criminal law and procedure -- Domestic relations -- Property -- Contracts -- Torts -- Procedure and jurisdiction -- Tribal regulatory and administrative law -- Professional responsibility and regulation of lawyers.

Only paperback edition of great legal classic by noted Supreme Court Justice. Lucid, accessible coverage, from a historical perspective, of liability, criminal law, torts, bail, possession and ownership, contracts, successions, many other aspects of civil and criminal law. Indispensable reading for lawyers, political scientists, interested general readers.

The authors defined conceptual provisions of the modern classification and specification of legal technologies. The legal tools of law enforcement technology are investigated, its concept and structure are revealed, typologies of law enforcement and law enforcement technology are defined; the forms of expression of law enforcement technology are investigated; the features of the use of law enforcement technology in various types of legal activity are revealed; the author's model of law enforcement technology of arbitration proceedings is developed; the problems of law enforcement monitoring are analyzed. The authors have proposed the ways of using judicial practice in law enforcement monitoring.

The authors defined conceptual provisions of the modern classification and specification of legal technologies. The legal tools of law enforcement technology are investigated, its concept and structure are revealed, typologies of law enforcement and law enforcement technology are defined; the forms of expression of law enforcement technology are investigated; the features of the use of law enforcement technology in various types of legal activity are revealed; the author's model of law enforcement technology of arbitration proceedings is developed; the problems of law enforcement monitoring are analyzed. The authors have proposed the ways of using judicial practice in law enforcement monitoring.

PRINCIPLE OF THE USE OF ONE'S NATIONAL LANGUAGE IN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS IS FIXED CLEARLY AND CONSISTENTLY IN THE USSR CONSTITUTION AND IN THE CONSTITUTIONS OF THE UNION REPUBLICS, AND WAS RESTATED IN THE PRINCIPLES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND IN THE CODES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE OF ALL THE UNION REPUBLICS. THUS IT ACQUIRED THE STANDING OF A CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE.

In Russia, like elsewhere in the world, artificial intelligence, robots and robotic technologies have been introduced into various fields of economy, and state and public life. The variety of spheres of application in which artificial intelligence in different forms is currently used and will be used in future, have implications for the legal system and require adequate legal developments that would take into account the features of these fundamentally novel and previously unknown technologies. The solution of this complex task, in its turn, involves theoretical understanding of multiple conceptual issues that can affect the success or failures of legal regulations in the area of public relations under consideration. The article considers Asimov's laws of robotics and ethical norms that have been proposed for artificial intelligence in the Concept of development of regulation of relations in the sphere of artificial intelligence and robotics technologies for the period till 2024. The authors discuss the subject of criminal law assessment of robots' behavior, and propose the understanding and definitions of notions like "ethics" and "lawfulness" of robots' behavior, "ethical violations", "offences", "guilt" and "responsibility" of robots. The authors also analyze anthropomorphism as one of the strategies of social robotics, its pros and cons. The authors conclude that legislation should use as a starting point the functions of artificial intelligence and it should be uniform towards all emerging forms. At present stage of development, it is necessary to have a legal regime established for robots (artificial intelligence), while the legal status for them is the matter of future, when they will acquire real autonomy and will be able to carry out their own free choice of behavior.

This Article addresses the protection of the natural environment in a non-international armed conflict (NIAC) by applying international humanitarian law (IHL) and international criminal law (ICL) in a transitional justice tribunal. In December 2016, the Colombian government and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia–People's Army (FARC-EP) guerrilla group signed an agreement which established the Special Jurisdiction for Peace (JEP), a tribunal designed to investigate, prosecute, and punish those responsible for the most serious crimes committed during the Colombian Armed Conflict. The agreement and the regulations of the JEP establish that this tribunal could directly apply IHL and ICL when examining crimes under investigation. However, case law related to this subject matter is almost nonexistent. Therefore, the JEP should create case law that can be studied and followed by other international and domestic criminal tribunals, while shedding light on the international standard on environmental protection emanating from IHL and ICL.In this Article, we demonstrate how the JEP can effectively use IHL and ICL when prosecuting war crimes which have harmful effects on the environment. For this purpose, Part I presents background on the Colombian Armed Conflict. Part II describes the JEP, the generalities of its legal framework and the specifics of the use of international law by this tribunal. Part III examines relevant domestic and international sources to explain the insufficiency of domestic law and the ability of international law to surpass those limitations. Part IV recalls the sources of ICL and IHL related to the protection of the natural environment in NIACs. Finally, Part V discusses recent JEP decisions related to the protection of the natural environment and some possible conduct to be investigated in the future. We conclude by describing the benefits of the JEP's use of international law.

In this study the author presented the analysis of international legal norms in the field of humanization of criminal proceedings. He gave a special focus on the significance and improvement of the mechanism of observing the international legal norms in the field of humanization of criminal proceedings and their reflection in national legislation. Besides that, the author delivered grounded explanation for the improvement of national legislation in relation to the international legal norms.

This article addresses the constitutional foundations of Criminal-Law policy. The constitutional foundations are the basic principles, values, and guarantees provided by the Constitution.The observance of constitutional principles and human rights plays an important role in the adoption, amendment, or termination of legislation. It has been found out that it is important to keep the security of society and individuals at the heart of the "protection" of state security, to be guided by the system of constitutional foundations (legality, humanism, justice, equality). This should also be taken into account in developing Criminal Law policy.In particular, the Constitution of Ukraine provides the following general law principles, which are also the principles of penal policy: rule of law, equality, the presumption of innocence, etc. The principles are reflected in the criminal legislation of Ukraine.It has been established that the constitutional principles are aimed at ensuring the human safety and freedom, as well as the tasks of the Criminal Code (Article 1 of the Criminal Code).The author proved that the Constitutional fundamentals influencing penal policy, including the criminalization and decriminalization, penalization and depenalization, etc. Violation of constitutional order and government, guaranteed rights and freedoms, and not performing the duties could threaten constitutional basis. In cases provided by the Criminal Code of Ukraine, for the violation of the human rights and freedoms, criminal liability is established.The author established that to minimize inconsistencies Criminal Law and the Constitution of Ukraine it seems appropriate to consolidate humanistic constitutional foundations of the Preamble of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, as it defines the content of the norms of the Criminal Code of Ukraine as a whole and further reformation of its text based on the concept laid down in the Preamble. This means that, in the event of adoption of or amendment to the Criminal Law, it is necessary to formulate these changes in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution of Ukraine.Article received 28.02.2019 ; У статті досліджено питання конституційних основ кримінально-правової політики. Консти-туційні основи – це основні принципи, цінності, гарантії, права та свободи людини, передбачені Конституцією. Обґрунтовано, що конституційні основи впливають на кримінально-правову політику. Порушення встановленого Конституцією конституційного ладу та устрою, гарантованих прав та свобод громадян, а також невиконання обов'язків може створювати загрозу конституційним основам. У випадках, передбачених КК України, за порушення прав та свобод громадян встановлюється кримінальна відповідальність. Зроблено висновок, що для мінімізації невідповідностей кримінального законодавства та Конституції України видається доцільним закріплення гуманістичних конституційних основ у Преамбулі КК України, оскільки вона визначає зміст норм КК України загалом та подальше реформування його тексту, що спирається на закладений у Преамбулі концепт. Це означає, що в разі прийняття або ж внесення змін до кримінального законодавства необхідним є формування цих змін відповідно до положень Конституції України. Запропоновано авторську редакцію Преамбули, а також зміни до КК України в частині встановлення кримінальної відповідальності за умисне внесення змін до КК України, які не відповідають основним положенням Конституції.Матеріал надійшов 28.02.2019